[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3753c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.12 6 2no5A CNR Rep, Mult 37,40
20.08 4 5e9uG MG Rep, Mult 37,94
30.06 3 2btdA MG Rep, Mult 115,121,152
40.04 2 3rtdA III Rep, Mult 121,126,129,130
50.04 2 3cr3A MG Rep, Mult 97,115,121
60.02 1 3dc7B MG Rep, Mult 120,121
70.02 1 1y7pC RIP Rep, Mult 74,76,106,132
80.02 1 3rt9A COA Rep, Mult 28,36,89
90.02 1 2b0qA MG Rep, Mult 115,134
100.02 1 5dnmG RAX Rep, Mult 42,45
110.02 1 1t0lA NAP Rep, Mult 87,91,94
120.02 1 1yt3A ZN Rep, Mult 59,104
130.02 1 3g1fC 2OM Rep, Mult 79,81

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0672bkrA0.5934.430.0640.9223.4.22.-NA
20.0601avpA0.5634.270.0740.8493.4.22.39NA
30.0603ktnA0.4825.040.0460.8072.7.1.45NA
40.0601vi9A0.4865.210.0560.8492.7.1.35129
50.0601t09B0.5004.290.0540.7411.1.1.4266,74
60.0603blvC0.4864.790.0440.7471.1.1.4180
70.0603h74A0.4925.080.0380.8252.7.1.35NA
80.0601jxiA0.4975.130.1010.8432.7.4.7117
90.0601zorA0.4944.360.0480.7411.1.1.42NA
100.0601euvA0.5904.480.0730.8983.4.22.68NA
110.0602ddmB0.4934.970.0840.8372.7.1.35NA
120.0602agsA0.4934.870.0480.8133.2.1.1815,127
130.0602qfwD0.4874.010.0270.7051.1.1.42NA
140.0601cnzA0.4674.760.1410.7531.1.1.85NA
150.0602qcvA0.4914.990.0990.8072.7.1.92NA
160.0601wd8A0.4614.870.1260.7473.5.3.15NA
170.0601kb0A0.4844.970.0750.8311.1.99.-NA
180.0602i5bA0.4975.060.0700.8372.7.4.7NA
190.0602fv7A0.4944.890.0980.8072.7.1.15NA
200.0602f10A0.4415.660.0340.8493.2.1.18NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.120.6843.580.070.955dggA GO:0016020 GO:0016021
10.080.5934.430.060.922bkrA GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008234 GO:0016787
20.070.5934.190.080.862oixA GO:0006508 GO:0008234
30.070.5864.510.040.912xphA GO:0004175 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005925 GO:0006508 GO:0006919 GO:0008233 GO:0008234 GO:0010724 GO:0016787 GO:0016925 GO:0016926 GO:0016929 GO:0031965 GO:0032435 GO:0045944 GO:0070139 GO:0097190
40.070.5994.440.080.903zo5A GO:0001934 GO:0004175 GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0006810 GO:0007507 GO:0008233 GO:0008234 GO:0009950 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016055 GO:0016604 GO:0016605 GO:0016787 GO:0016925 GO:0016926 GO:0016929 GO:0019904 GO:0030111 GO:0031397 GO:0031398 GO:0031410 GO:0031648 GO:0031965 GO:0032091 GO:0032875 GO:0035562 GO:0043518 GO:0045444 GO:0045944 GO:0051028 GO:0051246 GO:0060707 GO:0060711 GO:0060712 GO:0070139 GO:1901797 GO:2000045
50.070.5904.480.070.901euvA GO:0000086 GO:0004175 GO:0005635 GO:0005643 GO:0005730 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008234 GO:0016787 GO:0016926 GO:0016929
60.070.5794.350.080.893eayA GO:0005622 GO:0005634 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008234 GO:0016787
70.070.4515.400.060.802ac1A GO:0004553 GO:0004564 GO:0004575 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005886 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0009611 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0048046 GO:0080167
80.060.3695.530.040.661wchA GO:0004721 GO:0004725 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005856 GO:0005886 GO:0006470 GO:0014066 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0030027 GO:0035335 GO:0036312 GO:0042995 GO:0043005 GO:0044297 GO:0070062
90.060.3465.840.040.673debA GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0020002 GO:0030430 GO:0033619 GO:0033644 GO:0044156 GO:0044164 GO:0044221 GO:0044231 GO:0045955 GO:0046872 GO:0050827 GO:0051609
100.060.3385.790.090.653ey5A GO:0004596 GO:0006474 GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0031248
110.060.3525.640.060.641wdwE GO:0000162 GO:0003824 GO:0004834 GO:0006568 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0009073 GO:0016829
120.060.3385.090.030.605bqnA GO:0004222 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0008320 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0020002 GO:0030430 GO:0033644 GO:0044156 GO:0044164 GO:0044221 GO:0044231 GO:0046872 GO:0050827 GO:0051609 GO:0071806
130.060.2894.350.040.453jb9e GO:0000398 GO:0005634 GO:0005681 GO:0005684 GO:0006397 GO:0008380 GO:0045292
140.060.2835.460.080.524f0cA GO:0016740
150.060.3085.090.030.521uhnA GO:0005509 GO:0005773 GO:0005774 GO:0009705 GO:0016020 GO:0019722 GO:0022626 GO:0046872 GO:0055075
160.060.3064.120.110.451r1pB GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005768
170.060.3304.720.050.553tj1A GO:0000182 GO:0001042 GO:0001082 GO:0001179 GO:0001180 GO:0001181 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006356
180.060.3445.150.090.603tixD GO:0000122 GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003727 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005816 GO:0005856 GO:0006348 GO:0007049 GO:0007059 GO:0030466 GO:0030958 GO:0031047 GO:0031048 GO:0031493 GO:0031508 GO:0031618 GO:0031934 GO:0034507 GO:0034613 GO:0035064 GO:0044732 GO:0071459 GO:1990141 GO:1990707


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0070011
GO-Score 0.51
Biological Processes GO:0019538
GO-Score 0.51
Cellular Component GO:0031965 GO:0016021 GO:0031410 GO:0016605 GO:0005925 GO:0005643
GO-Score 0.13 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.