[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3439c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.07 4 2ckjB FES Rep, Mult 230,231,232,233,296,297,301
20.04 2 3fbyC CA Rep, Mult 387,389,391,393,394,400
30.04 2 4ty0A MG Rep, Mult 359,361
40.04 2 5l8gV CA Rep, Mult 117,128,131
50.04 2 4edgA MN Rep, Mult 13,61,63
60.02 1 1ecyA UUU Rep, Mult 454,456,464
70.02 1 2vn4A MAN Rep, Mult 252,253
80.02 1 3favC ZN Rep, Mult 52,56
90.02 1 1v97A FES Rep, Mult 226,227,231,233,234,235,236,297
100.02 1 3wmoP BCL Rep, Mult 88,89
110.02 1 1i40A CA Rep, Mult 384,388
120.02 1 3attA MG Rep, Mult 147,148
130.02 1 4x23P III Rep, Mult 73,76
140.02 1 5jqhB CLR Rep, Mult 114,139,140
150.02 1 4amjB 2CV Rep, Mult 68,69
160.02 1 3ze3D 78M Rep, Mult 78,81,85,89
170.02 1 2e84A ZN Rep, Mult 396,400
180.02 1 2ckjD PO4 Rep, Mult 260,278,280,282,295
190.02 1 1wygA CA Rep, Mult 327,445,446,447,449
200.02 1 3wmnU CRT Rep, Mult 103,114

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601bglA0.3287.500.0510.5483.2.1.23370
20.0603btaA0.3266.070.0270.4633.4.24.69NA
30.0601fa9A0.3147.230.0400.5182.4.1.1NA
40.0602cseW0.3267.560.0380.5573.6.4.13NA
50.0601z0hB0.2576.720.0560.4053.4.24.69NA
60.0601e1yA0.3007.350.0360.4972.4.1.1453
70.0602x58A0.3247.080.0470.5185.3.3.8,4.2.1.17,1.1.1.35NA
80.0602rhqB0.3137.400.0460.5226.1.1.20NA
90.0601zcjA0.2447.560.0560.4181.1.1.35NA
100.0601h16A0.3457.830.0380.6082.3.1.54NA
110.0602vuaA0.2677.400.0150.4503.4.24.69NA
120.0601s46A0.3177.200.0490.5182.4.1.4NA
130.0601g5aA0.3177.220.0490.5182.4.1.4NA
140.0603k1dA0.3156.990.0390.5032.4.1.18350
150.0603b8eA0.3287.510.0370.5443.6.3.9NA
160.0602vdcF0.3167.710.0300.5481.4.1.13NA
170.0603b9jI0.1384.840.0660.1801.17.1.4,1.17.3.2NA
180.0601w27A0.3237.650.0530.5554.3.1.24NA
190.0603b9jJ0.1946.390.0180.2891.17.1.4,1.17.3.2217

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.220.8982.560.100.974ut1A GO:0005198 GO:0009424 GO:0044780
10.070.6373.470.090.722d4yA GO:0005198 GO:0005576 GO:0009288 GO:0009424 GO:0044780 GO:0071973
20.060.2678.030.030.484n0rA GO:0005975
30.060.2537.630.050.443ictA GO:0000166 GO:0003756 GO:0005623 GO:0016491 GO:0045454 GO:0050451 GO:0050660 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
40.060.2517.250.060.414cnjA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
50.060.2346.590.050.361n8pA GO:0003824 GO:0003962 GO:0004123 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0016829 GO:0019343 GO:0019344 GO:0019346 GO:0030170 GO:0042802 GO:0044540 GO:0071266 GO:0080146
60.060.2547.280.050.422wssA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005739 GO:0005743 GO:0005753 GO:0005886 GO:0006754 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0015986 GO:0015991 GO:0015992 GO:0016020 GO:0016820 GO:0033178 GO:0045261 GO:0046034 GO:0046933 GO:0046961
70.060.2127.360.040.353v7dB GO:0000082 GO:0000086 GO:0004842 GO:0005634 GO:0007049 GO:0007067 GO:0007126 GO:0016363 GO:0016567 GO:0019005 GO:0030435 GO:0031146 GO:0042787 GO:0043130 GO:0043224 GO:0050815 GO:0051301 GO:0061630
80.060.2327.500.060.403peiA GO:0004177 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0016787 GO:0019538 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
90.060.2146.960.050.354pmxA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0031176 GO:0045493 GO:0046872
100.060.2046.800.040.332exxA GO:0000050 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0048471
110.060.2176.870.060.342cb1A GO:0003824 GO:0016829 GO:0030170
120.060.2307.600.030.391sezA GO:0004729 GO:0005739 GO:0006779 GO:0006782 GO:0006783 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
130.060.1926.550.050.292ip2A GO:0008168 GO:0008171 GO:0008757 GO:0016740 GO:0019438 GO:0032259
140.060.1926.930.030.314dppA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0008840 GO:0009085 GO:0009089 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0016829 GO:0019877
150.060.2176.690.030.345chsB GO:0000166 GO:0001172 GO:0003824 GO:0003968 GO:0004482 GO:0005524 GO:0006139 GO:0006370 GO:0006397 GO:0008152 GO:0008168 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0019012 GO:0030430 GO:0032259 GO:0036265 GO:0039689
160.060.2017.190.040.334hnnF GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008840 GO:0009089 GO:0016829
170.060.1746.620.050.274q16D GO:0000166 GO:0003952 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008795 GO:0009435 GO:0016874
180.060.2037.300.060.341qzzA GO:0008168 GO:0008171 GO:0016829 GO:0016831 GO:0017000 GO:0032259


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005198 GO:0050661 GO:0050451 GO:0050660 GO:0003756
GO-Score 0.28 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Biological Processes GO:0030031 GO:0044781 GO:0070925
GO-Score 0.55 0.55 0.55
Cellular Component GO:0044461
GO-Score 0.55

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.