[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3304

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 1 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.13 4 3jucA PCA Rep, Mult 6,7,8,9,10,49,79,86
20.12 4 3orcA NUC Rep, Mult 9,10
30.09 3 2zbkF RDC Rep, Mult 128,129,131,132,142,148
40.04 1 2pn70 III Rep, Mult 53,54,56,84,86,87,88,89,90,92,108,113,114
50.03 1 1z5cA PO4 Rep, Mult 121,122,124,126,127,128
60.03 1 1ux1A THU Rep, Mult 5,6,7
70.03 1 2buqA CAQ Rep, Mult 120,124
80.03 1 2z7xB III Rep, Mult 136,138,141
90.03 1 3ltwA HLZ Rep, Mult 10,11,16,19,79

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.2383jucA0.6423.180.1370.7992.3.2.43,7,76,87
20.0602kl2A0.6173.570.1570.8112.3.2.47,65,75,110
30.0601q1dB0.4174.990.0520.7115.99.1.3NA
40.0601fw8A0.4124.890.0400.6792.7.2.38,12,125
50.0601bgaA0.4115.010.0520.7113.2.1.21130
60.0601qqwB0.4095.220.0610.7361.11.1.674
70.0601vcmA0.4064.900.0570.6926.3.4.2125
80.0603c39A0.3645.480.0310.6732.7.2.3NA
90.06013pkA0.4025.140.0310.7172.7.2.3NA
100.0601vcoA0.4054.560.0750.6676.3.4.2NA
110.0602nvrA0.3674.890.0480.6103.5.1.98130,133
120.0602j2mA0.4085.410.0270.7481.11.1.6NA
130.0601a4eA0.4065.340.0340.7551.11.1.6NA
140.0601m7sD0.4035.550.0340.7551.11.1.6NA
150.0601gweA0.4105.310.0470.7481.11.1.6NA
160.0601kf0A0.4114.900.0560.6792.7.2.3NA
170.0601ajbA0.4065.060.0660.6923.1.3.1151
180.0602rbhA0.9520.770.2450.9752.3.2.44,8,10,31,76,89,110
190.0602vfbA0.4154.270.0710.6542.3.1.5NA
200.0601u60C0.3965.380.0210.7173.5.1.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.440.9500.790.240.973cryA GO:0001836 GO:0003839 GO:0005829 GO:0006750 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0042803 GO:0070062
10.290.8141.890.200.912qikA GO:0016740 GO:0016746
20.240.6192.710.130.732g0qA GO:0016740 GO:0016746
30.240.6423.180.140.803jucA GO:0003839 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0042219 GO:0070062
40.200.5892.770.160.712jqvA
50.190.6173.570.160.812kl2A GO:0003839 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0042219 GO:0070062
60.170.5762.900.110.725c5zA GO:0016740
70.160.5602.900.140.681v30A GO:0016740 GO:0016746
80.140.5462.600.180.661xhsA GO:0005829
90.060.3304.750.030.534ax3D GO:0005507 GO:0006807 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0020037 GO:0046872 GO:0050421 GO:0055114
100.060.3225.220.050.584hecB GO:0000287 GO:0003676 GO:0004518 GO:0004527 GO:0004532 GO:0008408 GO:0016787 GO:0040007 GO:0046872 GO:0090305 GO:0090503
110.060.2945.520.030.544c2dD GO:0006508 GO:0006518 GO:0007165 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0016787 GO:0030435 GO:0042277 GO:0042802 GO:0042803
120.060.2994.950.040.485a6cB GO:0000132 GO:0000166 GO:0000922 GO:0001965 GO:0005092 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005856 GO:0005886 GO:0005911 GO:0005912 GO:0005913 GO:0005938 GO:0007052 GO:0007155 GO:0007165 GO:0007186 GO:0007267 GO:0008022 GO:0017016 GO:0030054 GO:0030695 GO:0034332 GO:0042802 GO:0043547 GO:0045177 GO:0050790 GO:0051661 GO:0060487 GO:0090557 GO:0097431 GO:0098609 GO:0098641
130.060.3135.620.070.584jhrA GO:0000132 GO:0000166 GO:0000922 GO:0001965 GO:0005092 GO:0005737 GO:0005856 GO:0005938 GO:0007052 GO:0030695 GO:0042802 GO:0045177 GO:0050790 GO:0051661 GO:0060487 GO:0097431
140.060.3355.220.030.583l84A GO:0003824 GO:0004802 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
150.060.2845.190.040.491jzuA GO:0002376 GO:0005215 GO:0005576 GO:0006629 GO:0006810 GO:0036094 GO:0042742 GO:0045087 GO:0050544 GO:0070538 GO:1903981
160.060.2825.000.020.451spgB GO:0005344 GO:0005506 GO:0005833 GO:0006810 GO:0015671 GO:0019825 GO:0020037 GO:0046872
170.060.3245.620.060.604aoeA GO:0005230 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0034220
180.060.2644.770.080.433lasA GO:0004089 GO:0008270 GO:0016829 GO:0046872
190.060.2314.940.040.403gnjA GO:0005623 GO:0006662 GO:0015035 GO:0045454 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003839 GO:0042803
GO-Score 0.57 0.43
Biological Processes GO:1901565 GO:0006750 GO:0001836
GO-Score 0.47 0.43 0.43
Cellular Component GO:0070062 GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.57 0.43

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.