[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3489

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.29 17 3tceB LYZ Rep, Mult 33,37
20.06 4 1s56B XE Rep, Mult 20,24,42,44,46
30.06 4 3mmhA MG Rep, Mult 27,38,41
40.05 3 4ilbA UNL Rep, Mult 28,31
50.05 3 1iruK MG Rep, Mult 36,39
60.02 1 4eneA DMU Rep, Mult 40,44

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602jguA0.5283.230.1040.8892.7.7.7NA
20.0602vdcL0.5442.790.0400.8701.4.1.1326
30.0601gehA0.5293.180.0960.9264.1.1.39NA
40.0602wdqA0.5403.040.0820.9071.3.99.1NA
50.0601gehC0.5293.190.0960.9264.1.1.39NA
60.0603hriA0.4453.100.0470.7416.1.1.21NA
70.0603netA0.5842.650.0740.8706.1.1.2148
80.0603fhgA0.5252.580.1300.9074.2.99.1837
90.0601rblA0.3644.020.0580.7594.1.1.39NA
100.0602hvgA0.5263.640.1320.9824.3.2.2NA
110.0602hwgA0.5692.730.0850.8152.7.3.9NA
120.0601gk8A0.5343.110.0580.9264.1.1.39NA
130.0603im9A0.5572.850.0560.8892.3.1.3917,22
140.0601zxiC0.5282.650.1200.8521.2.99.2NA
150.0602jf2A0.5543.080.0960.9072.3.1.129NA
160.0601nm2A0.5393.200.1110.9072.3.1.39NA
170.0601zq9A0.5542.930.1200.9262.1.1.-NA
180.0601knpA0.5273.240.0410.9071.4.3.16NA
190.0601svdA0.3684.030.0770.7594.1.1.39NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.5592.800.130.894phcA GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874 GO:0032543
10.070.5522.580.110.854yrcA GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874
20.070.5252.220.070.782q37A GO:0001560 GO:0003824 GO:0005777 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006144 GO:0008152 GO:0009742 GO:0016020 GO:0016787 GO:0016829 GO:0016831 GO:0019428 GO:0019628 GO:0031234 GO:0033971 GO:0051289 GO:0051997
30.070.3913.480.000.783s9vB GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0046872 GO:0050554 GO:0050559
40.070.5042.870.120.873racA GO:0004821 GO:0005737 GO:0016874
50.070.4542.960.070.781qe0A GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874
60.070.5062.850.110.831wu7A GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874
70.070.4553.080.050.743hriF GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874
80.070.4823.220.070.804e51A GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874
90.070.4522.970.070.781qe0B GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874
100.070.4723.070.060.852o70F GO:0005777 GO:0006144 GO:0016829 GO:0016831 GO:0019428 GO:0019628
110.070.4573.090.040.761httA GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874
120.070.4503.160.040.761kmmC GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874
130.070.4832.960.100.873mopK GO:0000166 GO:0000187 GO:0001959 GO:0002224 GO:0002755 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006468 GO:0006954 GO:0007165 GO:0007249 GO:0007254 GO:0010008 GO:0031663 GO:0032088 GO:0034162 GO:0042803 GO:0043433 GO:0046982 GO:0051092 GO:0070423 GO:0070498 GO:0070555
140.070.4572.650.100.802o8iA GO:0019428
150.070.4724.140.040.893hjbA GO:0004347 GO:0005737 GO:0006094 GO:0006096 GO:0016853
160.070.4493.180.070.761adjA GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006412 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874
170.070.3583.240.080.673rc1A GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
180.060.4453.100.050.743hriA GO:0004812 GO:0004821 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006418 GO:0006427 GO:0016874


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004812
GO-Score 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0006427 GO:0032543 GO:0019628 GO:0001560 GO:0019428 GO:0009742 GO:0051289 GO:0006144
GO-Score 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Cellular Component GO:0044424
GO-Score 0.37

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.