[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3705c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 4 1h3uB NAG Rep, Mult 91,113,186
20.06 3 2ckjA FES Rep, Mult 117,119,121,183,184,185
30.06 3 3jadA SY9 Rep, Mult 96,107,109,179,181,188
40.06 3 1py2B ZN Rep, Mult 125,129
50.04 2 3eubS FES Rep, Mult 132,133,134,136,153
60.02 1 2zyqB TAR Rep, Mult 30,31
70.02 1 3uufA MAN Rep, Mult 101,102
80.02 1 1t5bA FMN Rep, Mult 38,43
90.02 1 2bq8X ZN Rep, Mult 81,85
100.02 1 4flfA XXH Rep, Mult 116,118
110.02 1 4zr2A RET Rep, Mult 71,180,189
120.02 1 4xniA 78M Rep, Mult 120,127
130.02 1 3kdnA CAP Rep, Mult 151,211
140.02 1 1mpxA CA Rep, Mult 81,84,87,92
150.02 1 2ckjC FES Rep, Mult 43,47,49,97

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601t3qB0.4235.150.0320.6781.3.99.17NA
20.0601nyqB0.4035.320.0500.6646.1.1.3NA
30.0601n63B0.4315.080.0530.6821.2.99.2NA
40.0602c6fA0.4065.750.0870.6963.4.15.1NA
50.0602vsmA0.3525.820.0660.6083.2.1.18NA
60.0601f1sA0.3575.820.0600.6224.2.2.1183
70.0602cqsA0.4374.760.0410.6262.4.1.20NA
80.0602e1qA0.4155.850.0560.7291.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
90.0602wafA0.4464.380.0460.6173.4.-.-NA
100.0602ow6A0.4195.480.0700.6873.2.1.114121
110.0603b9jI0.2425.070.0630.3831.17.1.4,1.17.3.2207
120.0602e0wB0.4195.580.0540.7242.3.2.2180
130.0601z11A0.3036.080.0550.5511.14.14.1176
140.0602z8kC0.3495.290.0550.5702.3.2.278,123,124,133
150.0603b9jJ0.3306.080.0700.5891.17.1.4,1.17.3.255
160.0601i8qA0.4045.030.0430.6174.2.2.1111
170.0602ckjA0.4285.380.0380.6921.17.1.4,1.17.3.2NA
180.0601ffuB0.4305.100.0320.6821.2.99.2NA
190.0603fwmA0.4434.890.0530.6592.4.1.129,NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.410.8601.090.190.894esqA GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0005524 GO:0005618 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006468 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0043085 GO:0043086 GO:0043388 GO:0045893 GO:0045926 GO:0046777 GO:0046890 GO:0052572
10.070.4823.520.050.624rthA GO:0005509 GO:0009523 GO:0009654 GO:0015979 GO:0019898
20.070.4664.230.080.652xb3A GO:0005509 GO:0009523 GO:0009654 GO:0015979 GO:0019898 GO:0046872
30.070.5033.960.030.672lnjA GO:0005509 GO:0009523 GO:0009654 GO:0015979 GO:0019898
40.070.4643.490.070.592vu4A GO:0005509 GO:0009507 GO:0009523 GO:0009535 GO:0009536 GO:0009579 GO:0009654 GO:0015979 GO:0016020 GO:0019898
50.070.4673.580.070.601v2bB GO:0005509 GO:0009507 GO:0009523 GO:0009535 GO:0009536 GO:0009579 GO:0009654 GO:0015979 GO:0016020 GO:0019898
60.070.4624.050.050.644rtiA GO:0005509 GO:0009507 GO:0009523 GO:0009535 GO:0009536 GO:0009579 GO:0009654 GO:0015979 GO:0016020 GO:0019898
70.060.3036.290.050.574n0qB GO:0006810 GO:0006865
80.060.3196.090.050.574w8jA GO:0005102 GO:0006952 GO:0009405 GO:0030435
90.060.2816.090.050.502yntA GO:0046872
100.060.3105.710.070.524pz2B GO:0004029 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0055114
110.060.3196.090.020.572i7xA GO:0003723 GO:0005634 GO:0005847 GO:0005849 GO:0006378 GO:0006379 GO:0006397 GO:0098789
120.060.3325.340.040.553h3eA GO:0016787 GO:0046872
130.060.3465.270.070.584qi7A GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0016491 GO:0016614 GO:0030248 GO:0047735 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
140.060.3016.230.060.561onkA GO:0006952 GO:0016787 GO:0017148 GO:0030246 GO:0030598
150.060.3706.070.050.695c97A GO:0000209 GO:0002480 GO:0004177 GO:0005576 GO:0005622 GO:0005765 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006508 GO:0007165 GO:0007267 GO:0007565 GO:0008217 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0008270 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0030163 GO:0030659 GO:0031905 GO:0042277 GO:0043171 GO:0046872 GO:0048471 GO:0060395 GO:0061024 GO:0070006
160.060.3025.510.070.514uttA GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0006051 GO:0008152 GO:0016853 GO:0016857 GO:0019262 GO:0047465
170.060.2696.370.050.523pmqA GO:0009055 GO:0046872
180.060.3315.940.080.593g5sA GO:0005737 GO:0008033 GO:0008168 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0030698 GO:0032259 GO:0047151 GO:0050660 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0046872 GO:0005524 GO:0004674
GO-Score 0.47 0.41 0.41
Biological Processes GO:0043086 GO:0045926 GO:0043085 GO:0045893 GO:0043388 GO:0046890 GO:0052572 GO:0046777
GO-Score 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41
Cellular Component GO:0009521 GO:0042651 GO:1990204 GO:0005887 GO:0005618
GO-Score 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.41 0.41

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.