[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3639c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.07 4 2xquC CVM Rep, Mult 69,72
20.06 3 4m0kC CA Rep, Mult 130,134
30.04 2 1ey3A DAK Rep, Mult 134,137
40.04 2 1l7xB 700 Rep, Mult 45,47,74,78
50.04 2 1um0A FMN Rep, Mult 147,148
60.04 2 3luhB 5GP Rep, Mult 138,142
70.02 1 5c2xB CO3 Rep, Mult 77,140
80.02 1 1xi2A CB1 Rep, Mult 99,145
90.02 1 1pn3A III Rep, Mult 8,9,12,72,103,104,134,137,156
100.02 1 1z62A IAA Rep, Mult 10,13,21,33,34
110.02 1 3ih1A PYR Rep, Mult 153,154
120.02 1 2atiA IHU Rep, Mult 24,25,26
130.02 1 2xquB CVM Rep, Mult 65,69
140.02 1 3pyoI MG Rep, Mult 140,143,144
150.02 1 1k77A MG Rep, Mult 176,177
160.02 1 4a8mR ATP Rep, Mult 123,125,149
170.02 1 3bd7A CKB Rep, Mult 55,59,60,63
180.02 1 4nhpA 2T8 Rep, Mult 132,136

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601gqtB0.4994.660.0840.7872.7.1.15NA
20.0601cjyA0.5015.290.0430.8563.1.1.4,3.1.1.5NA
30.0603beoA0.5224.480.0940.7875.1.3.14NA
40.0603f67A0.4984.830.0570.7933.1.1.-NA
50.0602oz5A0.5014.530.0730.7553.1.3.4851,73,108,129
60.0603dzcA0.5174.360.0740.7615.1.3.14NA
70.0601sb8A0.5034.960.0690.7875.1.3.7NA
80.0601rzuB0.5774.640.0580.8832.4.1.21NA
90.0602bfpD0.4994.220.0700.7341.5.1.33NA
100.0601f2dA0.5154.560.0250.7773.5.99.7NA
110.0602azdB0.5654.760.0400.9042.4.1.197
120.0601f0kB0.4904.670.0620.7662.4.1.2274,89
130.0601e1yA0.5774.780.0620.9252.4.1.1NA
140.0601j33A0.4984.920.0940.7982.4.2.21NA
150.0602a9yA0.5024.540.0570.7612.7.1.20NA
160.0601ygpA0.5674.800.0960.9102.4.1.186
170.0601gz5A0.5484.380.0650.8512.4.1.15NA
180.0602fv7A0.5034.290.1090.7662.7.1.15NA
190.0602r4uA0.5654.550.1100.8722.4.1.21110

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.090.6263.610.150.852p6pA GO:0016740
10.090.6253.930.100.882yjnA GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016758 GO:0017000
20.080.6173.960.110.891rrvA GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016758 GO:0017000 GO:0030259 GO:0033072
30.080.6523.230.130.843uykA GO:0016740
40.080.6183.570.170.844rieA GO:0016740
50.080.6274.170.100.913othA GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016758 GO:0030259
60.080.6233.420.110.824g2tA GO:0008152 GO:0016758
70.070.5823.690.070.813d0rB GO:0046527
80.070.6093.510.130.834rifB GO:0016740
90.070.6134.310.070.933rscA GO:0008152 GO:0016758 GO:0016999
100.070.6013.580.120.814ambB GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016758 GO:0042802
110.070.5824.140.110.841iirA GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016758 GO:0017000 GO:0030259 GO:0033072
120.070.5993.970.100.853wadB GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016758
130.070.5883.880.070.852iyaA GO:0000166 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016758 GO:0016999
140.070.5804.320.120.884m7pA GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016758 GO:0016999 GO:0046677
150.070.5463.890.120.784an4D GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016758 GO:0042802
160.070.5704.030.110.814leiA GO:0016740 GO:0016757
170.070.5394.110.110.794an4C GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016758 GO:0042802
180.060.3174.950.050.514pdeA GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006777 GO:0006810 GO:0016783 GO:0043546 GO:0097163


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016740
GO-Score 0.35
Biological Processes GO:0044249 GO:0016999
GO-Score 0.32 0.32
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.