[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3572

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 5 2y58A V38 Rep, Mult 37,44,85,150,152
20.08 4 2a7aA CA Rep, Mult 116,118,125
30.04 2 1gqgA UUU Rep, Mult 162,163
40.04 2 3q2wA MAN Rep, Mult 33,43
50.04 2 2fynC SMA Rep, Mult 152,154
60.04 2 3d48R CO3 Rep, Mult 83,84,85,150,152
70.02 1 3oqqA CA Rep, Mult 84,112,115
80.02 1 1agmA MAN Rep, Mult 166,167
90.02 1 1aczA GLC Rep, Mult 78,138
100.02 1 5fy1A 0R0 Rep, Mult 42,154
110.02 1 1j2qH CIB Rep, Mult 49,151
120.02 1 4f24A MG Rep, Mult 37,38,40,41,157
130.02 1 1ohtA ZN Rep, Mult 45,154,170
140.02 1 3mflB DHY Rep, Mult 74,93
150.02 1 1vtzi CA Rep, Mult 140,141

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602agsA0.4265.020.0460.7223.2.1.18NA
20.0603ovwA0.4415.180.0520.7843.2.1.4NA
30.0601lfwA0.4145.700.0440.7733.4.13.3NA
40.0602frvD0.4475.090.0520.7671.12.2.1NA
50.0601g87B0.4423.650.0230.6143.2.1.4NA
60.0601ui7A0.4144.720.0870.6651.4.3.21136
70.0601a39A0.4385.420.0560.8183.2.1.4NA
80.0601pz2A0.4214.280.0830.6363.2.1.55NA
90.0601av4A0.4164.820.0620.6821.4.3.21,1.4.3.6NA
100.0602a1xA0.4184.470.0900.6531.14.11.18NA
110.0601mdwA0.2655.970.0540.4943.4.22.53NA
120.0601nlrA0.4514.900.0590.7503.2.1.443
130.0601sdwA0.4614.510.0290.7334.3.2.5,1.14.17.3NA
140.0601olrA0.4244.960.0370.7223.2.1.443
150.0602zxqA0.4194.820.0460.7053.2.1.9733,112
160.0601s0kA0.4205.040.0620.7103.2.1.18NA
170.0602nqaB0.2695.260.0540.4723.4.22.53,3.4.22.52138
180.0601ddtA0.4614.240.0460.6882.4.2.36NA
190.0601sg3A0.4314.520.0700.6933.5.3.4NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.090.6523.320.110.844mboA GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0009986 GO:0030260 GO:1990254
10.080.5363.110.100.674rmbB GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0009986 GO:0030260 GO:1990254
20.070.6113.600.070.824mbrA GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155
30.070.5844.170.100.821n67A GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0009405 GO:0016020
40.070.5814.050.080.842ralA GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0046872
50.070.5804.050.070.841r17A GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0009405 GO:0016020 GO:0046872
60.070.5983.880.050.843au0A GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0009405 GO:0016020
70.070.5824.070.050.844b5zA GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0009405 GO:0016020
80.070.5724.130.070.824jdzB GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0016020 GO:0016021
90.060.5533.870.070.773irpX GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0009405 GO:0016020
100.060.3085.840.050.593c0kA GO:0003723 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006364 GO:0008168 GO:0008649 GO:0009383 GO:0016434 GO:0016740 GO:0031167 GO:0032259 GO:0044010 GO:0070475
110.060.4413.760.060.622xbtA GO:0000272 GO:0005975 GO:0030246 GO:0030248
120.060.3295.940.070.644ljyA GO:0000166 GO:0000348 GO:0003676 GO:0004004 GO:0004386 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0006397 GO:0008186 GO:0008380 GO:0010468 GO:0010501 GO:0016787
130.060.5824.100.100.835cfaB GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0007155 GO:0009405 GO:0016020
140.060.3094.080.040.442fqpC GO:0046872
150.060.3045.540.030.563hyiA GO:0003677 GO:0004519 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0043937 GO:0090305
160.060.2865.830.050.534o0lA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
170.060.3006.020.060.563s6tA GO:0004553 GO:0004563 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
180.060.2825.620.040.524chcA GO:0001172 GO:0003723 GO:0003968 GO:0006351


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0019215
GO-Score 0.33
Biological Processes GO:0051806 GO:0044409 GO:0007155
GO-Score 0.33 0.33 0.32
Cellular Component GO:0005618 GO:0005576
GO-Score 0.32 0.32

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.