[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3722c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 1 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.63 131 2zyjA PGU Rep, Mult 36,37,99,100,101,139,184,189,218,220,221,254,256,257,264,392
20.40 108 1b4xA MAE Rep, Mult 36,37,139,189,257,349,392
30.06 18 1bjwB PO4 Rep, Mult 139,189,349,392
40.05 15 1gc3A TRP Rep, Mult 35,36,37,38,189,349,392
50.02 9 4r2nB PHE Rep, Mult 101,139,140,141,189,393
60.02 7 5hxxA GLU Rep, Mult 69,287
70.02 8 2zp7E LEU Rep, Mult 19,23,37,139,189,257,392
80.01 3 2r2nA KYN Rep, Mult 19,20,37,38,69,287
90.00 1 3athA AKG Rep, Mult 219,220,221,222,223,251,253,254,258,267
100.00 2 2r2nC KYN Rep, Mult 19,20,37,38,69
110.00 2 2x5dA LLP Rep, Mult 36,37,38,39,189,220,221,255,256,258,261,314,348,392
120.00 1 3aowA AKG Rep, Mult 20,139,141
130.00 1 3av7A KYA Rep, Mult 17,19,20,140,144,374,378,385
140.00 2 2zc0A IMD Rep, Mult 143,144,147,378,380
150.00 2 4gdyA 0X1 Rep, Mult 19,20,37,38,69,70,72,287
160.00 1 3ue8A 09M Rep, Mult 37,69
170.00 2 2xh1B UUU Rep, Mult 37,38,69,70,71,287
180.00 1 2dou0 III Rep, Mult 54,101,102,105,106,124,139,144,150,261,262,263,264,284,285,286,290

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.4922zyjA0.7412.850.1720.8302.6.1.39139,218,257
20.4522douA0.6963.050.1550.7862.-.-.-139,218,257
30.3301d2fB0.7052.920.1390.7934.4.1.8139,218,257
40.3261o4sB0.6813.120.1470.7752.6.1.179
50.3211uu1C0.6073.460.1330.7152.6.1.9139,218,257
60.2822f8jC0.6103.390.1360.7132.6.1.9139,220,257,261
70.2731j32A0.6993.200.1300.8022.6.1.1218,257
80.2511b5oA0.6953.060.1490.7862.6.1.1218,257
90.1963cq5B0.6483.420.1330.7592.6.1.9NA
100.1351v2eA0.6793.140.1520.7792.6.1.15218,248,257
110.1332zc0A0.7362.890.1730.8252.6.1.44139,257
120.1311gd9A0.7063.140.1380.8092.6.1.-NA
130.1123eucB0.6353.410.1270.7452.6.1.998,100,221,256,262
140.1071fg3A0.6403.330.1080.7472.6.1.9139,218
150.0842qlrA0.7033.230.1530.7982.6.1.39,2.6.1.7139,218
160.0761wstA0.7522.880.1760.8392.6.1.-139,218,257
170.0703fvsA0.6993.440.1220.8142.6.1.7,2.6.1.64,4.4.1.1384
180.0603mebA0.6823.740.1100.8212.6.1.1190,218,221,256,347,349
190.0601ajrA0.6903.480.0900.8112.6.1.1218
200.0602z20A0.6823.490.1130.7932.6.1.83NA
210.0602r2nA0.7043.210.1530.7982.6.1.39,2.6.1.7137,162,341,349,378
220.0602r5cA0.6943.600.1280.8182.6.1.64218
230.0601yaaA0.6843.690.1100.8142.6.1.1218,254
240.0601x0mA0.7542.640.1820.8322.6.1.7139,218,257
250.0603g7qA0.6733.450.1840.7842.6.1.66144
260.0603if2A0.7173.440.1320.8352.6.1.-NA
270.0603ihjA0.7143.750.1160.8512.6.1.2218,257
280.0601ajsA0.6913.620.0960.8232.6.1.1218,221,257
290.0602zjgA0.6923.380.1320.8052.6.1.7,2.6.1.64139,218
300.0603dydA0.7112.960.1220.8052.6.1.5218
310.0601iayA0.7153.330.1270.8284.4.1.14218,257
320.0602z61A0.6832.920.1360.7682.6.1.1139,218
330.0601yaaB0.6853.740.1120.8182.6.1.1218,221,254,257

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.700.9710.831.000.985c6uA GO:0003824 GO:0005576 GO:0008483 GO:0016740 GO:0040007
10.670.9441.410.550.975hxxA GO:0003824 GO:0004069 GO:0008483 GO:0016740 GO:0080130
20.640.9291.160.560.953d6kC GO:0003824
30.570.9231.570.430.953ez1B GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0016740
40.390.7412.850.170.832zyjA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0019878 GO:0030170 GO:0047536
50.380.7652.840.160.851vp4A GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
60.360.7303.380.140.853if2A GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
70.360.6953.060.150.791b5oA GO:0003824 GO:0004069 GO:0005737 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170 GO:0080130
80.350.7522.880.180.841wstA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
90.340.7362.890.170.832zc0A GO:0003824 GO:0008453 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
100.340.7063.140.140.811gd9A GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
110.340.7062.970.150.804my5A GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
120.330.7063.220.150.804gdyB GO:0003824 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0006103 GO:0006536 GO:0006554 GO:0006569 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016212 GO:0016740 GO:0019441 GO:0030170 GO:0033512 GO:0042803 GO:0047536 GO:0070189 GO:0097052
130.330.7103.160.150.812x5dD GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
140.320.6943.380.110.803ei7A GO:0003824 GO:0005507 GO:0005829 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0009089 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0009570 GO:0009735 GO:0009862 GO:0010285 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
150.320.7153.330.130.831iayA GO:0003824 GO:0009058 GO:0009693 GO:0009835 GO:0016829 GO:0016847 GO:0030170 GO:0042218
160.290.7532.680.180.833aovA GO:0003824 GO:0009058 GO:0030170
170.260.6813.120.150.771o4sB GO:0003824 GO:0004069 GO:0005737 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170 GO:0080130
180.260.6973.450.170.813g7qA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009042 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
190.210.6623.690.120.793p6kB
200.180.6573.700.120.794m2jA GO:0003824 GO:0008483 GO:0009058 GO:0016740 GO:0030170
210.110.7003.290.140.813dzzA GO:0003824 GO:0009058 GO:0030170
220.060.2967.160.040.482vkdA GO:0000166 GO:0009405 GO:0016757 GO:0046872
230.060.2946.140.040.443kc2B GO:0046474


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004069 GO:0080130 GO:0030170 GO:0047536
GO-Score 0.67 0.67 0.39 0.39
Biological Processes GO:0040007 GO:0019878
GO-Score 0.70 0.39
Cellular Component GO:0005576
GO-Score 0.70

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.