[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3645

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.22 14 1wc0A APC Rep, Mult 365,407,414,473,474,475,479,480,483,484,523
20.17 10 1y10B CA Rep, Mult 367,368,369,411
30.08 6 1wc0B APC Rep, Mult 367,368,369,370,371,372,409,410,411
40.07 5 4cm0A APC Rep, Mult 54,55,56,57,58,59,170,409,474,479,480,483,484,524
50.04 3 1wc6A MG Rep, Mult 367,409,411,412
60.01 1 2ckjD FES Rep, Mult 454,455,456,476,477,478,481,483
70.01 1 2ckjA FES Rep, Mult 453,454,483,484,485,486
80.01 1 3eubS FES Rep, Mult 457,458,459,475,476,477,478
90.01 1 2bw7A ECS Rep, Mult 365,367,409,412,480,483,484,486,487

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.1301y11A0.3474.310.1760.4104.6.1.1484
20.0603fg3A0.2367.540.0440.3794.2.1.92,1.13.11.40NA
30.0603b9jI0.1445.270.0610.1911.17.1.4,1.17.3.2189,374,408,450
40.0601ahuA0.3236.850.0550.4901.1.3.38,1.1.3.13NA
50.0602vdcF0.3357.480.0390.5451.4.1.13NA
60.0602qllA0.3207.550.0310.5142.4.1.1NA
70.0602b3xA0.3358.020.0320.5594.2.1.3NA
80.0601kqfA0.3217.730.0450.5281.2.1.2NA
90.0603gpbA0.3187.290.0500.4972.4.1.1529
100.0603hhsB0.3197.620.0370.5171.14.18.1299
110.0601t3tA0.3637.670.0520.5966.3.5.322
120.0603h09B0.3327.850.0410.5573.4.21.72NA
130.0602e1qA0.3357.070.0430.5231.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
140.0603dy5A0.3247.150.0390.5031.13.11.40,4.2.1.92NA
150.0603cf4A0.3197.800.0510.5251.2.99.2417
160.0602vdcA0.3357.400.0430.5371.4.1.13NA
170.0601l5jA0.3207.430.0600.5084.2.1.3483
180.0602ckjA0.3097.860.0290.5171.17.1.4,1.17.3.2435
190.0603b9jC0.2567.480.0440.4101.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.310.3072.640.290.331wc4A GO:0000155 GO:0000160 GO:0004016 GO:0005622 GO:0006171 GO:0007165 GO:0009190 GO:0016310 GO:0016772 GO:0016829 GO:0016849 GO:0018298 GO:0023014 GO:0035556 GO:0046872
10.270.7392.940.150.804oyzA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003351 GO:0004016 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005829 GO:0005856 GO:0005886 GO:0005929 GO:0006171 GO:0007283 GO:0009190 GO:0015630 GO:0016020 GO:0016829 GO:0016849 GO:0030145 GO:0030424 GO:0030425 GO:0030426 GO:0031514 GO:0035556 GO:0042995 GO:0043025 GO:0043065 GO:0045177 GO:0045178 GO:0046872 GO:0048471 GO:0051117 GO:0071241 GO:0071890
20.230.3842.590.180.424yutA GO:0005622 GO:0009190 GO:0009785 GO:0009882 GO:0016849 GO:0035556 GO:0071949
30.180.2983.190.230.334p2fA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004016 GO:0005524 GO:0005622 GO:0005886 GO:0006171 GO:0007165 GO:0009190 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016829 GO:0016849 GO:0030145 GO:0035556 GO:0046872
40.170.3082.340.260.333r5gB GO:0004016 GO:0005622 GO:0005886 GO:0006171 GO:0007165 GO:0009190 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016849 GO:0035556
50.170.3092.630.290.342w01A GO:0004016 GO:0005622 GO:0005886 GO:0006171 GO:0007165 GO:0009190 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016849 GO:0035556
60.140.3022.500.230.333et6A GO:0000166 GO:0004016 GO:0004383 GO:0005886 GO:0006182 GO:0007165 GO:0008074 GO:0009190 GO:0016829 GO:0016849 GO:0020037 GO:0035556
70.140.2992.960.200.331azsA GO:0000166 GO:0004016 GO:0005524 GO:0005622 GO:0005886 GO:0005929 GO:0006171 GO:0007189 GO:0007193 GO:0007204 GO:0009190 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016829 GO:0016849 GO:0019933 GO:0035556 GO:0042995 GO:0046872 GO:0061178 GO:0072372 GO:1904322
80.120.3092.380.200.334ni2B GO:0000166 GO:0004016 GO:0004383 GO:0004872 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0006182 GO:0007263 GO:0008015 GO:0008074 GO:0009190 GO:0016829 GO:0016849 GO:0020037 GO:0035556 GO:0038060 GO:0043231 GO:0046872 GO:0071732
90.110.2792.630.220.303mr7A GO:0005622 GO:0009190 GO:0016787 GO:0016849 GO:0035556
100.060.3686.850.060.554w8yA GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0005737 GO:0046872 GO:0051607
110.060.3346.910.070.503w2wA GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0005737 GO:0046872 GO:0051607
120.060.3396.640.090.493x1lA GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0005737 GO:0046872 GO:0051607
130.060.3596.720.090.534dozA GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0005737 GO:0046872 GO:0051607
140.060.2916.590.050.431e3dB GO:0008901 GO:0016151 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
150.060.2733.530.240.314wp3C GO:0004016 GO:0005622 GO:0006171 GO:0009190 GO:0016829 GO:0016849 GO:0035556
160.060.2456.680.060.363wfoB GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0005524 GO:0006396 GO:0016740 GO:0016779
170.060.2087.460.060.344hh0A GO:0000166 GO:0009785 GO:0009882 GO:0071949
180.060.2206.910.040.344lv8A GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0005524 GO:0006468


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004016 GO:0019899 GO:0043168 GO:0050660 GO:0009881 GO:0000287 GO:0005524 GO:0030145 GO:0000155
GO-Score 0.66 0.54 0.54 0.45 0.45 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.31
Biological Processes GO:0006171 GO:0043068 GO:0003341 GO:0048232 GO:0070887 GO:0042981 GO:0010035 GO:0071483 GO:0030522 GO:0018298 GO:0000160 GO:0023014
GO-Score 0.66 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.45 0.45 0.31 0.31 0.31
Cellular Component GO:0036477 GO:0044463 GO:0044444 GO:0043231 GO:0044297 GO:0043232 GO:0005929 GO:0043005 GO:0030427 GO:0005886 GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.51 0.33

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.