[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3698

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.16 10 3ig8A MG Rep, Mult 69,98,105,210
20.16 8 3ig8A MG Rep, Mult 67,210,353
30.07 4 3lvvA MG Rep, Mult 67,96,105
40.07 5 2gwdA GLU Rep, Mult 69,99,206,207,208,254,258,355
50.06 4 2gwcA BSC Rep, Mult 69,99,100,168,171,199,206,207,208,254,258,334,355
60.05 3 2d33B AF3 Rep, Mult 67,98,105,210,355
70.04 3 2d32A ANP Rep, Mult 63,65,66,67,105,107,108,109,110,210,212,213,214,340,351,353

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.2712gwdA0.7561.970.1780.7966.3.2.265,67,124
20.0672d33A0.6194.290.0930.7476.3.2.265,67,69,330,355
30.0603ig5A0.7633.880.1420.8946.3.2.2NA
40.0601nekA0.3297.130.0450.5231.3.99.1,212
50.0602gq3A0.3398.050.0510.5872.3.3.9NA
60.0601ea0A0.3427.600.0340.5661.4.1.13NA
70.0601kb0A0.3716.450.0370.5541.1.99.-NA
80.0601kv9A0.3696.930.0230.5741.1.99.-NA
90.0601qleA0.3267.300.0390.5261.9.3.1NA
100.0602gbcA0.3228.120.0360.5703.4.14.5,3.4.15.5NA
110.0602wdqA0.3347.280.0480.5381.3.99.1NA
120.0601f1hL0.4214.610.1100.5216.3.1.269
130.0603g0bB0.3427.750.0390.5803.4.14.5128
140.0601orvA0.3317.180.0300.5253.4.14.5NA
150.0601lgrA0.4154.340.1100.5056.3.1.2NA
160.0602uu7A0.3464.000.0820.4096.3.1.2NA
170.0601ygpA0.3437.610.0710.5722.4.1.1NA
180.0601ofdA0.3557.410.0390.5781.4.7.1NA
190.0603nztA0.6064.430.1110.7416.3.2.265,67,105,124,355
200.0602epoA0.3356.780.0480.5173.2.1.52NA
210.0601htoA0.4234.650.1060.5256.3.1.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.450.7633.930.140.903ig8A GO:0000166 GO:0004357 GO:0005524 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006750 GO:0016874 GO:0017109 GO:0042542 GO:0046686
10.340.6194.300.090.752d32A GO:0000166 GO:0004357 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0006750 GO:0006972 GO:0016874 GO:0046872 GO:0071243 GO:0071288
20.300.7401.990.180.782gwcF GO:0000166 GO:0004357 GO:0005524 GO:0006750 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0016874 GO:0042398
30.240.6272.770.140.691r8gB GO:0000166 GO:0004357 GO:0005524 GO:0016874 GO:0016879 GO:0042398
40.190.5824.400.100.703ln6A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0004357 GO:0004363 GO:0005524 GO:0006750 GO:0008152 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
50.180.5814.580.130.723ln7A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0004357 GO:0004363 GO:0005524 GO:0006750 GO:0008152 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
60.170.6064.430.110.743nztA GO:0000166 GO:0004357 GO:0005524 GO:0006750 GO:0016874
70.070.6202.740.140.681tt4A GO:0000166 GO:0004357 GO:0005524 GO:0016874 GO:0016879 GO:0042398
80.060.2937.800.040.493pukA GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0006887 GO:0006904 GO:0007420 GO:0015031 GO:0015758 GO:0016020 GO:0016192 GO:0016323 GO:0016324 GO:0017075 GO:0019905 GO:0022615 GO:0030073 GO:0031091 GO:0032868 GO:0042581 GO:0043312 GO:0045955 GO:0051291 GO:0061024 GO:0070062 GO:0070527 GO:0070820
90.060.2467.660.030.404ribB GO:0000287 GO:0000724 GO:0003677 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0004527 GO:0004528 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0006281 GO:0006289 GO:0006974 GO:0008409 GO:0016787 GO:0016788 GO:0017108 GO:0033683 GO:0036297 GO:0043130 GO:0045171 GO:0046872 GO:0070336
100.060.2677.740.030.453lmmD GO:0005524
110.060.2537.230.050.404rebA GO:0000287 GO:0000724 GO:0003677 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0004527 GO:0004528 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0006281 GO:0006289 GO:0006974 GO:0008409 GO:0016787 GO:0016788 GO:0017108 GO:0033683 GO:0036297 GO:0043130 GO:0045171 GO:0046872 GO:0070336
120.060.2567.400.050.414uoxC GO:0003824 GO:0003992 GO:0005829 GO:0006526 GO:0008483 GO:0009447 GO:0016740 GO:0030170 GO:0033094 GO:0042802
130.060.2326.700.030.362ewvA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006810
140.060.2487.560.050.413uowB GO:0003921 GO:0003922 GO:0005524 GO:0005829 GO:0006164 GO:0006177 GO:0016462 GO:0016874
150.060.2567.840.040.444xviA GO:0000724 GO:0003676 GO:0003677 GO:0003887 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0006260 GO:0006261 GO:0006281 GO:0006974 GO:0008409 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0019985 GO:0030332 GO:0036297 GO:0090305
160.060.2597.440.040.424recA GO:0000287 GO:0000724 GO:0003677 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0004527 GO:0004528 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0006281 GO:0006289 GO:0006974 GO:0008409 GO:0016787 GO:0016788 GO:0017108 GO:0033683 GO:0036297 GO:0043130 GO:0045171 GO:0046872 GO:0070336
170.060.2257.440.040.382fglA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0031176 GO:0045493 GO:0046872
180.060.2036.500.030.304p7aA GO:0000289 GO:0000712 GO:0000793 GO:0000794 GO:0000795 GO:0001673 GO:0002204 GO:0003682 GO:0003697 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005694 GO:0005712 GO:0006281 GO:0006298 GO:0006303 GO:0006974 GO:0007049 GO:0007060 GO:0007126 GO:0007129 GO:0007131 GO:0007140 GO:0007283 GO:0008630 GO:0016020 GO:0016321 GO:0016446 GO:0016447 GO:0016887 GO:0030983 GO:0032137 GO:0032389 GO:0032407 GO:0043060 GO:0045132 GO:0045141 GO:0045143 GO:0045190 GO:0045950 GO:0048477 GO:0051257


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005524 GO:0004357 GO:0046914
GO-Score 0.84 0.84 0.38
Biological Processes GO:0006750 GO:0042542 GO:0046686 GO:0071243 GO:0071288 GO:0006972
GO-Score 0.80 0.45 0.45 0.34 0.34 0.34
Cellular Component GO:0017109 GO:0005829 GO:0009507
GO-Score 0.45 0.34 0.30

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.