[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3533c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 4 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.06 3 4hxbL CA Rep, Mult 344,345,441,442
20.06 3 3cmvG ANP Rep, Mult 232,234,235,236,237,280
30.04 2 2qubE CA Rep, Mult 457,459,461,474,477,478,482
40.04 2 1jwlA NUC Rep, Mult 26,30
50.04 2 2quaA CA Rep, Mult 474,477,478,479,482,497,502,503,506
60.02 1 3cmvE ANP Rep, Mult 194,195,221,222,247,250
70.02 1 2nzmA CA Rep, Mult 372,379
80.02 1 3i9gL MG Rep, Mult 342,442
90.02 1 5hpmC CY3 Rep, Mult 227,322
100.02 1 4xcnF UNL Rep, Mult 339,435,437
110.02 1 3hdbA CA Rep, Mult 34,35
120.02 1 2z8xA CA Rep, Mult 474,477,478,479,482,498
130.02 1 2z8xA CA Rep, Mult 491,503,505,506
140.02 1 2qkiD III Rep, Mult 239,240,241,242,247,268,292
150.02 1 1af0A CA Rep, Mult 407,408,409,412,418,419,420
160.02 1 1jz6A MG Rep, Mult 370,373,375
170.02 1 2g38B MN Rep, Mult 149,152,153
180.02 1 1srpA CA Rep, Mult 397,399,402,414,419,420
190.02 1 5k6wB FUC Rep, Mult 342,437,438,439
200.02 1 1hn1C NA Rep, Mult 425,428,429,431

