[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3437

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.05 3 2xawA III Rep, Mult 68,69,71,72,83,103
20.05 3 4z9vB III Rep, Mult 73,78,81,82,85
30.05 3 2x0xA III Rep, Mult 85,86,88,89,110
40.05 3 4ct4B MG Rep, Mult 57,58,59
50.03 2 2eh3A MG Rep, Mult 59,62
60.03 2 2r1rA III Rep, Mult 64,66,67,68,69,100
70.03 2 1brrC ARC Rep, Mult 64,84,88
80.03 2 6r1rA III Rep, Mult 72,73,74,75,76,105
90.02 1 3qv4C UUU Rep, Mult 77,141,145,146
100.02 1 2a01B AC9 Rep, Mult 60,64
110.02 1 1m56B HEA Rep, Mult 45,128
120.02 1 1rwtB CLA Rep, Mult 140,143
130.02 1 2j7wA GTP Rep, Mult 27,58,66,147,148
140.02 1 3e2vA MG Rep, Mult 40,106
150.02 1 1aczA GLC Rep, Mult 78,148
160.02 1 2boqA ZN Rep, Mult 115,134
170.02 1 2wse4 CLA Rep, Mult 99,114

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602d1cA0.4914.870.0760.8041.1.1.42NA
20.0601w0dD0.4934.660.0650.7971.1.1.85NA
30.0601t09B0.4934.980.0490.8171.1.1.4239,52
40.0601w0dA0.5025.000.0560.8171.1.1.85NA
50.0601cnzA0.4784.650.0540.7591.1.1.8559
60.0603blvC0.4844.690.0520.7591.1.1.41NA
70.0601ug9A0.4864.960.0760.8293.2.1.7062
80.0602hi1A0.4845.270.0570.8291.1.1.26240,72,97,105
90.0601ayqB0.4964.940.0820.8171.1.1.85NA
100.0601dr0A0.5045.040.0830.8291.1.1.85NA
110.0603blvH0.5084.790.1110.8171.1.1.41NA
120.0602cvtA0.4944.240.0320.7471.17.4.172
130.0601bglA0.4894.770.0320.7913.2.1.23NA
140.0601t09A0.4935.020.0670.8231.1.1.42NA
150.0601zyzA0.4834.190.0340.7341.17.4.172
160.0605r1rA0.5154.850.0320.8481.17.4.1NA
170.0602iv0A0.5184.880.0410.8481.1.1.42NA
180.0601a05A0.4845.000.0900.8171.1.1.85NA
190.0602dhtA0.5274.780.0540.8541.1.1.42NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.4944.780.060.792g4oA GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0040007 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
10.070.4985.020.090.824iwhA GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
20.070.5184.880.040.852iv0A GO:0000287 GO:0004450 GO:0006097 GO:0006099 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
30.070.5274.780.050.852dhtA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004450 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
40.070.4994.830.090.802y42D GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0042802 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
50.070.4994.940.070.821cm7A GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0030145 GO:0034198 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
60.070.4885.280.070.843ty3A GO:0000287 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0008652 GO:0009085 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0019878 GO:0046872 GO:0047046 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
70.070.4855.040.060.825j32A GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0009570 GO:0009941 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
80.070.4934.830.070.803blvC GO:0000287 GO:0003723 GO:0003824 GO:0004449 GO:0005739 GO:0005758 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0005962 GO:0006099 GO:0006102 GO:0006537 GO:0006626 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0042645 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
90.070.4845.000.090.821a05A GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
100.070.4904.820.060.791vlcA GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
110.070.4994.950.070.823uduA GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
120.070.5084.790.110.823blvH GO:0000287 GO:0003723 GO:0003824 GO:0004449 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0005962 GO:0006099 GO:0006102 GO:0006537 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
130.070.4914.870.080.802d1cA GO:0000287 GO:0004450 GO:0006097 GO:0006099 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
140.070.4685.070.040.782uxqA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0004450 GO:0006099 GO:0006102 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
150.070.4914.830.090.781wpwA GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
160.070.4825.040.050.774y1pB GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
170.070.4935.130.050.843ah3A GO:0000287 GO:0008652 GO:0009085 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0019878 GO:0046872 GO:0047046 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
180.070.4855.120.060.813vmkA GO:0000287 GO:0003862 GO:0005737 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0050662 GO:0016614 GO:0046872 GO:0000166
GO-Score 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Biological Processes GO:1901566 GO:0009081 GO:0046394 GO:0006551
GO-Score 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0044424
GO-Score 0.37

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.