[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3284

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 3 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 4 3jz0A APC Rep, Mult 118,124
20.06 3 1n38A CH1 Rep, Mult 95,96,104,132
30.06 3 4bo4B 36G Rep, Mult 84,87,88,91,127,130,131,134
40.04 2 4il6x CLA Rep, Mult 127,128
50.02 1 2nr9A PA6 Rep, Mult 135,139
60.02 1 2h6bA 3C4 Rep, Mult 132,135
70.02 1 3rkoC LFA Rep, Mult 83,86,90,95
80.02 1 3zvwC MG Rep, Mult 51,52
90.02 1 3t1gA ZN Rep, Mult 97,102
100.02 1 2z51A MG Rep, Mult 69,97
110.02 1 1iw7F MG Rep, Mult 124,126
120.02 1 2bq8X ZN Rep, Mult 13,17
130.02 1 3jskD AHZ Rep, Mult 100,102
140.02 1 1e6yA F43 Rep, Mult 35,36,37,38,86,89
150.02 1 4g1vA NO2 Rep, Mult 111,132
160.02 1 3rl3A MN Rep, Mult 94,96
170.02 1 3s5yA FUC Rep, Mult 87,124

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603gh4A0.4914.700.0550.8463.2.1.52108
20.0601w07B0.4604.800.1060.7621.3.3.6NA
30.0601e6yA0.5394.310.0700.8392.8.4.1NA
40.0602ckpA0.4514.370.0600.7342.7.1.32NA
50.0601n1hA0.5114.730.0440.8742.7.7.48NA
60.0602np0A0.3994.920.0390.6993.4.24.69NA
70.0602fonB0.4594.560.1010.7411.3.3.6NA
80.0602ckpB0.4474.480.0600.7342.7.1.32NA
90.0601hp4A0.4984.710.0610.8603.2.1.5296,97
100.0601fo4A0.4684.160.0570.7271.17.1.4NA
110.0602pulA0.4614.910.0490.8462.7.1.100NA
120.0602qcxB0.4594.740.1140.7763.5.99.231,37,77,79,111
130.0601p2yA0.4465.040.0580.7761.14.15.1NA
140.0602npxA0.4613.740.0230.6641.11.1.119,92,117
150.0603b9jC0.3415.060.0490.6361.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
160.0602e1qA0.4714.170.0570.7271.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
170.0602pywA0.4694.660.0760.8042.7.1.100NA
180.0603bpwA0.4783.970.0550.7274.1.1.23114
190.0601f7uA0.4653.710.0390.6716.1.1.19NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.370.6783.190.230.931ni7A GO:0016226
10.350.7672.460.170.933g0mA GO:0005737 GO:0006790 GO:0016226
20.330.7542.550.160.931mzgA GO:0005737 GO:0006790 GO:0006810 GO:0006979 GO:0008047 GO:0016226 GO:0031162 GO:0043085 GO:0097163
30.170.6263.310.120.842qq4A GO:0005506 GO:0016226 GO:0046872 GO:0051536
40.130.5913.220.100.804eb5C GO:0005506 GO:0016226 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537
50.120.5913.230.100.802z7eB GO:0005506 GO:0005737 GO:0006879 GO:0008198 GO:0016226 GO:0036455 GO:0044571 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539 GO:0097428
60.090.6222.850.100.821su0B GO:0005506 GO:0016226 GO:0046872 GO:0051536
70.070.5143.200.090.702kqkA GO:0005506 GO:0005829 GO:0006879 GO:0008198 GO:0016226 GO:0036455 GO:0042802 GO:0044571 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539 GO:0097428
80.070.5633.510.080.792azhA GO:0005506 GO:0005737 GO:0006879 GO:0008198 GO:0016226 GO:0016740 GO:0036455 GO:0044571 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539 GO:0097428
90.070.5223.560.070.761wfzA GO:0005506 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0006879 GO:0008198 GO:0016226 GO:0032947 GO:0036455 GO:0044571 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539 GO:0097428
100.070.4933.780.060.711q48A GO:0005506 GO:0005737 GO:0006879 GO:0008198 GO:0016226 GO:0036455 GO:0044571 GO:0046872 GO:0051536 GO:0051537 GO:0051539 GO:0097428
110.060.4123.320.100.583r07C GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0009249 GO:0016874 GO:0016979 GO:0017118
120.060.3625.300.080.642hytA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
130.060.3205.350.070.622i5bA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0008478 GO:0008972 GO:0009228 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
140.060.3735.190.070.701zorA GO:0004450 GO:0006099 GO:0006102 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
150.060.3155.310.060.581ub0A GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0008972 GO:0009228 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
160.060.3704.480.040.621j6wA GO:0003824 GO:0005506 GO:0009372 GO:0016829 GO:0043768 GO:0046872
170.060.2995.920.060.624fxkC GO:0001849 GO:0002376 GO:0004252 GO:0004866 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0005886 GO:0006508 GO:0006954 GO:0006956 GO:0006958 GO:0010951 GO:0030449 GO:0045087 GO:0070062 GO:0072562 GO:2000427
180.060.2274.190.010.361k0vA GO:0005507 GO:0005737 GO:0006825 GO:0030001 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0051540 GO:0046914 GO:0008047 GO:0097163
GO-Score 0.56 0.56 0.33 0.33
Biological Processes GO:0016226 GO:0031162 GO:0006979 GO:0006810 GO:0043085
GO-Score 0.81 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33
Cellular Component GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.57

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.