I-TASSER results

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3633

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Input Sequence in FASTA format

>protein (291 residues)
MTQSSSVERLVGEIDEFGYTVVEDVLDADSVAAYLADTRRLERELPTVIANSTTVVKGLA
RPGHVPVDRVDHDWVRIDNLLLHGTRYEALPVHPKLLPVIEGVLGRDCLLSWCMTSNQLP
GAVAQRLHCDDEMYPLPRPHQPLLCNALIALCDFTADNGATQVVPGSHRWPERPSPPYPE
GKPVEINAGDALIWNGSLWHTAAANRTDAPRPALTINFCVGFVRQQVNQQLSIPRELVRC
FEPRLQELIGYGLYAGKMGRIDWRPPADYLDADRHPFLDAVADRLQTSVRL

Predicted Secondary Structure

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MTQSSSVERLVGEIDEFGYTVVEDVLDADSVAAYLADTRRLERELPTVIANSTTVVKGLARPGHVPVDRVDHDWVRIDNLLLHGTRYEALPVHPKLLPVIEGVLGRDCLLSWCMTSNQLPGAVAQRLHCDDEMYPLPRPHQPLLCNALIALCDFTADNGATQVVPGSHRWPERPSPPYPEGKPVEINAGDALIWNGSLWHTAAANRTDAPRPALTINFCVGFVRQQVNQQLSIPRELVRCFEPRLQELIGYGLYAGKMGRIDWRPPADYLDADRHPFLDAVADRLQTSVRL
Prediction	CCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCEEEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEHCCCCCEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCC
Conf.Score	999887999999998858899689999999999999999999986545666555556666666666666776444577788859899999987799999999979987999765566589999878877777555789998658999999556898888779868866899888988787577557998799995996556789999998689999997676687656666799999987999999998887889876546888988876677765467899986456789
	H:Helix; S:Strand; C:Coil

Predicted Solvent Accessibility

Sequence	20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| MTQSSSVERLVGEIDEFGYTVVEDVLDADSVAAYLADTRRLERELPTVIANSTTVVKGLARPGHVPVDRVDHDWVRIDNLLLHGTRYEALPVHPKLLPVIEGVLGRDCLLSWCMTSNQLPGAVAQRLHCDDEMYPLPRPHQPLLCNALIALCDFTADNGATQVVPGSHRWPERPSPPYPEGKPVEINAGDALIWNGSLWHTAAANRTDAPRPALTINFCVGFVRQQVNQQLSIPRELVRCFEPRLQELIGYGLYAGKMGRIDWRPPADYLDADRHPFLDAVADRLQTSVRL
Prediction	745544154015205622100044003662054026104501652454345444335434444434444344312101200422400230042220130032013430101111302021546523021212002144433010000001013135514102112101314544456255123230520000000020000022133733000000010222032432231313341055026301410213244100010142302420636443315303541474665
	Values range from 0 (buried residue) to 8 (highly exposed residue)

Predicted Normalized B-facotr

(B-factor is a value to indicate the extent of the inherent thermal mobility of residues/atoms in proteins. In I-TASSER, this value is deduced from threading template proteins from the PDB in combination with the sequence profiles derived from sequence databases. The reported B-factor profile in the figure below corresponds to the normalized B-factor of the target protein, defined by B=(B'-u)/s, where B' is the raw B-factor value, u and s are respectively the mean and standard deviation of the raw B-factors along the sequence. (Click here to read more about predicted normalized B-factor)

Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER

Rank

PDB
Hit

Iden1

Iden2

Cov

Norm.
Zscore

Download
Align.

