[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3159c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 1 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.11 6 2z8xA CA Rep, Mult 393,394,395,398,412,413,414,418
20.04 2 1hurB GDP Rep, Mult 310,312
30.04 2 3fofC NUC Rep, Mult 220,222
40.04 2 3blqA MG Rep, Mult 301,314
50.02 1 3huzP MG Rep, Mult 496,498
60.02 1 4ue5D NUC Rep, Mult 228,229,230
70.02 1 2quaA CA Rep, Mult 460,463,464,465,468,482,483,484,491
80.02 1 2z66A UUU Rep, Mult 326,328,346,348,369
90.02 1 4qqfC MG Rep, Mult 230,232
100.02 1 3cigA UUU Rep, Mult 339,358,360,361,378
110.02 1 2izzA NAD Rep, Mult 226,227
120.02 1 3a79B III Rep, Mult 449,450,451,454
130.02 1 3ciyA UUU Rep, Mult 182,281,327,328,347
140.02 1 2z66B UUU Rep, Mult 359,376,378,380,406,408,428
150.02 1 1o0tA CA Rep, Mult 413,414,415,418,432,434,438
160.02 1 2z64A UUU Rep, Mult 274,289,291,293,338
170.02 1 1ct8B TAA Rep, Mult 301,303
180.02 1 3bbxL MG Rep, Mult 502,503

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601ogmX0.3775.420.0540.4853.2.1.11NA
20.0602z8gB0.3745.370.0570.4813.2.1.57356
30.0601dboA0.4104.620.0460.5074.2.2.19352
40.0601nhcA0.3664.520.0760.4463.2.1.15NA
50.0602o1dA0.3204.430.0290.3814.2.2.2288
60.0603c5wA0.2175.770.0810.2953.1.3.16396,453,458
70.0603btaA0.3438.200.0440.5853.4.24.69NA
80.0602np0A0.3458.020.0390.5783.4.24.69NA
90.0601z0hB0.1827.370.0050.2833.4.24.69NA
100.0602vuaA0.1857.180.0260.2833.4.24.69NA
110.0601vblA0.3215.470.0530.4154.2.2.2NA
120.0602fhbA0.3458.030.0590.5763.2.1.41NA
130.0601ru4A0.3824.480.1020.4594.2.2.2NA
140.0603h09B0.6284.260.1010.7363.4.21.72NA
150.0602vdcA0.3328.080.0280.5591.4.1.13NA
160.0602fhcA0.3517.800.0570.5753.2.1.41286
170.0602uveA0.4075.480.0600.5343.2.1.82334
180.0601k5cA0.3574.470.0760.4373.2.1.15399
190.0603jurD0.3924.570.0840.4753.2.1.15NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.210.8693.560.120.974om9A GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
10.190.8423.850.080.963szeA GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
20.140.7634.440.090.913ak5A GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
30.140.7624.280.090.911wxrA GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
40.120.5444.890.070.681dabA GO:0005576 GO:0007155 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0019867 GO:0042597
50.070.5795.380.080.763syjA GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0007155 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0019867 GO:0042597 GO:0042802
60.070.6284.260.100.743h09B GO:0004175 GO:0004252 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0009279 GO:0009405 GO:0009986 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0042597
70.060.2137.460.050.341zjkA GO:0001855 GO:0001867 GO:0002376 GO:0004252 GO:0005509 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0006956 GO:0006958 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0016787 GO:0045087 GO:0046872 GO:0048306 GO:0070062
80.060.2087.600.030.334kkdB GO:0001867 GO:0002376 GO:0004252 GO:0005509 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0006508 GO:0006898 GO:0006956 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0016787 GO:0042803 GO:0045087 GO:0045916 GO:0046872 GO:0048306
90.060.2036.950.040.311w62A GO:0005576 GO:0005737 GO:0007275 GO:0016020 GO:0016853 GO:0018112
100.060.2117.290.030.331gpzA GO:0002376 GO:0004252 GO:0005509 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0006955 GO:0006956 GO:0006958 GO:0008233 GO:0008236 GO:0016787 GO:0045087 GO:0070062 GO:0072562
110.060.1967.190.040.303h2zA GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008926 GO:0016491 GO:0019594 GO:0050662 GO:0055114
120.060.1926.830.020.282qkdA GO:0000226 GO:0001833 GO:0001834 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0006397 GO:0007275 GO:0008270 GO:0008380 GO:0010628 GO:0015030 GO:0021510 GO:0030154 GO:0030424 GO:0030426 GO:0030576 GO:0030971 GO:0031369 GO:0031641 GO:0032797 GO:0033120 GO:0042023 GO:0042307 GO:0042995 GO:0043025 GO:0043204 GO:0045927 GO:0046872 GO:0048471 GO:0061564 GO:0071364 GO:0071931 GO:0097504 GO:1902742 GO:1990261 GO:2000672
130.060.1856.920.040.284f7kA GO:0005507 GO:0016491 GO:0052716 GO:0055114
140.060.1775.650.060.241tiaA GO:0006629 GO:0016042 GO:0016787
150.060.1715.870.030.233bliA GO:0003824 GO:0003852 GO:0008652 GO:0009082 GO:0009098 GO:0016740 GO:0019752 GO:0046872 GO:0046912
160.060.1636.840.050.245it9g GO:0000747 GO:0001403 GO:0001965 GO:0004871 GO:0005080 GO:0005092 GO:0005737 GO:0007186 GO:0010255 GO:0017148 GO:0022627 GO:0031139 GO:0031954 GO:0032995 GO:0034613 GO:0035556 GO:0043022 GO:0050790 GO:0060733
170.060.1625.510.060.221h8vA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008810 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
180.060.1487.200.020.233he3A GO:0000166 GO:0008767


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004252
GO-Score 0.53
Biological Processes GO:0009405 GO:0006508
GO-Score 0.59 0.53
Cellular Component GO:0009279 GO:0005576 GO:0042597 GO:0016021 GO:0009986
GO-Score 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.