[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3897c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.13 6 2ovrB III Rep, Mult 24,41,62,78,109,145,204
20.07 3 1e1aA CA Rep, Mult 24,109,146,204
30.02 1 1qniA CUA Rep, Mult 39,41,63
40.02 1 1cq1B CA Rep, Mult 87,88
50.02 1 3fbyC CA Rep, Mult 146,148,150,152,153,155
60.02 1 1yklA DHB Rep, Mult 98,99,190
70.02 1 3lw5H CLA Rep, Mult 28,30
80.02 1 3sbrF IMD Rep, Mult 119,174,182
90.02 1 4v0nF HG Rep, Mult 61,62,107
100.02 1 1flgA CA Rep, Mult 56,59,81
110.02 1 3t6xB CBS Rep, Mult 92,178,180
120.02 1 2rhpA CA Rep, Mult 70,72,74,76
130.02 1 1yo8A CA Rep, Mult 169,171,173,175,178
140.02 1 1yo8A CA Rep, Mult 150,152,155,157,160,161,162
150.02 1 1yklG DHB Rep, Mult 98,99
160.02 1 3fbyC CA Rep, Mult 52,53,54,56,58,60,64,67

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602f10A0.5654.790.0350.8713.2.1.18NA
20.0602gc7A0.5554.980.0570.8761.4.99.369
30.0601nn2A0.5504.500.0540.8293.2.1.18NA
40.0601gjqA0.5894.910.0710.9331.7.99.1,1.7.2.1NA
50.0602aepA0.5494.410.0590.8243.2.1.18NA
60.0601madH0.5544.980.0790.8761.4.99.369,114
70.0602g8sA0.5574.570.0470.8431.1.5.-NA
80.0601aomB0.5964.910.0500.9481.7.99.1,1.7.2.1NA
90.0601qksB0.5984.890.0550.9481.7.2.179
100.0601cvmA0.5584.950.0510.8763.1.3.838,208
110.0601vcuB0.5664.960.0410.8953.2.1.18NA
120.0601kv9A0.6084.820.0630.9331.1.99.-NA
130.0601s0kA0.5524.900.0410.8813.2.1.18NA
140.0601fwxA0.5704.870.0680.8811.7.99.681
150.0601kb0A0.6054.870.0630.9331.1.99.-NA
160.0601jofA0.5744.960.0760.8905.5.1.5NA
170.0602h47H0.5605.070.0360.9001.4.99.4111,115
180.0602bixA0.5565.260.0360.9091.14.99.-144
190.0601ri6A0.5734.770.0480.8713.1.1.3162

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.6054.860.060.931kb0A GO:0005509 GO:0009055 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0020037 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
10.070.6084.820.060.931kv9A GO:0005509 GO:0009055 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0020037 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070968
20.070.6104.770.060.944maeA GO:0005509 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0052930 GO:0052931 GO:0052932 GO:0052933 GO:0052934 GO:0052935 GO:0052936 GO:0055114
30.070.5405.170.060.884hdjA GO:0009279 GO:0016020 GO:0043165 GO:0051205
40.070.5604.490.050.834immA GO:0009279 GO:0016020 GO:0043165 GO:0046872 GO:0051205
50.070.5144.940.050.811lrwA GO:0005509 GO:0015945 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0052930 GO:0052931 GO:0052932 GO:0052933 GO:0055114
60.070.6184.670.060.934aahA GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0015945 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0030288 GO:0046872 GO:0052930 GO:0052931 GO:0052932 GO:0052933 GO:0055114
70.070.5984.760.040.924pk1A GO:0007155 GO:0009279 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019867 GO:0042802 GO:0043165 GO:0051205 GO:0071709 GO:1990063
80.070.5184.870.030.802d0vA GO:0005509 GO:0016020 GO:0016614 GO:0030288 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
90.070.5884.710.010.901yiqA GO:0005509 GO:0009055 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0020037 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070968
100.070.5904.680.040.901flgA GO:0005509 GO:0006069 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0018468 GO:0030288 GO:0042597 GO:0046872 GO:0052934 GO:0052935 GO:0052936 GO:0055114
110.070.5944.720.030.914cvbA GO:0046872
120.070.6174.670.040.934tqoA GO:0005509 GO:0015946 GO:0016020 GO:0016614 GO:0018468 GO:0030288 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
130.070.5074.990.040.801w6sC GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0015945 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0030288 GO:0046872 GO:0052930 GO:0052931 GO:0052932 GO:0052933 GO:0055114
140.060.3375.940.070.613tkkA GO:0016811 GO:0046872
150.060.3166.060.050.573rd5A
160.060.2896.690.040.583q58A GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0006051 GO:0008152 GO:0016853 GO:0016857 GO:0019262 GO:0047465
170.060.3005.730.010.523clrD GO:0009055 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
180.060.2875.700.020.503p2lA GO:0004252 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0016787


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0046872
GO-Score 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0044710
GO-Score 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0030288 GO:0009279
GO-Score 0.13 0.13

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.