[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3165c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 4 1jt0C QNA Rep, Mult 38,82,83,84,86,89,90
20.06 3 3btiA BER Rep, Mult 42,45,46,49,69,92,95
30.05 2 1bjyB CTC Rep, Mult 150,154,157
40.04 2 5f08A 5TG Rep, Mult 47,65,66,70,73,92,95,98,119,122,126,157
50.04 2 1qpiA QNA Rep, Mult 125,152,153,156
60.02 1 2oigD 523 Rep, Mult 125,129
70.02 1 2j8rB AZI Rep, Mult 130,146
80.02 1 2whkA CA Rep, Mult 81,123
90.02 1 3btjB DEQ Rep, Mult 74,77,126,127
100.02 1 1jumA BER Rep, Mult 42,43,46,92,95,122
110.02 1 1jusA RHQ Rep, Mult 39,43,46,49,74,80,83,95,126,127
120.02 1 2zozA ET Rep, Mult 130,131
130.02 1 1y10C CA Rep, Mult 139,140
140.02 1 3aqtA RCO Rep, Mult 50,66,69,70,73,98,99,103
150.02 1 3pg9A AZI Rep, Mult 97,152
160.02 1 1xrrA PRO Rep, Mult 95,99,127,132,133

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602r0nA0.5264.390.0660.8061.3.99.770
20.0601kwgA0.5024.330.0430.7623.2.1.23NA
30.0603gpbA0.5193.940.0920.7692.4.1.168
40.0602ix6E0.5034.590.0500.8061.3.3.6NA
50.0603ii9C0.5164.400.0790.8001.3.99.7125
60.0601e1yA0.5284.110.0920.7752.4.1.1NA
70.0602ix6A0.5044.660.0430.8121.3.3.6151
80.0601t9gC0.4904.500.0570.8001.3.99.3117,158
90.0601hbmA0.4984.230.0490.7382.8.4.1NA
100.0603djlA0.5424.270.0570.8121.3.99.-NA
110.0602p8uA0.5014.560.0670.8002.3.3.1088
120.0602azdB0.5463.810.0800.8002.4.1.185
130.0601bxnE0.3275.980.0320.6624.1.1.3938
140.0602nvrA0.4475.130.0590.8063.5.1.98158
150.0601siqA0.5274.230.0670.7941.3.99.7NA
160.0602v4wD0.5064.710.0590.8192.3.3.10NA
170.0601rboB0.5003.700.0800.7064.1.1.39NA
180.0602c4mC0.5453.830.0770.7812.4.1.1NA
190.0601rblA0.5003.750.0880.7134.1.1.39NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.230.7213.020.130.943bniA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
10.220.7003.290.090.933whcA GO:0003677 GO:0005737 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0016042
20.210.6493.860.070.942id6A GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
30.210.6283.990.090.963bhqA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
40.200.6753.250.090.922qibA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
50.190.6813.650.140.963bqyA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892 GO:0046677
60.190.6713.770.130.954auxA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
70.180.6703.700.090.933b6aA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892 GO:0046677
80.180.6393.650.130.893htaA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
90.180.6513.730.120.923lhqA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
100.140.7053.130.140.923bjbB GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
110.140.6933.040.110.913mnlA GO:0000976 GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005829 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0042803
120.130.7123.640.090.952hxoA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892
130.130.6813.540.110.943c07A GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
140.110.6693.820.120.962vprA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045892 GO:0046677 GO:0046872
150.100.6293.820.110.913p9tA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
160.100.6483.580.110.912genA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
170.090.6323.500.100.905d1wD GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
180.090.6493.810.070.922hyjA GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003677 GO:0001071
GO-Score 0.70 0.40
Biological Processes GO:0006355 GO:0044255 GO:0044712 GO:0032787 GO:1901575
GO-Score 0.70 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44
Cellular Component GO:0044424
GO-Score 0.44

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.