                  20                  40                  60                  80                 100                 120                 140                 160                 180                 200                 220                 240                 260                 280

                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |                   |

Sec.Str
Seq

CCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHCCEEEHCCCCCHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHCHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHCHHHHHHHHHHHCCCEEEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEHCCCCCEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCEEEEEEEEHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHHCCHHHHHHHCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCHHHHHCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHCCCCCC
MTQSSSVERLVGEIDEFGYTVVEDVLDADSVAAYLADTRRLERELPTVIANSTTVVKGLARPGHVPVDRVDHDWVRIDNLLLHGTRYEALPVHPKLLPVIEGVLGRDCLLSWCMTSNQLPGAVAQRLHCDDEMYPLPRPHQPLLCNALIALCDFTADNGATQVVPGSHRWPERPSPPYPEGKPVEINAGDALIWNGSLWHTAAANRTDAPRPALTINFCVGFVRQQVNQQLSIPRELVRCFEPRLQELIGYGLYAGKMGRIDWRPPADYLDADRHPFLDAVADRLQTSVRL

5dapA

0.22

0.20

0.94

2.57

MUSTER

LSAINDLHKIWPTVEEHGAAIIESFLSLDIVRRLNEEVDPFVKIEP----------IPAAKTKDHPNHVLSTTTRLVNVLAPISKAYREDVNSKVLHRICSDAFHVDYWVLMGAVMELAPSNPAQPLHRDMRFSHLKPDAPATSINFLVALSPFTAENGATHVILGSHKWQNLSNVSMDATVRALMNPGDALLITDSTIHCGGAETTTETRRLLTITMGISQLTPLESN-LAVPRPVIESLTPLAQRLLGWASQRSAAPRDIGLL-----TIRGNSIEKTMN--LKAEQPL

4naoA

0.22

0.20

0.92

3.72

dPPAS

FSIQSDPVEIHRAIVEDGVAIIEGFLTPEQVQKLNKDVDAPLKADREQ---------------FWLADFIPDHVARVHNLVDFSHCFRHEILNHELLHKICRLTFGDYWLGYGAVIENGPGTTEQKWHRDQPRYPLVKEGPEGMLNFFTALTDFDAETGKTQYILGSNKRVELGEPDADHPEYVGLKPGDTTIVSGKITHRGSDNRSDKMRRAMPIMIIPSILTPFD-ATCHLSRELVETMTPLAQKMICRRSAKTGIWCVNMREAGEQIGLKSNQRAKEDAE--------

4naoA

0.22

0.20

0.92

4.68

wdPPAS

FSIQSDPVEIHRAIVEDGVAIIEGFLTPEQVQKLNKDVDAPLKADRE---------------QFWLADFIPDHVARVHNLVDFSHCFRHEILNHELLHKICRLTFGDYWLGYGAVIENGPGTTEQKWHRDQPRYPLVPDAPEGMLNFFTALTDFDAETGKTQYILGSNKRVELGEPDADHPEYVGLKPGDTTIVSGKITHRGSDNRSDKMRRAMPIMIIPSILTPFDA-TCHLSRELVETMTPLAQKMICRRSAKTGIWCVNMREAGEQIGLKSNQRAKEDAE--------

5dapA

0.22

0.21

0.94

3.35

wMUSTER

LSAINDLHKIWPTVEEHGAAIIESFLSLDIVRRLNEEVDPFVKIEP----------IPAAKTKDHPNHVLSTTTRLVNVLAPISKAYREDVNSKVLHRICSDAFHVDYWVLMGAVMELAPSNPAQPLHRDMRFSHLKPDAPATSINFLVALSPFTAENGATHVILGSHKWQNLSNVSMDATVRALMNPGDALLITDSTIHCGGAETTTETRRLLTITMGISQLTPLESN-LAVPRPVIESLTPLAQRLLGWASQRSAAPRDIG------LLTIRGNSIEKTMN-LKAEQPL

4naoA

0.22

0.20

0.92

4.83

wPPAS

FSIQSDPVEIHRAIVEDGVAIIEGFLTPEQVQKLNKDVDAPLKADRE---------------QFWLADFIPDHVARVHNLVDFSHCFRHEILNHELLHKICRLTFGDYWLGYGAVIENGPGTTEQKWHRDQPRYPLVKEGPEGMLNFFTALTDFDAETGKTQYILGSNKRVELGEPDADPIEYVGLKPGDTTIVSGKITHRGSDNRSDKMRRAMPIMIIPSILTPFDA-TCHLSRELVETMTPLAQKMICRRSAKTGIWCVNMREAGEQIGLKSNQRAKEDAE--------

