[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3091

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 5 2o013 CLA Rep, Mult 320,323
20.05 3 1f59B III Rep, Mult 180,195,231,232,233,234,237,238
30.04 2 3zxsA MG Rep, Mult 346,471
40.04 2 4n6fB CA Rep, Mult 291,294
50.04 2 1cqpB MG Rep, Mult 213,214,346
60.02 1 2ly0A A2Y Rep, Mult 543,546
70.02 1 2qejC CA Rep, Mult 286,287
80.02 1 1f59A III Rep, Mult 190,193,194,197,198,237,246
90.02 1 2z64A UUU Rep, Mult 330,363,365,368
100.02 1 2z66A UUU Rep, Mult 287,291,322
110.02 1 3wmoS BCL Rep, Mult 492,503
120.02 1 3m59A CO Rep, Mult 236,237
130.02 1 1rkuB MG Rep, Mult 184,346
140.02 1 1o6pA III Rep, Mult 317,320,321,356,357,360,361
150.02 1 2iubF MG Rep, Mult 332,421
160.02 1 3dm1A III Rep, Mult 220,221
170.02 1 3i8hG MG Rep, Mult 368,371
180.02 1 3ibsA MG Rep, Mult 214,221
190.02 1 3ouwA III Rep, Mult 262,317,324,360,361,364,367,368,371,398,400,403,404,453,457

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603btaA0.3538.100.0360.5993.4.24.69NA
20.0601fo4A0.2918.030.0500.4921.17.1.4NA
30.0601slyA0.3856.630.0580.5724.2.2.-316
40.0603b9jI0.1335.590.0350.1791.17.1.4,1.17.3.2262
50.0603b9jJ0.2226.610.0530.3321.17.1.4,1.17.3.2NA
60.0602vuaA0.2097.580.0310.3413.4.24.69314,320
70.0603c5wA0.3094.500.0600.3823.1.3.16NA
80.0603ihyC0.3457.440.0440.5452.7.1.137NA
90.0601ho8A0.3655.010.0430.4693.6.3.14292
100.0602x6fA0.3457.630.0560.5592.7.1.137,2.7.1.153,2.7.1.154211,216,218,239,242
110.0602e1qA0.3127.850.0320.5061.17.3.2,1.17.1.4NA
120.0603ebgA0.3936.440.0460.5683.4.11.-NA
130.0603dsxA0.3196.120.0570.4532.5.1.60NA
140.0602ckjA0.3397.770.0630.5471.17.1.4,1.17.3.2NA
150.0601d8dA0.3516.020.0420.4922.5.1.58NA
160.0602vdcF0.3547.970.0340.5921.4.1.13260
170.0601hn0A0.4167.810.0440.6914.2.2.20209
180.0602gv9B0.3507.290.0470.5432.7.7.7NA
190.0601dceA0.4077.310.0590.6482.5.1.60NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.150.7684.760.090.954ol0B GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006810 GO:0008139 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0031965 GO:0035048 GO:0042802 GO:0043231
10.130.7485.070.070.943zjyE GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006606 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0008139 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0031965
20.120.7165.150.070.924c0qA GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006810 GO:0008139 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0031965 GO:0035048 GO:0042802 GO:0043231
30.110.7055.170.070.912x1gF GO:0005737 GO:0006606 GO:0006886 GO:0007270 GO:0008139 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0031965 GO:0042331 GO:0050804
40.100.6845.830.070.933zkvA GO:0005737 GO:0006606 GO:0006886 GO:0007270 GO:0008139 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0031965 GO:0042331 GO:0050804
50.080.6615.480.060.875difC GO:0000055 GO:0000776 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005816 GO:0006406 GO:0006611 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0034501 GO:0048471
60.070.6796.140.050.942xwuB GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006606 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0008139 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0031965
70.070.6005.640.060.804c0qB GO:0004872 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006810 GO:0008139 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0031965 GO:0035048 GO:0042802 GO:0043231
80.070.7035.800.060.953wyfC GO:0000055 GO:0000776 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005816 GO:0006406 GO:0006611 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0034501 GO:0048471
90.070.6305.940.060.872q5dB GO:0000059 GO:0000060 GO:0005634 GO:0005635 GO:0005643 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006309 GO:0006606 GO:0006607 GO:0006610 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0007079 GO:0007080 GO:0008139 GO:0008270 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016032 GO:0019054 GO:0019899 GO:0019904 GO:0030953 GO:0031291 GO:0031965 GO:0034399 GO:0040001 GO:0043234 GO:0044822 GO:0045184 GO:0051879 GO:0070062 GO:0071782 GO:0075733 GO:0090307
100.060.3787.630.050.622iw3B GO:0000166 GO:0001933 GO:0003723 GO:0003746 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005840 GO:0006412 GO:0006414 GO:0006415 GO:0006469 GO:0010494 GO:0016887 GO:0019843 GO:0022626 GO:0042788
110.060.2627.770.060.442hivA GO:0000166 GO:0003677 GO:0003909 GO:0003910 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006260 GO:0006273 GO:0006281 GO:0006310 GO:0006974 GO:0007049 GO:0016874 GO:0046872 GO:0051103 GO:0051301 GO:0071897
120.060.2586.720.030.393a5vA
130.060.2087.540.030.341x87A GO:0005737 GO:0006547 GO:0006548 GO:0016153 GO:0016829 GO:0019556 GO:0019557
140.060.1875.640.050.255bmwB GO:0003824 GO:0004807 GO:0006094 GO:0006096 GO:0006098 GO:0008152 GO:0016853 GO:0042802
150.060.1586.200.060.222yn3C GO:0005509 GO:0007156 GO:0016020 GO:0016491 GO:0030151 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
160.060.1816.240.040.262gieA GO:0003677 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0009036 GO:0009307 GO:0016787 GO:0090305
170.060.2116.240.040.304rk9A GO:0005215 GO:0006810
180.060.1505.790.040.201ks4A GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008810 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
190.060.1845.870.080.262htmC GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0009228 GO:0009229 GO:0016740 GO:0016783


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0060089 GO:0008139 GO:0008565 GO:0008536
GO-Score 0.50 0.48 0.48 0.31
Biological Processes GO:0010646 GO:0007268 GO:0023051 GO:0009453 GO:0009416 GO:0006606
GO-Score 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.31
Cellular Component GO:0005737 GO:0031965
GO-Score 0.48 0.48

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.