[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3845

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 5 4y28K CLA Rep, Mult 51,54,55,58,94
20.06 4 3bd7A CKB Rep, Mult 25,34,36,37
30.05 3 4n3eC 2AN Rep, Mult 56,60
40.05 3 3wmn1 CRT Rep, Mult 52,56
50.03 2 1xoiB 288 Rep, Mult 61,64,89,93
60.03 2 2iegA FRY Rep, Mult 33,58,62,93
70.03 2 5da5A CA Rep, Mult 60,63
80.03 2 3dylB MG Rep, Mult 29,47
90.02 1 2h9dD PYR Rep, Mult 49,52
100.02 1 2atfA NI Rep, Mult 45,47,104
110.02 1 2i14A ZN Rep, Mult 45,76,98
120.02 1 3dr2B CA Rep, Mult 61,76
130.02 1 2qn8A NBY Rep, Mult 20,23,24,27,72,73
140.02 1 1k77A MG Rep, Mult 97,98
150.02 1 1fx4A MG Rep, Mult 29,76
160.02 1 1ckjB WO4 Rep, Mult 75,88

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602qdgA0.4784.310.0380.8404.1.2.13NA
20.0601gz3A0.4155.070.0360.7981.1.1.38NA
30.0602qllA0.4044.790.0510.6982.4.1.156
40.0601e1yA0.3644.640.0430.6302.4.1.1NA
50.0601y2mB0.4815.100.0530.9164.3.1.24NA
60.0601adoA0.4594.740.0480.8324.1.2.13NA
70.0601fbaC0.4724.400.0650.8244.1.2.13NA
80.0602z1qB0.5764.240.0610.9581.3.99.325
90.0601fbvA0.5124.570.0640.8916.3.2.19NA
100.0602wyeB0.4984.350.0830.7983.5.1.97NA
110.0603gqbA0.4784.720.0550.8323.6.3.1490
120.0601ygpA0.5074.080.0300.8322.4.1.1NA
130.0603mc4A0.4943.930.0420.7902.3.1.3064,94
140.0602pffB0.4814.710.0460.8662.3.1.8625
150.0603dwcB0.4984.100.0590.7733.4.17.19NA
160.0601fdjA0.4624.410.0460.7904.1.2.13NA
170.0602nuwA0.4753.650.0570.7064.1.2.14NA
180.0601vncA0.4814.540.0350.8321.11.1.1023,25,32,61
190.0603hq2B0.4794.380.0480.8073.4.24.-NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.4494.590.050.805ez3B GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
10.070.4283.980.090.683u33A GO:0000062 GO:0003677 GO:0003995 GO:0005737 GO:0006974 GO:0008152 GO:0008470 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0033539 GO:0043565 GO:0045892 GO:0050660 GO:0052890 GO:0055088 GO:0055114
20.070.4244.830.120.762fonB GO:0000062 GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0003997 GO:0005777 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0016627 GO:0033539 GO:0050660 GO:0052890 GO:0055088 GO:0055114
30.070.3754.460.040.654x28C GO:0000062 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0016627 GO:0033539 GO:0050660 GO:0052890 GO:0055088 GO:0055114
40.070.4614.710.050.784y9jB GO:0000062 GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0005739 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0033539 GO:0050660 GO:0052890 GO:0055088 GO:0055114
50.070.4494.200.020.713mpiC GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0019439 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
60.070.4284.690.020.754rm7A GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
70.070.4314.390.040.712a1tC GO:0000062 GO:0003995 GO:0005634 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0005777 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0019254 GO:0030424 GO:0033539 GO:0042802 GO:0045329 GO:0050660 GO:0051791 GO:0051793 GO:0052890 GO:0055088 GO:0055114 GO:0070062 GO:0070991
80.070.3824.480.070.663nf4A GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
90.060.3824.660.060.681jqiA GO:0000062 GO:0003995 GO:0004085 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0031966 GO:0033539 GO:0042594 GO:0046359 GO:0050660 GO:0051289 GO:0051384 GO:0055088 GO:0055114
100.060.4074.950.040.734kcfA GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
110.060.4004.620.110.703mkhA GO:0000166 GO:0008152 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
120.060.4004.550.090.691is2A GO:0000062 GO:0003995 GO:0003997 GO:0005504 GO:0005777 GO:0006091 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0006693 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0016401 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0019395 GO:0033539 GO:0033540 GO:0050660 GO:0052890 GO:0055088 GO:0055114
130.060.4344.270.040.715af7B GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
140.060.4353.980.030.693mddA GO:0000062 GO:0001889 GO:0003995 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0005777 GO:0005978 GO:0006082 GO:0006111 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0007507 GO:0008152 GO:0009055 GO:0009409 GO:0009437 GO:0009791 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0019254 GO:0033539 GO:0042594 GO:0050660 GO:0051791 GO:0052890 GO:0055007 GO:0055088 GO:0055114 GO:0070991
150.060.3974.220.050.611r2jA GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
160.060.4054.260.070.671ivhA GO:0000062 GO:0003995 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0006552 GO:0008152 GO:0008470 GO:0009055 GO:0009083 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0033539 GO:0050660 GO:0052890 GO:0055088 GO:0055114
170.060.3584.910.030.624l1fA GO:0000166 GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
180.060.4005.150.050.753pfdC GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016491 GO:0000166 GO:0050662 GO:1901681
GO-Score 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.47
Biological Processes GO:0006635 GO:0048878
GO-Score 0.47 0.47
Cellular Component GO:0005739 GO:0005777
GO-Score 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.