4naoA

0.22

0.20

0.92

6.68

dPPAS2

FSIQSDPVEIHRAIVEDGVAIIEGFLTPEQVQKLNKDVDAPLKADREQ---------------FWLADFIPDHVARVHNLVDFSHCFRHEILNHELLHKICRLTFGDYWLGYGAVIENGPGTTEQKWHRDQPRYPLVKEGPEGMLNFFTALTDFDAETGKTQYILGSNKRVELGEPDADHPEYVGLKPGDTTIVSGKITHRGSDNRSDKMRRAMPIMIIPSILTPFD-ATCHLSRELVETMTPLAQKMICRRSAKTGIWCVNMREAGEQIGLKSNQRAKEDAE--------

4naoA

0.22

0.20

0.92

4.21

PPAS

FSIQSDPVEIHRAIVEDGVAIIEGFLTPEQVQKLNKDVDAPLKADRE---------------QFWLADFIPDHVARVHNLVDFSHCFRHEILNHELLHKICRLTFGDYWLGYGAVIENGPGTTEQKWHRDQPRYPLVKEGPEGMLNFFTALTDFDAETGKTQYILGSNKRVELGEPDADHPEYVGLKPGDTTIVSGKITHRGSDNRSDKMRRAMPIMIIPSILTPFDA-TCHLSRELVETMTPLAQKMICRRSAKTGIWCVNMREAGEQIGLKSNQRAKEDAE--------

4naoA

0.22

0.20

0.92

4.80

Env-PPAS

FSIQSDPVEIHRAIVEDGVAIIEGFLTPEQVQKLNKDVDAPLKADREQ---------------FWLADFIPDHVARVHNLVDFSHCFRHEILNHELLHKICRLTFGDYWLGYGAVIENGPGTTEQKWHRDQPRYPEGPDAPEGMLNFFTALTDFDAETGKTQYILGSNKRVELGEPDADPIEYVGLKPGDTTIVSGKITHRGSDNRSDKMRRAMPIMIIPSILTPFDA-TCHLSRELVETMTPLAQKMICRRSVKTGIWCVNMREAGEQIGLKSNQRAKEDAE--------

4y5sA

0.22

0.21

0.93

2.55

MUSTER

LAADADVDRMCRLLEEDGAFILKGLLPFDVVESFNRELDVQMAI-------------PPPKGERLLADKYPPHFKYVPNVATTCPTFRNTVINPVIHAICEAYFQRDYWLSAAFLREIESGMPAQPFHRDDATHPQPLEAPPVSLSVIFPLTEFTEENGATEVILGSHRWTEVGTPERDQAVLATMDPGDVLIVRQRVVHAGGGNRTGKPRRVVLAYFNSVQLTPFET-YRTMPREMVESMTVLGQRMLGWRTMKPSDPNIVGINLI-----DDKRLENVLQLKAADSPAL

4y5sA

0.22

0.21

0.93

3.65

dPPAS

LAADADVDRMCRLLEEDGAFILKGLLPFDVVESFNRELDVQMAI-------------PPPKGERLLADKYPPHFKYVPNVATTCPTFRNTVINPVIHAICEAYFQRDYWLSAAFLREIESGMPAQPFHRDDATHPQPLEAPPVSLSVIFPLTEFTEENGATEVILGSHRWTEVGTPERDQAVLATMDPGDVLIVRQRVVHAGGGNRTGKPRRVVLAYFNSVQLTPFET-YRTMPREMVESMTVLGQRMLGWRTMKPSDPNIVGINLI-----DDKRLENVLQLKAADSPAL

(a)	Iden1 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by number of aligned residues.
(b)	Iden2 is the number of template residues identical to query divided by query sequence length.
(c)	Cov is equal the number of aligned template residues divided by query sequence length.
(d)	Norm. Zscore is the normalized Z-score of the threading alignments. A Normalized Z-score >1 means a good alignment.
(e)	Download Align. list the threading program used to identify the template provide the 3D structure of aligned regions of threading templates.

