[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3735

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 1 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.74 12 2gl0A ADN Rep, Mult 17,92,94,113,114,159
20.34 7 2gl0A ADN Rep, Mult 24,25,82
30.13 3 2gl0D ADN Rep, Mult 17,92,113,114,115
40.02 1 1lm1A F3S Rep, Mult 30,31,32,35,36,37,46,61,62

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602z86C0.4375.250.0590.7722.4.1.175,2.4.1.22698
20.0601eqrA0.4304.620.0450.6606.1.1.1244
30.0601ct9A0.4544.970.0530.7906.3.5.4NA
40.0603ikmD0.4373.700.0590.6242.7.7.7NA
50.0601x87A0.4354.740.0580.7044.2.1.49NA
60.0601htoA0.4413.950.0300.6176.3.1.2NA
70.0601moqA0.3554.770.0480.5862.6.1.1651
80.0601gehC0.4363.910.0610.6244.1.1.3935
90.0603l4gB0.4284.790.0830.6856.1.1.20NA
100.0602fknB0.4714.000.0580.6984.2.1.49NA
110.0602vdcF0.5084.140.0510.7721.4.1.13NA
120.0601ea0A0.5074.130.0510.7651.4.1.1337
130.0602zxqA0.4394.460.0250.7043.2.1.9723
140.0601t3tA0.4564.720.0510.7476.3.5.321
150.0602jguA0.4233.770.0550.5622.7.7.7NA
160.0603hmjA0.4294.990.0430.7652.3.1.8664
170.0601jxaA0.4315.290.0960.7782.6.1.16NA
180.0603gueA0.4304.830.0870.7222.7.7.9153,161
190.0601qk1A0.4254.880.0560.7102.7.3.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.690.9481.450.530.992gl0A GO:0000166
10.110.3683.280.060.492bj3C GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0010045 GO:0016151 GO:0046872
20.060.3885.200.080.694kxwA GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005777 GO:0005829 GO:0005999 GO:0006098 GO:0008152 GO:0009052 GO:0016740 GO:0031982 GO:0040008 GO:0042803 GO:0043209 GO:0046166 GO:0046872 GO:0048037 GO:0070062
30.060.3095.540.080.563qvfA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
40.060.4105.120.060.683hlfA GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016787 GO:0017000 GO:0030639 GO:0050832
50.060.3565.100.100.614fo4A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0003938 GO:0006164 GO:0006177 GO:0009152 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
60.060.3725.080.050.665bxpA GO:0004553 GO:0004563 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0047403
70.060.3455.530.060.612jg1A GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005975 GO:0005988 GO:0009024 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019512 GO:2001059
80.060.3925.600.030.724c20B GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0005996 GO:0006004 GO:0008736 GO:0016853 GO:0016861 GO:0019317 GO:0030145 GO:0042355 GO:0046872
90.060.3655.050.100.601r1zA GO:0000139 GO:0005509 GO:0005537 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0005793 GO:0005794 GO:0006810 GO:0006888 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016192 GO:0030246 GO:0033116 GO:0042802 GO:0043231 GO:0046872
100.060.3773.640.140.534hacA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004496 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0008152 GO:0008299 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019287
110.060.3255.280.080.593ofvB GO:0004045 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0016787
120.060.3124.400.050.481j6oA GO:0004536 GO:0006308 GO:0016788
130.060.3444.910.050.583gh4A GO:0004553 GO:0004563 GO:0005975
140.060.3295.630.060.623cesA GO:0002098 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0008033 GO:0016491 GO:0030488 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
150.060.3735.090.080.643w6zA GO:0000166 GO:0004616 GO:0016491 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
160.060.3115.810.090.591x19A GO:0008168 GO:0008171 GO:0016740 GO:0032259 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051539
170.060.3895.270.030.664z38B GO:0003824 GO:0004314 GO:0008152 GO:0016740
180.060.3734.050.120.564mksA GO:0000015 GO:0000287 GO:0004634 GO:0005576 GO:0005737 GO:0006096 GO:0009986 GO:0016829 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0000166 GO:0043169
GO-Score 0.71 0.33
Biological Processes GO:0010045 GO:0006355 GO:0040008 GO:0009052 GO:0046166 GO:0005999 GO:0016310 GO:0050832 GO:0017000 GO:0030639
GO-Score 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Cellular Component GO:0070062 GO:0005829 GO:0005654 GO:0005777 GO:0043209
GO-Score 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.