[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3098c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.06 3 4lk3E POP Rep, Mult 53,147
20.06 3 5k4lA III Rep, Mult 56,59,60
30.04 2 2i7hB FMN Rep, Mult 16,17,18,89
40.04 2 4r8hA SP1 Rep, Mult 92,93,96
50.04 2 3wu2h CLA Rep, Mult 54,58
60.04 2 1i94C WO2 Rep, Mult 51,53
70.02 1 1p4rB 354 Rep, Mult 5,67,70
80.02 1 1cc1L SF4 Rep, Mult 37,141
90.02 1 1jdtB MTA Rep, Mult 18,37
100.02 1 1k7lC III Rep, Mult 10,26,33,104
110.02 1 1k7lC III Rep, Mult 90,116,117,118,120
120.02 1 1thzA 326 Rep, Mult 55,127,133
130.02 1 3cf2B ADP Rep, Mult 78,147
140.02 1 4fmaE MG Rep, Mult 26,28
150.02 1 2ohjE FMN Rep, Mult 19,141
160.02 1 2axtM UNK Rep, Mult 118,123,146
170.02 1 2ypaA NUC Rep, Mult 59,60,63

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602wuzA0.4574.590.0500.7531.14.13.7021,49
20.0602w0aA0.3365.250.0280.6131.14.13.70NA
30.0602wz1A0.4475.040.0810.8074.6.1.2NA
40.0603bxvA0.4535.140.0520.8331.13.11.5524
50.0601fx2A0.4374.830.0800.7474.6.1.1NA
60.0603ciaA0.4405.070.0710.7803.4.11.-NA
70.0601af2A0.4394.650.0960.7533.5.4.5NA
80.0601s46A0.4544.530.0920.7472.4.1.4113
90.0602c6fA0.4435.110.0380.7873.4.15.125
100.0601g5aA0.4514.560.1020.7472.4.1.4NA
110.0601u3rA0.3244.630.0290.5402.3.1.48NA
120.0601r7aA0.4384.870.0650.7472.4.1.7NA
130.0602ve3A0.4664.630.0670.7601.14.-.-NA
140.0603dbmA0.3625.410.0420.6804.2.1.92NA
150.0601cjkB0.4674.940.0730.8074.6.1.1NA
160.0603ig5A0.4574.680.0620.7676.3.2.2NA
170.0602vxoB0.4384.720.0640.7336.3.5.2NA
180.0603hvlB0.4554.430.0480.7272.3.1.4854,135
190.0601cttA0.4404.630.0960.7533.5.4.537

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.5334.170.080.804ewvB GO:0006952 GO:0009626 GO:0010112 GO:0016874 GO:0034052 GO:0044419
10.070.5344.340.070.814epmA GO:0006952 GO:0009626 GO:0010112 GO:0016874 GO:0034052 GO:0044419
20.070.5104.170.060.774eplA GO:0002376 GO:0005737 GO:0006952 GO:0009611 GO:0009694 GO:0009864 GO:0010046 GO:0010224 GO:0016874 GO:0019899 GO:0045087 GO:0071365 GO:0080123 GO:2000030
30.060.3505.500.050.674avnA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245 GO:0030246 GO:0030247 GO:0046872
40.060.3445.260.070.634zemA GO:0003743 GO:0006413 GO:0044237
50.060.3685.390.020.681a0cA GO:0000287 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0006098 GO:0009045 GO:0016853 GO:0042732 GO:0046872
60.060.4185.000.040.733r31A GO:0008152 GO:0008802 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0019285 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
70.060.3595.230.040.665dxfB GO:0003824 GO:0004805 GO:0005992 GO:0009267 GO:0009405 GO:0016311 GO:0030447 GO:0034599 GO:0034605 GO:0036170 GO:0060257 GO:0071470
80.060.3305.350.100.595dboB GO:0003743 GO:0006413 GO:0044237
90.060.3245.240.030.552yv5A GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0016787 GO:0046872
100.060.2885.420.060.542g7sA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
110.060.3615.670.030.724nguA GO:0006810 GO:0030288
120.060.3123.810.100.453lxjA GO:0000166 GO:0003682 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0016887 GO:0031936 GO:0045944 GO:0070577
130.060.3225.130.040.581pbuA GO:0003746 GO:0004364 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005783 GO:0005829 GO:0005913 GO:0006412 GO:0006414 GO:0006749 GO:0009615 GO:0016020 GO:0070062 GO:0098609 GO:0098641
140.060.3464.540.070.541tq6A GO:0000166 GO:0002376 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0005794 GO:0010506 GO:0016020 GO:0016787 GO:0019003 GO:0019221 GO:0020005 GO:0031965 GO:0032580 GO:0035458 GO:0042802 GO:0042832 GO:0045087 GO:0050829
150.060.2853.870.060.441y3jA GO:0000166 GO:0001568 GO:0001701 GO:0001974 GO:0002082 GO:0004008 GO:0005375 GO:0005507 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005770 GO:0005783 GO:0005794 GO:0005802 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0006568 GO:0006584 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0006812 GO:0006825 GO:0006878 GO:0007005 GO:0007595 GO:0007626 GO:0010041 GO:0010043 GO:0010273 GO:0015677 GO:0015679 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016323 GO:0016532 GO:0016787 GO:0018205 GO:0019430 GO:0019829 GO:0021702 GO:0021860 GO:0021954 GO:0030001 GO:0030140 GO:0030141 GO:0030198 GO:0030199 GO:0031069 GO:0031526 GO:0032767 GO:0034220 GO:0042093 GO:0042414 GO:0042415 GO:0042417 GO:0042428 GO:0043005 GO:0043025 GO:0043085 GO:0043086 GO:0043473 GO:0043588 GO:0046688 GO:0046872 GO:0048251 GO:0048286 GO:0048471 GO:0048812 GO:0051216 GO:0051353 GO:0051542 GO:0060003
160.060.3195.640.060.613mxtA GO:0000166 GO:0004592 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0015940 GO:0016874
170.060.2694.880.090.452rgnB GO:0005085 GO:0005089 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0016020 GO:0030016 GO:0030017 GO:0035023 GO:0043547
180.060.3645.100.030.631bqgA GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008872 GO:0016829 GO:0019394 GO:0042838 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0019899 GO:0080123 GO:0003743 GO:0046872 GO:0030247 GO:0004553
GO-Score 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
Biological Processes GO:0006950
GO-Score 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.