[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3521

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 4 2wscK CLA Rep, Mult 167,171
20.05 2 2j0tC CA Rep, Mult 244,245,277,279,281
30.05 2 3frpA CA Rep, Mult 233,254,255,257
40.02 1 2h2gA ZN Rep, Mult 163,165
50.02 1 3unxA CA Rep, Mult 233,234
60.02 1 4f6xA MG Rep, Mult 91,158
70.02 1 1cg0A MG Rep, Mult 242,263
80.02 1 2d2mB HEM Rep, Mult 170,174
90.02 1 3dasA ARA Rep, Mult 242,261,263,264,265,297
100.02 1 2hcnA CA Rep, Mult 24,242
110.02 1 1j6xB MET Rep, Mult 215,218
120.02 1 1qezA MG Rep, Mult 242,281
130.02 1 3lfiA BGC Rep, Mult 13,219,238
140.02 1 3irbA ZN Rep, Mult 182,185,196,199
150.02 1 3fyeD HEA Rep, Mult 152,155
160.02 1 1b25A SF4 Rep, Mult 188,240,241,244,246,247,248
170.02 1 4g7hD NUC Rep, Mult 26,300

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603dc8A0.3686.620.0580.6343.5.2.2196
20.0602aepA0.3656.140.0450.5913.2.1.18NA
30.0602vr2A0.3726.610.0580.6443.5.2.2NA
40.0601yiqA0.3836.190.0260.6401.1.99.-NA
50.0602ebsB0.3925.900.0410.6343.2.1.150NA
60.0601n2lA0.3676.740.0510.6703.1.6.8NA
70.0601nn2A0.3636.140.0450.5913.2.1.18NA
80.0602ftwA0.3736.680.0350.6503.5.2.2254
90.0601oqzB0.3826.120.0640.6303.5.1.93NA
100.0602w68C0.2215.400.0140.3273.2.1.18242
110.0601kv9A0.3646.070.0710.5941.1.99.-NA
120.0601v0zA0.3356.960.0570.6143.2.1.18NA
130.0601euuA0.3416.710.0580.6043.2.1.18239,243
140.0601xmeA0.3686.640.0430.6471.9.3.1190
150.0602cmlC0.3646.090.0660.5883.2.1.18NA
160.0602aeyA0.3826.710.0620.6733.2.1.80NA
170.0601bxrA0.3747.060.0420.6936.3.5.5NA
180.0602qnoA0.3946.720.0280.6963.2.1.4214
190.0602ac1A0.3856.630.0450.6733.2.1.26NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.060.4246.290.070.723ldkA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
10.060.3966.890.040.705fkqA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0030247 GO:0030248
20.060.3956.040.030.645jwzA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0030246 GO:0030247
30.060.4151.940.140.443irbA GO:0046872
40.060.3886.340.050.664z3wC GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0016625 GO:0051536 GO:0055114
50.060.3875.810.060.622cn3A GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0033946 GO:0043263 GO:2000899
60.060.3806.690.070.661y4wA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0051669
70.060.3935.760.040.622cn2A GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0033946 GO:0043263 GO:2000899
80.060.3916.140.040.654amwA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0016829 GO:0030246 GO:0047457
90.060.4086.270.050.691b25A GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0016625 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051539 GO:0055114
100.060.3745.950.070.614kwuA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0046872
110.060.3176.790.040.575aedA GO:0003824 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246
120.060.3387.040.040.621uypA GO:0004553 GO:0004564 GO:0004575 GO:0005975 GO:0005987 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
130.060.3916.860.040.704lgnA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0030246 GO:0030247 GO:0030248
140.060.3346.430.040.573b7fA GO:0016787
150.060.3546.330.070.592berA GO:0004308 GO:0005576 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0052794 GO:0052795 GO:0052796
160.060.3596.770.060.645annA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
170.060.3925.900.040.632ebsB GO:0000272 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0033945
180.060.3476.840.030.613kf5A GO:0004553 GO:0004564 GO:0004575 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016798
GO-Score 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0044238
GO-Score 0.31
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.