[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3719

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.54 62 4p8hA FAD Rep, Mult 2,45,46,47,48,49,50,54,56,66,86,108,109,110,113,114,116,117,120,121,123,124,169,170,173,174,175,427
20.07 9 1w1qA ZIP Rep, Mult 109,315,325,341,343,368,395,397,428
30.06 8 3dq0A MZO Rep, Mult 109,124,315,325,341,343,368,395,397,427,428
40.01 1 5hhzA ZME Rep, Mult 109,335,397
50.01 1 4fdpA IMD Rep, Mult 74,76

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.2703d2jA0.7503.500.1370.8701.21.3.343,45,50,116,170,173
20.2132vfvA0.7252.930.1680.8131.1.3.41113,170
30.0921diiA0.7194.250.0950.8771.17.99.1NA
40.0881ahuA0.7244.130.1010.8661.1.3.38,1.1.3.13NA
50.0662q85A0.4954.590.0780.6211.1.1.158NA
60.0602e1qA0.3915.960.0510.5451.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
70.0601i19A0.7123.260.1110.8131.1.3.6NA
80.0601zxiC0.3465.060.1320.4511.2.99.246,50,87,89,117
90.0602b3xA0.3707.660.0410.6364.2.1.3NA
100.0603b9jJ0.3384.950.0830.4321.17.1.4,1.17.3.2116
110.0603b9jI0.1604.990.0690.2111.17.1.4,1.17.3.2119
120.0602gqtA0.4193.910.1190.5001.1.1.15850,52,116,132,168
130.0601bxrA0.3527.320.0370.5776.3.5.5NA
140.0602uuvD0.6964.040.1230.8402.5.1.2651,55,116,136,171
150.0602aw5B0.3487.790.0470.6021.1.1.40NA
160.0602j5wA0.3777.500.0400.6451.16.3.1NA
170.0605acnA0.3527.680.0300.6134.2.1.3NA
180.0601no3A0.3456.940.0360.5551.13.11.12NA
190.0601ffuC0.3475.070.1230.4511.2.99.250,117
200.0601gq2A0.3457.740.0460.5961.1.1.4023
210.0603dq0A0.8992.080.1820.9471.5.99.12NA
220.0603b9jC0.3057.010.0520.4891.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
230.0601ea0A0.3417.410.0400.5771.4.1.13NA
240.0601f0xA0.6864.380.1040.8401.1.1.2889

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.540.8651.440.200.894o95A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0009690 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0019139 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
10.470.8461.370.200.874oalA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0009690 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0019139 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
20.400.9221.310.210.944ml8A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0009690 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0019139 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
30.400.8671.300.210.894mlaB GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0009690 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0019139 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
40.370.8931.900.170.942exrA GO:0003824 GO:0009690 GO:0009823 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0019139 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
50.340.9012.120.180.953s1eA GO:0003824 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0009690 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0019139 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
60.300.7342.980.170.824autA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0003885 GO:0005737 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0045227 GO:0050660 GO:0055114 GO:0071555
70.280.7463.240.160.844p8lA GO:0003824 GO:0003885 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0045227 GO:0050660 GO:0055114 GO:0071555
80.270.7233.830.140.865adzC GO:0003824 GO:0005730 GO:0005739 GO:0005777 GO:0005778 GO:0006629 GO:0008609 GO:0008610 GO:0008611 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0016740 GO:0043231 GO:0050660 GO:0055114 GO:0071949
90.260.7573.170.110.863rj8A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0046562 GO:0046872 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
100.260.7292.890.160.804ncrA GO:0003824 GO:0003885 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0035884 GO:0040007 GO:0045227 GO:0050660 GO:0055114 GO:0070592 GO:0071555
110.260.7252.820.160.804p8mB GO:0003824 GO:0003885 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0045227 GO:0050660 GO:0055114 GO:0071555
120.250.7533.570.130.884ud8A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005618 GO:0009506 GO:0009793 GO:0010197 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0045551 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
130.250.7503.500.140.873d2jA GO:0003824 GO:0009820 GO:0016023 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0031410 GO:0050468 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
140.220.7523.380.140.873w8wB GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
150.220.7543.370.120.864pveA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
160.210.7252.930.170.812vfrA GO:0003824 GO:0003885 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0050582 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
170.210.7293.810.130.853pm9A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
180.210.7273.320.140.842bvfA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0018530 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
190.210.7493.520.120.875d79A GO:0003824 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
200.190.7503.100.120.842axrA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0046872 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
210.190.7523.480.110.873vteA GO:0003824 GO:0005576 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0048046 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
220.160.6593.940.130.792uuvC GO:0003824 GO:0005777 GO:0006629 GO:0008609 GO:0008610 GO:0008611 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0016740 GO:0043178 GO:0044351 GO:0050660 GO:0055114 GO:0071949
230.130.7513.460.130.874dnsA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
240.130.7333.890.130.875adzA GO:0003824 GO:0005730 GO:0005739 GO:0005777 GO:0005778 GO:0006629 GO:0008609 GO:0008610 GO:0008611 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0016740 GO:0043231 GO:0050660 GO:0055114 GO:0071949


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0050660 GO:0016614 GO:0019139
GO-Score 0.94 0.94 0.94
Biological Processes GO:0055114 GO:0009823
GO-Score 0.94 0.37
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.