[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3136A

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 5 4f8hB LMD Rep, Mult 12,13,16
20.06 3 2zc6D III Rep, Mult 11,36,37,38,39,41,42,43,44,46
30.04 2 3i2bA MG Rep, Mult 20,92
40.04 2 2h6bA 3C4 Rep, Mult 11,14
50.04 2 1uwcA FER Rep, Mult 94,99
60.02 1 2ogfB OXG Rep, Mult 10,13,44
70.02 1 1o7lD CA Rep, Mult 47,51,53
80.02 1 1d7bA HEM Rep, Mult 44,47
90.02 1 2hrgA CA Rep, Mult 34,64
100.02 1 1htwA MG Rep, Mult 41,47
110.02 1 3rbxC CA Rep, Mult 77,82
120.02 1 1smyF MG Rep, Mult 15,90,91
130.02 1 3zweA FUC Rep, Mult 92,100
140.02 1 1vf5C III Rep, Mult 19,23
150.02 1 1uynX CXE Rep, Mult 55,57,59,72,74
160.02 1 3zw2B UUU Rep, Mult 82,84,92,100

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603mr1A0.4943.790.0670.7733.4.11.18NA
20.0601kp0A0.5034.320.0810.8463.5.3.3NA
30.0601jawA0.5114.120.0630.8183.4.11.9NA
40.0602gk9B0.4914.010.0960.7542.7.1.149,2.7.1.68NA
50.0602oknA0.4994.270.0710.8363.4.13.9NA
60.0602p3nA0.5124.200.0970.8643.1.3.25NA
70.0601pv9B0.4973.870.0440.7823.4.13.9NA
80.0601bo1A0.5033.670.0580.7462.7.1.149NA
90.0601dt5C0.5033.980.0650.8093.1.1.331,71
100.0602dfiA0.4964.210.0630.8183.4.11.18NA
110.0603b9jJ0.3984.580.0090.7181.17.1.4,1.17.3.2NA
120.0602q4iC0.4963.960.0610.8005.3.99.657
130.0604matA0.5043.720.0790.7733.4.11.18NA
140.0603hriA0.4994.340.0420.8646.1.1.21NA
150.0601rp5A0.5064.690.1020.9273.4.-.-NA
160.0602e1qA0.3924.310.0280.6731.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
170.0601m0wA0.4944.250.0180.8186.3.2.3NA
180.0601fo4A0.3954.390.0090.6821.17.1.4NA
190.0602v2fF0.4834.580.0670.9003.4.16.416

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.080.6213.460.110.893kvnX GO:0006629 GO:0008610 GO:0009247 GO:0009279 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016298 GO:0016787 GO:0016788 GO:0042710 GO:0044010 GO:0048870 GO:0052689 GO:0071973 GO:0071978
10.070.6143.620.080.891uynX GO:0004252 GO:0006508
20.070.5703.380.120.813ci0K GO:0005886 GO:0006810 GO:0009306 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0046872
30.070.4584.440.040.803q6dA GO:0006508 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0046872 GO:0102009
40.070.4714.200.130.792zsgA GO:0004177 GO:0006508 GO:0016787 GO:0046872
50.070.4874.040.080.782howA GO:0016787
60.070.4804.400.070.863pgrA GO:0006810 GO:0006869 GO:0009279 GO:0015483 GO:0015718 GO:0015909 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0022834 GO:0055085
70.070.5303.990.060.875e5bA GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005694 GO:0006260 GO:0006281 GO:0006337 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006366 GO:0006368 GO:0006974 GO:0032786 GO:0044822 GO:1901796
80.070.4924.210.060.844fkcA GO:0004177 GO:0006508 GO:0016787 GO:0046872
90.060.4153.090.050.581tbuB GO:0005777 GO:0006635 GO:0006637 GO:0016290 GO:0016787 GO:0019395 GO:0047617 GO:0052689
100.060.4084.620.010.764kwyA GO:0019867 GO:0043165
110.060.4983.820.060.781pv9A GO:0005737 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0016787 GO:0016805 GO:0046872 GO:0102009
120.060.4004.210.040.701a0kA GO:0003779 GO:0003785 GO:0005618 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0005819 GO:0005829 GO:0005856 GO:0005886 GO:0005938 GO:0008154 GO:0009506 GO:0009524 GO:0009826 GO:0010229 GO:0015629 GO:0042989 GO:0048046 GO:0048366 GO:0048527
130.060.3863.520.050.593i2nA GO:0006915 GO:0043130
140.060.4804.380.060.883cb5A GO:0000790 GO:0005634 GO:0005694 GO:0006260 GO:0006281 GO:0006334 GO:0006338 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006368 GO:0006974 GO:0034724 GO:0035101 GO:0043486 GO:0044732
150.060.5524.220.010.913bitA GO:0000790 GO:0003682 GO:0005634 GO:0005658 GO:0005694 GO:0006260 GO:0006261 GO:0006281 GO:0006334 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006368 GO:0006974 GO:0008023 GO:0031298 GO:0031491 GO:0034724 GO:0035101 GO:0042393 GO:0045899 GO:0060261
160.060.4714.380.040.803l24B GO:0004063 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008235 GO:0008237 GO:0009636 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016795 GO:0016805 GO:0046872 GO:0047862 GO:0102009
170.060.3164.890.050.573lh4A GO:0004869 GO:0005576 GO:0010466 GO:0030414 GO:2000117
180.060.3874.630.050.733fcxB GO:0005737 GO:0005788 GO:0016023 GO:0016787 GO:0016788 GO:0018738 GO:0031410 GO:0046294 GO:0047374 GO:0052689 GO:0070062 GO:1901687


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043169
GO-Score 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0019538
GO-Score 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0016021 GO:0009279 GO:0005886
GO-Score 0.14 0.08 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.