[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3770c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 12 3iseR HEM Rep, Mult 31,35,50,54,57
20.08 13 1brxA RET Rep, Mult 77,81,84,108,112,127,130,131,134,151,158,176,180
30.06 8 3qbkA BR Rep, Mult 58,62,76,77,80,180
40.05 7 2at9A 2DP Rep, Mult 27,28,31,49,52,53,56,57,60,64
50.05 6 1qhjA PH1 Rep, Mult 26,33,146,174,177,178,181,182,185,189
60.04 6 1brrC ARC Rep, Mult 35,38,49,50,53,54
70.02 3 2i1xA SQU Rep, Mult 22,29,173,174,177,178,182,186
80.02 4 1p8hA LI1 Rep, Mult 20,24,25,27,28,60,64
90.02 4 3e1nE UNK Rep, Mult 30,56
100.02 3 1kmeA SQU Rep, Mult 47,50,51,54,58,83
110.01 2 3am6A CLR Rep, Mult 29,30,33,34,185,191
120.01 1 2r9rB PGW Rep, Mult 32,36
130.01 1 2i20A LI1 Rep, Mult 53,57,58,62
140.01 1 1rkvB MG Rep, Mult 148,162
150.01 1 2i1xA LI1 Rep, Mult 50,54,55,57,58
160.01 1 2hawA MG Rep, Mult 14,76,92,148
170.01 1 2zzlA SOG Rep, Mult 140,141,142,143,146
180.01 2 3oaxB 4E6 Rep, Mult 18,22,25,29,182
190.01 1 2hawA F Rep, Mult 12,14,76,148
200.01 1 2i1xA LI1 Rep, Mult 28,31,32,36,60

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601hxgA0.4865.010.0340.7804.2.3.9,4.1.99.7NA
20.0601n1zA0.4815.310.0600.8225.5.1.8NA
30.0601jswB0.4854.860.0640.7754.3.1.1NA
40.0601vdkA0.5364.090.0940.7544.2.1.2NA
50.0601f1oA0.5523.940.0580.7644.3.2.2NA
60.0602pfmA0.5453.720.0530.7494.3.2.2NA
70.0601k7wD0.5034.310.0300.7544.3.2.1NA
80.0601q5nA0.5214.110.0440.7385.5.1.2NA
90.0603bhgA0.5083.980.0560.7334.3.2.2NA
100.0602o6yA0.5144.360.0540.7494.3.1.-NA
110.0602qb0B0.3595.790.0640.6393.2.1.17NA
120.0601k62B0.5394.040.0690.7284.3.2.1NA
130.0602ewgA0.4815.100.1270.7852.5.1.10NA
140.0601qleA0.5134.710.0530.7751.9.3.1NA
150.0603npkA0.4994.290.0600.7442.5.1.10NA
160.0601tj7A0.5333.990.0630.7234.3.2.1NA
170.0601dcnB0.5324.100.0570.7284.3.2.1NA
180.0601m56A0.5094.890.0580.7911.9.3.1NA
190.0603gzhA0.4804.890.0240.7644.3.2.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.390.7882.550.130.931cwqA GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
10.330.7972.570.130.943qbgA GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
20.320.8352.140.120.934klyB GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0010461 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
30.300.7292.790.090.884yziA GO:0005216 GO:0006811 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0034220 GO:0046872
40.300.7972.680.160.952z55A GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
50.300.8282.430.150.954hyjA GO:0005216 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0010461 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220
60.280.8352.210.150.944knfC GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0010461 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
70.280.8182.310.150.945azdA GO:0005216 GO:0006811 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0034220
80.270.8172.520.100.954xtnA GO:0005216 GO:0006811 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0034220
90.250.7612.740.120.901c8sA GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
100.180.8321.930.180.924jq6B GO:0005216 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0010461 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220
110.170.7902.510.120.922ksyA GO:0005216 GO:0006811 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0034220
120.170.8002.590.140.941uazA GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
130.170.8212.340.130.953ddlA GO:0005216 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0010461 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220
140.160.7932.490.100.934qi1A GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
150.160.7892.550.110.934l35A GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
160.130.7043.400.140.922m3gA GO:0005216 GO:0006811 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0034220
170.130.7073.550.120.962l6xA GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0010461 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896
180.120.6902.620.080.831brdA GO:0005216 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007602 GO:0009881 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0034220 GO:0050896


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0009881 GO:0043169 GO:0010461
GO-Score 0.81 0.60 0.32
Biological Processes GO:0034220 GO:0018298 GO:0007602 GO:0015992
GO-Score 0.86 0.81 0.81 0.71
Cellular Component GO:0016021 GO:0005886
GO-Score 0.86 0.81

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.