[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3183

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.31 8 5k98P NUC Rep, Mult 45,53,64,65,68,72
20.07 2 1b0nA ZN Rep, Mult 36,102
30.04 1 1b0nA ZN Rep, Mult 33,99
40.03 1 1zz7B UUU Rep, Mult 34,74,77,85
50.03 1 3e62A 5B1 Rep, Mult 55,56,59,60,87
60.03 1 2z55B UUU Rep, Mult 60,61,62
70.03 1 2ofy0 III Rep, Mult 33,37,79,80,81,83,93,94,95,97,99

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603dqwA0.5154.070.0640.8532.7.10.2NA
20.0603dsiA0.5094.280.0380.8904.2.1.92NA
30.0603brbB0.5123.650.1080.7802.7.10.166
40.0601mqbB0.5153.750.0750.8072.7.10.1,2.7.1.11255,57
50.0602gqgA0.5173.780.0650.8352.7.10.255,57
60.0601p4oB0.5153.760.0870.7982.7.10.1,2.7.1.112NA
70.0602vwxA0.5043.680.0530.7802.7.10.155,57
80.0603e62A0.5233.920.0310.8532.7.10.255,57
90.0602dq7X0.5214.020.0640.8532.7.10.266
100.0602hz0B0.5003.630.0890.7802.7.10.2NA
110.0603gvuA0.5013.570.1170.7712.7.10.2NA
120.0602qi8A0.5064.050.0890.8072.7.10.255
130.0603d7uA0.5203.640.0890.8172.7.10.255,57
140.0601yolA0.5033.840.0670.7892.7.10.2,2.7.1.11237
150.0603fxxA0.5103.920.0970.8172.7.10.155,57
160.0601uedA0.5114.340.0410.8621.14.-.-NA
170.0601d0kA0.5274.180.0500.8814.2.2.-NA
180.0601yvjA0.5174.080.0930.8442.7.10.255,57
190.0602helA0.5044.100.0990.8172.7.10.1NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.290.5792.310.130.694i6uA GO:0003677 GO:0043565
10.270.5622.220.200.683f51A GO:0003677 GO:0043565
20.260.4801.970.270.581sq8A GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0043565
30.240.5102.330.190.624ghjB GO:0003677 GO:0043565
40.240.4872.700.170.632ef8A GO:0003677 GO:0043565
50.230.4762.010.210.582gzuA GO:0003677 GO:0043565
60.230.4882.690.210.624yg1A GO:0000985 GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0043565 GO:0045892
70.230.5373.000.230.713f6wA GO:0003677 GO:0043565
80.220.6392.280.220.783vk0A GO:0003677 GO:0043565
90.210.5392.210.250.653eusA GO:0003677 GO:0043565
100.190.5381.830.190.634jqdE GO:0003677 GO:0043565
110.180.5712.610.240.692b5aA
120.170.5572.220.180.675d4z1 GO:0003677 GO:0043565
130.160.5141.910.170.622ewtA GO:0003677 GO:0043565
140.160.5182.290.230.654o8bA GO:0003677 GO:0043565
150.150.5122.820.150.651x57A GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0003713 GO:0004402 GO:0005516 GO:0005622 GO:0005634 GO:0005669 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0007275 GO:0008168 GO:0019216 GO:0030154 GO:0043388 GO:0043565 GO:0044822 GO:0045446 GO:0045893 GO:0070062
160.140.5481.800.250.631y7yA GO:0003677 GO:0043565
170.110.4782.730.110.614ybaB GO:0003677 GO:0043565
180.070.5272.580.150.673b7hA GO:0003677 GO:0043565
190.070.5702.480.250.691y9qA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006355 GO:0043565 GO:0046872
200.070.5362.200.160.621b0nA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0010629 GO:0030435 GO:0043565 GO:0046983
210.070.4993.010.180.673kxaA GO:0003677 GO:0043565


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043565
GO-Score 0.78
Biological Processes GO:1903506 GO:2000112 GO:0010468
GO-Score 0.52 0.52 0.52
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.