[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3902c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.07 4 1izlM CLA Rep, Mult 79,82
20.06 3 3jcuD CLA Rep, Mult 73,76,80
30.04 2 4bs1A ADP Rep, Mult 81,152,153,156
40.04 2 2gyiB MG Rep, Mult 143,146
50.04 2 2buqA CAQ Rep, Mult 108,110
60.04 2 3jcuL CLA Rep, Mult 80,84
70.02 1 1tyeA UUU Rep, Mult 112,133,141
80.02 1 3bpxA SAL Rep, Mult 74,78
90.02 1 3da3A MG Rep, Mult 151,153
100.02 1 2vdnA III Rep, Mult 74,80,144,145
110.02 1 3wctD OXY Rep, Mult 44,68,79,83
120.02 1 1gzmB C8E Rep, Mult 79,125
130.02 1 2vc2A 180 Rep, Mult 45,54,71,77
140.02 1 5tglA HEE Rep, Mult 62,128
150.02 1 2iubD MG Rep, Mult 94,95,100,156
160.02 1 3ao1B BZX Rep, Mult 85,89,95
170.02 1 4flfA XXH Rep, Mult 8,10
180.02 1 1tyeC CA Rep, Mult 47,49,53,55

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601ethA0.4334.970.0380.7273.1.1.3NA
20.0601hplA0.4175.050.0320.6933.1.1.382,144
30.0601utwF0.4455.330.0490.7733.2.1.26NA
40.0601eutA0.4325.440.0500.7503.2.1.18NA
50.0602bfgA0.4224.910.0850.6823.2.1.37NA
60.0602zofA0.4335.260.0680.7393.4.13.18NA
70.0602icyB0.4255.620.0690.7732.7.7.99
80.0602e1pA0.4394.750.0380.7103.4.21.6213
90.0601euuA0.4275.320.0650.7393.2.1.1833
100.0601ygaA0.4265.090.0600.6995.1.3.3NA
110.0602g8sA0.4295.150.0670.7221.1.5.-NA
120.0601pn0C0.4435.420.0650.7901.14.13.7NA
130.0601wqlA0.4435.320.0520.8121.14.12.-NA
140.0601w27A0.4295.200.0430.7224.3.1.24NA
150.0601g72A0.4275.360.0570.7561.1.99.8NA
160.0601uliC0.4325.420.0520.8011.14.12.18NA
170.0601z01A0.4265.440.0600.7441.14.13.61NA
180.0602dkiA0.4225.740.0660.7781.14.13.23NA
190.0601zxvA0.4284.570.0800.6823.4.24.83NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.4695.140.050.783pigB GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
10.070.4764.830.070.764q1vA GO:0006508 GO:0008236 GO:0016787 GO:0046872
20.060.4104.930.050.653ugfB GO:0004553 GO:0004564 GO:0004575 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
30.060.4095.250.040.702ac1A GO:0004553 GO:0004564 GO:0004575 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005886 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0009611 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0048046 GO:0080167
40.060.3964.850.030.653kf5A GO:0004553 GO:0004564 GO:0004575 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
50.060.4804.850.090.785annA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
60.060.4005.340.050.694eqvA GO:0004553 GO:0004564 GO:0004575 GO:0005576 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0005987 GO:0008152 GO:0010147 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0034484 GO:0051670 GO:1902927
70.060.3955.440.070.722bklB GO:0004252 GO:0006508 GO:0008236 GO:0070008
80.060.4235.070.070.702gbcA GO:0002020 GO:0002709 GO:0004177 GO:0004252 GO:0005102 GO:0005518 GO:0005576 GO:0005783 GO:0005794 GO:0005886 GO:0006508 GO:0007155 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0008239 GO:0008284 GO:0009986 GO:0010716 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016324 GO:0016787 GO:0030027 GO:0030054 GO:0030139 GO:0031258 GO:0031295 GO:0042277 GO:0042803 GO:0042995 GO:0043542 GO:0045121 GO:0051234 GO:0071438
90.060.4125.170.030.703ldkA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
100.060.4105.520.040.704wjlB GO:0005886 GO:0006508 GO:0008236 GO:0008239 GO:0015459 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0072659 GO:0090004 GO:1901379
110.060.4045.150.060.674bp8A GO:0004252 GO:0006508 GO:0008236 GO:0070008
120.060.3855.000.080.613munA GO:0004252 GO:0006508 GO:0008236 GO:0070008
130.060.3685.670.020.672aj8A GO:0001618 GO:0001662 GO:0001666 GO:0002020 GO:0004177 GO:0004252 GO:0005102 GO:0005576 GO:0005765 GO:0005886 GO:0005925 GO:0006508 GO:0007155 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0008239 GO:0008284 GO:0009986 GO:0010716 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016324 GO:0016787 GO:0030027 GO:0030054 GO:0030139 GO:0031258 GO:0031295 GO:0033632 GO:0035641 GO:0036343 GO:0042110 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0042995 GO:0043542 GO:0045121 GO:0046581 GO:0046718 GO:0070062 GO:0071438
140.060.4185.190.070.721xfdA GO:0005886 GO:0006508 GO:0008076 GO:0008236 GO:0008239 GO:0009986 GO:0015459 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0043025 GO:0043268 GO:0070062 GO:0072659 GO:1901379
150.060.3865.290.040.671y4wA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0051669
160.060.4224.960.050.702addA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0051669
170.060.3724.880.060.592d5lA GO:0004177 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0016787
180.060.3915.120.050.653o4jC GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008236 GO:0016787


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0090599
GO-Score 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0044238 GO:0071704
GO-Score 0.41 0.38
Cellular Component GO:0005618 GO:0048046 GO:0005886 GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.