[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3189

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.13 7 3be7E ARG Rep, Mult 33,90,91,92,133,135,149,168,171,176,190,193,194,197
20.10 5 3n2cA LWY Rep, Mult 33,84,90,91,93,133,135,149,173
30.04 2 2istA BCT Rep, Mult 63,66
40.04 2 2hn2D CA Rep, Mult 109,119
50.04 2 3aruA PNX Rep, Mult 87,116,117,120,131,132
60.02 1 2wl3A CA Rep, Mult 75,113
70.02 1 3leeD MG Rep, Mult 109,113
80.02 1 1ay5A MAE Rep, Mult 52,187
90.02 1 4gkhG 0J9 Rep, Mult 52,75,87,176
100.02 1 1y10D CA Rep, Mult 77,106
110.02 1 2hcbB MG Rep, Mult 30,96
120.02 1 3pg9A AZI Rep, Mult 66,119
130.02 1 2v8vD URP Rep, Mult 141,171

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603giqA0.5254.730.0910.7773.5.1.82124,132
20.0601m53A0.5295.230.0550.8455.4.99.12NA
30.0601itxA0.5334.460.0480.7573.2.1.14NA
40.0601bwkA0.5224.660.0470.7721.6.99.1NA
50.0602vncB0.4934.970.0470.7863.2.1.-NA
60.0602g3fA0.5223.650.0890.7093.5.2.7NA
70.0603b9eA0.5614.620.0260.8203.2.1.14NA
80.0601s46A0.5294.900.0370.8202.4.1.454
90.0601ydnA0.5253.890.0980.7434.1.3.4NA
100.0602ftwA0.5324.160.0620.7673.5.2.296
110.0601fa2A0.5324.530.0230.7773.2.1.2NA
120.0601tz9A0.5444.580.0330.8164.2.1.8NA
130.0601veoA0.5374.960.1120.8203.2.1.290,136
140.0601hp4A0.5434.640.0520.8203.2.1.52NA
150.0601kc7A0.5394.860.0840.8202.7.9.191
160.0603gbdA0.5285.200.0500.8505.4.99.11131,148
170.0602gokA0.5243.650.1030.7043.5.2.7NA
180.0601djnA0.5294.570.0540.7771.5.8.2,1.5.99.7NA
190.0601zjaA0.5295.190.0650.8455.4.99.11NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.150.7792.520.130.922qs8A GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0046872
10.130.7412.730.080.893mtwA GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0046872
20.130.7203.200.080.904c60A GO:0006508 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0016810 GO:0046872 GO:0102009 GO:1900817
30.130.7502.630.080.893be7A
40.120.7313.030.120.903mkvA GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0046872
50.120.7342.880.120.893n2cA
60.090.6613.040.090.832p9bA GO:0016787 GO:0016810
70.090.6323.890.120.894ub9A GO:0016787 GO:0016810
80.070.6223.890.110.884whbA GO:0016787 GO:0016810
90.070.5074.760.040.773ighX GO:0006259 GO:0016810 GO:0016888
100.070.4435.750.050.783hm7B GO:0000256 GO:0004038 GO:0006144 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0016812 GO:0046872 GO:0050897
110.070.5084.810.050.773griB GO:0004151 GO:0006221 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0016812 GO:0044205 GO:0046872
120.070.4425.320.060.724gz7A GO:0005737 GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0046872
130.070.5184.510.090.771nfgA GO:0005737 GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0046872
140.070.4944.960.070.773icjA GO:0006259 GO:0016810 GO:0016888 GO:0046872
150.070.5224.420.110.754l9xB GO:0004040 GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0046872
160.070.5114.350.030.754bjhA GO:0004151 GO:0006221 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0016812 GO:0044205 GO:0046872
170.070.4943.870.100.684dykA GO:0004000 GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0019700 GO:0046872 GO:0050270
180.070.5204.910.070.791m7jA GO:0016787 GO:0016810 GO:0016811 GO:0046872 GO:0047420


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0046872 GO:0016810
GO-Score 0.43 0.43
Biological Processes GO:0006508 GO:1900817
GO-Score 0.13 0.13
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.