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602e9bA0.3087.880.0530.5073.2.1.41NA
20.0603ffzA0.3337.290.0380.5173.4.24.69NA
30.0602vz8A0.3188.500.0490.5602.3.1.85540
40.0602je8B0.2876.720.0480.4143.2.1.25141
50.0602vkzG0.3238.190.0330.5432.3.1.38,3.1.2.14449,466
60.0601mc0A0.2167.030.0330.3303.1.4.17222
70.0602z8yP0.2428.260.0480.4112.3.1.169NA
80.0602uv8G0.3268.310.0310.5552.3.1.86NA
90.0602fhbA0.2988.080.0340.4983.2.1.41NA
100.0603lxuX0.3197.010.0370.4793.4.14.10254,256,258,261
110.0601z0hB0.2087.030.0270.3113.4.24.69302
120.0602vz8B0.2878.180.0620.4862.3.1.85540
130.0603fn9C0.2886.850.0350.4213.2.1.23NA
140.0602pffB0.3027.620.1500.4912.3.1.86449,454,464,502
150.0603ecqB0.3208.080.0530.5393.2.1.97NA
160.0601kv3A0.2817.980.0370.4622.3.2.13NA
170.0602q3zA0.2907.680.0430.4672.3.2.13NA
180.0602vuaA0.2126.690.0290.3083.4.24.69465
190.0601ojnA0.2468.560.0590.4424.2.2.1NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.200.8523.720.100.963chnS GO:0001580 GO:0001792 GO:0001895 GO:0002415 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0007173 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0038093 GO:0043113 GO:0043235 GO:0070062
10.060.2647.870.040.433dmkA GO:0003823 GO:0005887 GO:0006909 GO:0007411 GO:0007413 GO:0007419 GO:0007422 GO:0008046 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016319 GO:0021551 GO:0030424 GO:0030425 GO:0032490 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043005 GO:0043025 GO:0048666 GO:0048814 GO:0048846 GO:0050770 GO:0050976 GO:0070593
20.060.2776.630.040.403b43A
30.060.2586.170.040.352jllA GO:0005886 GO:0007155 GO:0007158 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030424
40.060.2496.730.050.372v5yA GO:0001937 GO:0004721 GO:0004725 GO:0005001 GO:0005737 GO:0005887 GO:0005911 GO:0005913 GO:0006470 GO:0007155 GO:0007156 GO:0007165 GO:0010596 GO:0010842 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016311 GO:0016525 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0030027 GO:0031175 GO:0031290 GO:0035335 GO:0042493 GO:0042802 GO:0045296 GO:0045909 GO:0048471
50.060.2324.880.050.291nqbA GO:0003823 GO:0006910 GO:0006911 GO:0006958 GO:0009897 GO:0034987 GO:0042571 GO:0042742 GO:0045087 GO:0050853 GO:0050871 GO:0072562
60.060.2305.870.030.324w4oC GO:0002376 GO:0002479 GO:0005057 GO:0005886 GO:0006898 GO:0006911 GO:0006955 GO:0007165 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019864 GO:0030669 GO:0031901 GO:0038096 GO:0045087 GO:0050776 GO:0060333
70.060.2135.960.050.294xb7A GO:0003823 GO:0005887 GO:0006909 GO:0007411 GO:0007413 GO:0007419 GO:0007422 GO:0008046 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016319 GO:0021551 GO:0030424 GO:0030425 GO:0032490 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043005 GO:0043025 GO:0048666 GO:0048814 GO:0048846 GO:0050770 GO:0050976 GO:0070593
80.060.2196.290.020.314x9iB GO:0003823 GO:0005887 GO:0006909 GO:0007411 GO:0007413 GO:0007419 GO:0007422 GO:0008046 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016319 GO:0021551 GO:0030424 GO:0030425 GO:0032490 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043005 GO:0043025 GO:0048666 GO:0048814 GO:0048846 GO:0050770 GO:0050976 GO:0070593
90.060.2205.900.080.293lafA GO:0001975 GO:0003713 GO:0005042 GO:0005886 GO:0006915 GO:0007275 GO:0007399 GO:0007411 GO:0010976 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0030424 GO:0032584 GO:0038007 GO:0042802 GO:0045121 GO:0070374 GO:1903506
100.060.2234.270.050.264f9lA GO:0002250 GO:0002376 GO:0005886 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0050663 GO:0050798 GO:0050852 GO:0072643
110.060.2256.330.050.314x9fA GO:0003823 GO:0005887 GO:0006909 GO:0007411 GO:0007413 GO:0007419 GO:0007422 GO:0008046 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016319 GO:0021551 GO:0030424 GO:0030425 GO:0032490 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0043005 GO:0043025 GO:0048666 GO:0048814 GO:0048846 GO:0050770 GO:0050976 GO:0070593
120.060.2204.640.050.262p1yA
130.060.2135.290.080.283m8oL
140.060.2115.060.040.272arjA
150.060.2094.880.050.261ry7B GO:0000165 GO:0000166 GO:0001501 GO:0001958 GO:0002062 GO:0003416 GO:0004672 GO:0004713 GO:0004714 GO:0005007 GO:0005088 GO:0005524 GO:0005576 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005783 GO:0005794 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0005925 GO:0006468 GO:0006915 GO:0007259 GO:0007267 GO:0008284 GO:0008543 GO:0009986 GO:0010518 GO:0014066 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016023 GO:0016301 GO:0016303 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0017134 GO:0018108 GO:0030133 GO:0030282 GO:0031410 GO:0035988 GO:0036092 GO:0042511 GO:0042517 GO:0043410 GO:0043547 GO:0043552 GO:0046777 GO:0046854 GO:0046934 GO:0048015 GO:0048640 GO:0060349 GO:0070374 GO:0070977 GO:1902178
160.060.1853.340.060.201indH
170.060.2234.310.060.264hh8A GO:0016020 GO:0016021
180.060.2044.840.030.264bfiA GO:0004872 GO:0005886 GO:0009897 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0043235


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0019763
GO-Score 0.40
Biological Processes GO:0050912 GO:0050913 GO:0002414 GO:0002386 GO:0072657 GO:0038127 GO:0051668 GO:0002768 GO:0001894
GO-Score 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Cellular Component GO:0031226 GO:0031988 GO:1903561 GO:0043234 GO:0016021
GO-Score 0.60 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.34

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.