Top 3 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)

More about C-score

Local structure accuracy of first model

Download Model 1

C-score=0.18

Estimated TM-score = 0.74±0.11

Estimated RMSD = 5.7±3.6Å

Download Model 2

C-score=-0.20

Download Model 3

C-score=0.21

Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)

Top 10 Identified stuctural analogs in PDB

Rank	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov
1	4naoA	0.883	1.37	0.213	0.917
2	5dapA	0.856	1.89	0.217	0.917
3	4y5sA	0.833	2.33	0.218	0.914
4	4xbzA	0.679	4.05	0.170	0.842
5	2csgA	0.658	3.82	0.091	0.828
6	4rgkA	0.649	3.93	0.116	0.818
7	2opwA	0.644	3.65	0.168	0.787
8	2fcuA	0.641	4.25	0.137	0.825
9	5ep9A	0.631	3.52	0.232	0.753
10	5epaA	0.628	3.44	0.177	0.749

(a)	Query structure is shown in cartoon, while the structural analog is displayed using backbone trace.
(b)	Ranking of proteins is based on TM-score of the structural alignment between the query structure and known structures in the PDB library.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of the alignment by TM-align and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)

Ligand binding sites

Rank	C-score	Cluster size	PDB Hit	Lig Name	Download Complex	Ligand Binding Site Residues
1	0.41	38	5equD	AKG	Rep, Mult	74,116,118,125,128,130,148,161,200,202,211,215
2	0.25	25	3kv6D	FE2	Rep, Mult	128,130,200
3	0.02	3	1uogA	P1C	Rep, Mult	114,128,130,146,148,161,194,200,202,215,217
4	0.01	1	3ouiA	42Z	Rep, Mult	11,15,97,100,103,109,194

	Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
	Download the templates clustering results.
(a)	C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)	Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)	Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)	Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column. Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

Rank	Cscore^EC	PDB Hit	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	EC Number	Active Site Residues
1	0.091	2a1xA	0.604	3.37	0.163	0.718	1.14.11.18	NA
2	0.060	2ztgA	0.386	6.05	0.028	0.656	6.1.1.7	NA
3	0.060	3f93A	0.374	6.76	0.044	0.677	3.2.1.-	247
4	0.060	3hmjA	0.386	6.77	0.069	0.698	2.3.1.86	NA
5	0.060	3hhsB	0.365	6.41	0.051	0.632	1.14.18.1	NA
6	0.060	1ygbA	0.388	5.98	0.020	0.646	6.1.1.7	84
7	0.060	1p8fA	0.365	6.51	0.035	0.646	1.1.1.42	254
8	0.060	1bk0A	0.526	3.80	0.113	0.656	1.21.3.1	NA
9	0.060	1gp6A	0.535	3.47	0.088	0.653	1.14.11.19	NA
10	0.060	2pqdA	0.366	5.78	0.043	0.567	2.5.1.19	NA
11	0.060	2ilmA	0.507	3.71	0.078	0.625	1.14.11.16	128
12	0.060	2de0X	0.394	6.16	0.047	0.646	2.4.1.68	100
13	0.060	3h09B	0.378	6.73	0.060	0.684	3.4.21.72	NA
14	0.060	1n1hA	0.385	6.47	0.052	0.673	2.7.7.48	111
15	0.060	3kv4A	0.507	4.93	0.082	0.698	1.14.11.27	NA
16	0.060	1unbA	0.519	4.12	0.065	0.673	1.14.20.1	NA
17	0.060	1t3tA	0.402	6.62	0.044	0.725	6.3.5.3	NA
18	0.060	1e5rB	0.426	3.16	0.090	0.502	1.14.11.28	NA
19	0.060	3dmsA	0.358	6.51	0.024	0.636	1.1.1.42	254
20	0.060	2zzgA	0.381	6.29	0.048	0.649	6.1.1.7	123

(a)	Cscore^EC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. Cscore^EC values range in between [0-1]; where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.

Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Rank	Cscore^GO	TM-score	RMSD^a	IDEN^a	Cov	PDB Hit	Associated GO Terms
Homologous GO templates in PDB
0	0.37	0.883	1.37	0.21	0.92	4naoA	GO:0046872
1	0.36	0.856	1.89	0.22	0.92	5dapA	GO:0051213 GO:0055114
2	0.34	0.833	2.33	0.22	0.91	4y5sA	GO:0016491 GO:0051213 GO:0055114 GO:1902181
3	0.29	0.619	3.73	0.18	0.75	4q5oA	GO:0016706 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
4	0.28	0.644	3.68	0.17	0.79	3obzA	GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
5	0.28	0.604	3.37	0.16	0.72	2a1xA	GO:0001561 GO:0003824 GO:0005739 GO:0005777 GO:0005782 GO:0006631 GO:0006720 GO:0016491 GO:0031418 GO:0046872 GO:0048037 GO:0048244 GO:0051213 GO:0055114 GO:0097089
6	0.18	0.615	3.56	0.14	0.74	4nmiA	GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016706 GO:0019491 GO:0042400 GO:0046872 GO:0051213 GO:0055114
7	0.06	0.328	6.52	0.06	0.57	4n5fA	GO:0003995 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016627 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
8	0.06	0.291	6.45	0.04	0.51	3hlfA	GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016787 GO:0017000 GO:0030639 GO:0050832
9	0.06	0.297	7.08	0.07	0.56	3vehB	GO:0000287 GO:0004106 GO:0008909 GO:0009058 GO:0009697 GO:0016829 GO:0016833 GO:0016853 GO:0019540 GO:0043904 GO:0046872
10	0.06	0.279	6.15	0.04	0.45	3qvfA	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
11	0.06	0.292	6.20	0.06	0.49	4bkqA	GO:0004318 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016491 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
12	0.06	0.278	6.95	0.03	0.52	3ip4B	GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0006412 GO:0016874 GO:0016884 GO:0050567
13	0.06	0.275	6.25	0.04	0.48	2f17A	GO:0000166 GO:0004788 GO:0005524 GO:0006772 GO:0009229 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0030975
14	0.06	0.283	6.66	0.06	0.50	3txxB	GO:0005737 GO:0006520 GO:0006596 GO:0016597 GO:0016740 GO:0016743 GO:0033388 GO:0033390 GO:0050231
15	0.06	0.290	6.55	0.04	0.52	3wnbA	GO:0003746 GO:0006414
16	0.06	0.269	6.77	0.03	0.49	3im9A	GO:0003824 GO:0004314 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
17	0.06	0.241	6.76	0.02	0.44	4hacA	GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004496 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006629 GO:0008152 GO:0008299 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019287
18	0.06	0.300	6.49	0.05	0.52	4c20B	GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0005996 GO:0006004 GO:0008736 GO:0016853 GO:0016861 GO:0019317 GO:0030145 GO:0042355 GO:0046872
19	0.06	0.307	5.58	0.02	0.46	4qqaA	GO:0009405 GO:0015485
20	0.06	0.296	6.47	0.06	0.50	3bjxA	GO:0019120

Consensus prediction of GO terms

Molecular Function	GO:0051213	GO:0046872	GO:0016705
GO-Score	0.70	0.68	0.58
Biological Processes	GO:0055114	GO:1902181
GO-Score	0.78	0.34
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)	Cscore^GO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)	TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)	RMSD^a is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)	IDEN^a is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)	Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)	The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on Cscore^GO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1.	J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2.	J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.	A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.	Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.