[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3241c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.15 4 3v2eY NUC Rep, Mult 17,18,19,20,22,30,36,39,43,46,48,49,53,58,65,72,74,76,81,82,83,91,94,99,102,103,105,106,108,109,110,112
20.11 3 3v28X NUC Rep, Mult 19,42,43,57,58,81,82,83,99,103,108,109,110,111,112,127
30.04 1 4x23P III Rep, Mult 98,101
40.04 1 4fylA 3CO Rep, Mult 70,81,83
50.04 1 1c9uB CA Rep, Mult 175,177,186,203
60.04 1 4s1yA CPT Rep, Mult 99,204
70.04 1 1jb0M CLA Rep, Mult 92,96
80.04 1 4fylA 3CO Rep, Mult 55,70

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601dgjA0.4116.110.0220.7521.2.-.-39
20.0603h8eA0.4145.460.1010.6823.4.11.1NA
30.0603fk5A0.4145.810.0510.7102.3.1.41NA
40.0601afwB0.4095.450.0670.6872.3.1.16NA
50.0602gp6A0.4115.370.0780.6922.3.1.41168
60.0601b3nA0.4215.370.0590.7062.3.1.179,2.3.1.41NA
70.0601jroB0.4245.580.0400.7151.1.1.204NA
80.0602pflA0.4225.800.0530.7432.3.1.54170,195,200
90.0602gqdA0.4255.540.0630.7292.3.1.17928
100.0602hb6B0.3785.450.0610.6403.4.11.176
110.0602ac1A0.4095.120.0160.6643.2.1.2644
120.0601g72A0.4055.180.0480.6591.1.99.85
130.0601c9uB0.4605.520.0110.7801.1.5.2,1.1.99.17NA
140.0601m21A0.4075.710.0640.7103.5.1.-NA
150.0601tqyA0.4235.570.0630.7292.3.1.41NA
160.0602ix4A0.3756.010.0490.6642.3.1.41NA
170.0602p0uA0.4105.890.0660.7202.3.1.74107
180.0602aeyA0.4095.550.0170.6923.2.1.80NA
190.0601kitA0.4105.700.0640.7103.2.1.18NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.250.4011.610.290.434heiA GO:0044238
10.200.3712.090.360.422ywqC GO:0044238
20.180.3931.760.220.433tqmC GO:0044238
30.170.4801.890.170.531n3gA GO:0003723 GO:0005829 GO:0006417 GO:0009409 GO:0019843 GO:0022627 GO:0043024 GO:0044238 GO:0045900 GO:0045947
40.160.3872.200.280.442rqlA GO:0005829 GO:0006417 GO:0017148 GO:0043022 GO:0043024 GO:0044238
50.090.4132.080.160.461imuA GO:0006417 GO:0044238
60.080.3975.910.060.703a9gA GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0016901 GO:0046872 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
70.070.4225.700.050.731cm5A GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0006006 GO:0006567 GO:0008152 GO:0008861 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
80.060.4105.880.030.722g8sA GO:0003824 GO:0005509 GO:0005975 GO:0016491 GO:0016901 GO:0030288 GO:0046872 GO:0048038 GO:0055114 GO:0070968
90.060.4605.520.010.781c9uB GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0008876 GO:0016491 GO:0016901 GO:0046872 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
100.060.3415.690.030.583ho5B GO:0003824 GO:0005576 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0005975 GO:0007165 GO:0007224 GO:0007405 GO:0008270 GO:0009887 GO:0009953 GO:0009968 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016901 GO:0040036 GO:0045879 GO:0046872 GO:0048038 GO:0048705 GO:0055114 GO:0060170 GO:0060441 GO:0097108
110.060.3675.540.060.632wftB GO:0003824 GO:0005576 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0005975 GO:0007165 GO:0007224 GO:0007405 GO:0008270 GO:0009887 GO:0009953 GO:0009968 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016901 GO:0040036 GO:0045879 GO:0046872 GO:0048038 GO:0048705 GO:0055114 GO:0060170 GO:0060441 GO:0097108
120.060.4416.020.040.785bweA GO:0003824 GO:0008152
130.060.3375.670.040.582ismB GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0016901 GO:0046872 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
140.060.3695.600.040.642wg4B GO:0003824 GO:0005576 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0005975 GO:0007165 GO:0007224 GO:0007405 GO:0008270 GO:0009887 GO:0009953 GO:0009968 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016901 GO:0040036 GO:0045879 GO:0046872 GO:0048038 GO:0048705 GO:0055114 GO:0060170 GO:0060441 GO:0097108
150.060.3985.820.050.703dasA GO:0003824 GO:0005975 GO:0016901 GO:0046872 GO:0048038 GO:0055114
160.060.3346.020.050.593cb2A GO:0000086 GO:0000166 GO:0000212 GO:0000226 GO:0000242 GO:0000794 GO:0000930 GO:0003924 GO:0005200 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0005813 GO:0005814 GO:0005815 GO:0005827 GO:0005829 GO:0005856 GO:0005874 GO:0005876 GO:0005881 GO:0005929 GO:0007017 GO:0007020 GO:0031122 GO:0031252 GO:0031513 GO:0036064 GO:0045177 GO:0055037
170.060.3365.920.030.602qc5A GO:0000287 GO:0016835 GO:0017001 GO:0046677
180.060.4196.100.070.762f3oA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016829


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003723 GO:0043024
GO-Score 0.35 0.31
Biological Processes GO:0017148 GO:0006446 GO:0006950 GO:0006448 GO:0009266
GO-Score 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35
Cellular Component GO:0015935 GO:0022626
GO-Score 0.35 0.35

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.