[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3527

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.17 8 1ee8A ZN Rep, Mult 78,81,107,126
20.07 3 3mmhA MG Rep, Mult 21,136,137,140
30.07 3 4j4qA BOG Rep, Mult 118,130,133
40.04 2 1izlD PHO Rep, Mult 132,133,136,137
50.04 2 3kgwA PLP Rep, Mult 94,95
60.02 1 3wubA ZN Rep, Mult 131,135
70.02 1 3i0oA SMI Rep, Mult 109,113,116,117,128
80.02 1 4bo7D J2T Rep, Mult 11,15,128,132
90.02 1 2bkk0 III Rep, Mult 36,37,40,59,61,65,66,67,69,70,71,74
100.02 1 3r78B NA Rep, Mult 7,11,91

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0661l8tA0.7003.030.0800.9192.7.1.95NA
20.0601ky8A0.4814.610.0760.7851.2.1.9NA
30.0601zumI0.4764.240.0440.7521.2.1.3NA
40.0603f2sA0.6353.890.0690.9602.7.1.32NA
50.0602ckpA0.6173.770.0660.8932.7.1.32NA
60.0603en9A0.4962.670.0430.6243.4.24.57NA
70.0602vwbA0.4863.090.0420.6383.4.24.57NA
80.0602pulA0.6743.780.0620.9662.7.1.100131
90.0602ve5H0.4974.720.0650.8121.2.1.8NA
100.0601j7lA0.6973.030.0880.9192.7.1.95NA
110.0601uxvA0.4814.630.0760.7851.2.1.9110
120.0601nd4A0.7372.640.1170.9192.7.1.95NA
130.0602w8oA0.5204.410.0600.8261.2.1.24140
140.0603ifh60.4994.360.0460.7991.2.1.1614
150.0602w8nA0.5164.300.0600.8121.2.1.24NA
160.0603enhA0.4853.080.0320.6383.4.24.57NA
170.0603ju8A0.4904.450.0540.7921.2.1.71NA
180.0602vroB0.4814.470.0610.7721.2.1.3NA
190.0603k2wB0.5094.370.0460.8051.2.1.8NA
200.0603fg0C0.5054.360.0690.7851.2.1.8NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.180.8072.510.120.994h05B GO:0005524 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046677
10.130.7182.840.160.924gkiA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0008910 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046677
20.130.7372.640.120.921nd4A GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0008910 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
30.110.7003.010.080.922b0qA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0008910 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046677
40.070.6043.970.040.903hamA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0016740
50.070.6013.580.070.874dfbB GO:0000166
60.060.3645.490.070.704b7sA GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0017000 GO:0020037 GO:0033068 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
70.060.3195.150.040.563berA GO:0000166 GO:0003676 GO:0003723 GO:0004004 GO:0004386 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005730 GO:0006364 GO:0006397 GO:0006915 GO:0008380 GO:0008625 GO:0010501 GO:0016020 GO:0016787 GO:0044822
80.060.6064.080.090.954pdyA GO:0016740
90.060.2975.670.050.573l84A GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
100.060.3964.260.050.625i4nA GO:0000165 GO:0000166 GO:0000186 GO:0002250 GO:0002376 GO:0004672 GO:0004713 GO:0004715 GO:0005088 GO:0005102 GO:0005131 GO:0005143 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005856 GO:0005901 GO:0006468 GO:0006915 GO:0006919 GO:0006928 GO:0006979 GO:0007165 GO:0007167 GO:0007186 GO:0007204 GO:0007259 GO:0007260 GO:0007262 GO:0007498 GO:0007596 GO:0008022 GO:0008284 GO:0008285 GO:0008631 GO:0009755 GO:0010667 GO:0010811 GO:0012505 GO:0014068 GO:0016020 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016363 GO:0016477 GO:0016568 GO:0016740 GO:0018108 GO:0019221 GO:0019901 GO:0020037 GO:0022408 GO:0030041 GO:0030154 GO:0030218 GO:0030335 GO:0031103 GO:0031234 GO:0031702 GO:0031904 GO:0031959 GO:0032024 GO:0032496 GO:0032516 GO:0032731 GO:0032760 GO:0033130 GO:0033160 GO:0033194 GO:0033209 GO:0034612 GO:0035401 GO:0035409 GO:0035556 GO:0035722 GO:0038083 GO:0042127 GO:0042169 GO:0042393 GO:0042503 GO:0042506 GO:0042508 GO:0042517 GO:0042523 GO:0042977 GO:0042981 GO:0043065 GO:0043388 GO:0043392 GO:0043524 GO:0043547 GO:0043548 GO:0043560 GO:0045087 GO:0045121 GO:0045429 GO:0045597 GO:0045822 GO:0046677 GO:0046777 GO:0046872 GO:0048008 GO:0050727 GO:0050729 GO:0050731 GO:0050867 GO:0051091 GO:0051428 GO:0051770 GO:0060333 GO:0060334 GO:0060396 GO:0060397 GO:0060399 GO:0061180 GO:0070671 GO:0097191 GO:0097296
110.060.2385.060.070.442kucA GO:0000103 GO:0005737 GO:0006457 GO:0006662 GO:0015035 GO:0016671 GO:0016853 GO:0034599 GO:0045454 GO:0055114
120.060.3015.220.030.544yorA GO:0004527 GO:0090305
130.060.3145.410.060.583alnA GO:0000165 GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0004702 GO:0004713 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006468 GO:0006915 GO:0007165 GO:0007254 GO:0009611 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0018108 GO:0035897 GO:0038095 GO:0071260 GO:2000672
140.060.3625.090.070.643lidA GO:0000155 GO:0000160 GO:0005622 GO:0023014
150.060.3345.470.060.624uw0A GO:0004672 GO:0005524 GO:0006468
160.060.2623.540.070.381awcB GO:0005634 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0044212 GO:0045944 GO:0046982
170.060.3325.480.050.614ax8A GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0005524 GO:0005886 GO:0006468 GO:0008168 GO:0009103 GO:0009243 GO:0016020 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0032259
180.060.2404.630.040.392cs5A GO:0004721 GO:0004725 GO:0004726 GO:0005737 GO:0005856 GO:0005886 GO:0006470 GO:0008092 GO:0009898 GO:0016020 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0035335


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005524 GO:0008910
GO-Score 0.49 0.33
Biological Processes GO:0046677 GO:0016310
GO-Score 0.45 0.33
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.