[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3605c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 3 4ryrA MPG Rep, Mult 41,44,45,130,131,134,137
20.07 3 1biqB UUU Rep, Mult 45,49,52,107,125,128
30.05 2 4ryqA MPG Rep, Mult 130,131,134,137
40.05 2 3locA URA Rep, Mult 137,140
50.03 1 4ryrA DMS Rep, Mult 38,42,85,131,135
60.02 1 4amjB 2CV Rep, Mult 1,5
70.02 1 1ijdD BCL Rep, Mult 96,99
80.02 1 1xmeC HAS Rep, Mult 77,81
90.02 1 2wse1 CLA Rep, Mult 84,91
100.02 1 1g42A CA Rep, Mult 74,77
110.02 1 2y00A 2CV Rep, Mult 53,56,75,82
120.02 1 4rynA MPG Rep, Mult 44,51,55,59,118
130.02 1 1kf6O CE1 Rep, Mult 42,43,46
140.02 1 1rsrB UUU Rep, Mult 42,100,103,132,135

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0662htnG0.5603.880.0720.7721.16.3.1NA
20.0601h2aL0.5844.190.0900.8731.12.2.1NA
30.0602ix6A0.5544.870.0730.8921.3.3.6NA
40.0601rsrB0.5783.970.0580.8291.17.4.1130,136
50.0602wpnB0.5754.030.0590.8351.12.7.240
60.0601cc1L0.5644.330.0630.8671.12.99.6NA
70.0601ivhA0.5474.760.0490.8671.3.99.10129
80.0601o9iA0.5804.230.0710.8541.11.1.640,43
90.0602j2fA0.5613.870.0470.7721.14.19.2,1.14.99.6NA
100.0602rccA0.5414.350.0260.7971.17.4.1NA
110.0601smsA0.5813.780.0590.7911.17.4.1NA
120.0601uzrB0.5733.970.0710.8291.17.4.1NA
130.0602pfdB0.5354.300.0590.8042.1.2.5,4.3.1.4132
140.0601h2rL0.5864.160.0900.8731.12.2.146,51
150.0602frvD0.5674.140.0920.8611.12.2.1NA
160.0601jkuA0.5784.330.0650.8611.11.1.6NA
170.0601u8vA0.5554.350.0700.8175.3.3.3NA
180.0602pnrB0.5274.250.0460.7782.7.11.2NA
190.0601fziA0.5824.000.0760.8291.14.13.25NA
200.0601xvgC0.5704.350.1200.8481.14.13.2546,51

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.280.7412.720.070.904rymA GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0033013 GO:0046906
10.260.7382.440.100.885duoA GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0008289 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0033013 GO:0046906
20.220.6803.490.100.952jswA GO:0001726 GO:0003779 GO:0005178 GO:0005200 GO:0005737 GO:0005815 GO:0005856 GO:0005886 GO:0005925 GO:0007016 GO:0007044 GO:0007155 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0017166 GO:0030054 GO:0030274 GO:0030866 GO:0032403 GO:0032587 GO:0042995 GO:0051015 GO:0070062 GO:0070527
30.180.6533.650.100.931r0dA GO:0003779 GO:0005543 GO:0005737 GO:0005856 GO:0005905 GO:0006897 GO:0006898 GO:0006915 GO:0012505 GO:0016020 GO:0030136 GO:0030276 GO:0030665 GO:0031410 GO:0035091 GO:0043231 GO:0048471 GO:0072583
40.160.6393.790.100.923ay5A GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0007049 GO:0051726
50.150.6133.270.090.842zw3A GO:0005243 GO:0005737 GO:0005793 GO:0005886 GO:0005921 GO:0005922 GO:0006810 GO:0007154 GO:0007267 GO:0007565 GO:0007605 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016264 GO:0016328 GO:0030054 GO:0030539 GO:0032355 GO:0032570 GO:0034599 GO:0044752 GO:0046697 GO:0055085
60.150.6623.690.100.972mgyA GO:0005497 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005741 GO:0006694 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006821 GO:0006869 GO:0007268 GO:0007568 GO:0008347 GO:0008503 GO:0010042 GO:0010266 GO:0010823 GO:0010940 GO:0014012 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030325 GO:0031397 GO:0031965 GO:0031966 GO:0032570 GO:0032720 GO:0033574 GO:0042493 GO:0043065 GO:0043231 GO:0044325 GO:0045019 GO:0048265 GO:0048266 GO:0048678 GO:0050810 GO:0051901 GO:0051928 GO:0060242 GO:0060252 GO:0060253 GO:0070062 GO:0071222 GO:0071294 GO:0071476 GO:0072655 GO:0072656 GO:0098794 GO:0099565 GO:1903147 GO:1903579 GO:2000379
70.080.5903.590.040.791h0nA GO:0004748 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009262 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0051259 GO:0051290 GO:0055114
80.070.5933.740.030.814c3oA GO:0008901 GO:0016151 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
90.070.5504.120.050.821e3dB GO:0008901 GO:0016151 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
100.070.5343.930.040.784iubL GO:0005886 GO:0008901 GO:0016020 GO:0016151 GO:0016491 GO:0033748 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
110.070.6043.930.040.844ac8A GO:0004748 GO:0005506 GO:0005829 GO:0005971 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
120.070.6024.040.050.873myrD GO:0008901 GO:0016151 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
130.070.5753.720.070.804ci0A GO:0008901 GO:0016151 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0050454 GO:0050660 GO:0051536 GO:0055114
140.070.5933.720.070.815a4mL GO:0005886 GO:0006113 GO:0008901 GO:0009055 GO:0009061 GO:0016020 GO:0016151 GO:0016491 GO:0030288 GO:0033748 GO:0044569 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
150.070.5923.690.030.803ayxA GO:0008901 GO:0016151 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
160.070.6033.830.040.855dcsA GO:0004748 GO:0009186 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
170.070.5744.410.050.862wpnB GO:0008901 GO:0016151 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051539 GO:0055114
180.070.5914.250.080.885aa5C GO:0016151


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0046906 GO:0050839 GO:0005198 GO:0005102 GO:0032403 GO:0019904 GO:0003779
GO-Score 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0033013 GO:0032507 GO:0030168 GO:0034329 GO:0030036 GO:0030865 GO:0034109 GO:0006897 GO:0012501 GO:0050794 GO:0007049
GO-Score 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.36 0.36 0.31 0.31
Cellular Component GO:0016021 GO:0031256 GO:0005924 GO:0015630 GO:0031253 GO:1903561 GO:0044430 GO:0030662 GO:0098589 GO:0031981
GO-Score 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.36 0.36 0.31

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.