[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3067

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 7 1xn0A ROL Rep, Mult 105,113,114,117,118,121
20.06 4 1y2bB DEE Rep, Mult 65,74,80,99,102
30.04 3 1mz9B VDY Rep, Mult 114,117,121
40.04 3 3g58A 988 Rep, Mult 71,78,81,85
50.04 3 3fa4A MG Rep, Mult 56,58
60.03 2 4x23P III Rep, Mult 119,122
70.03 2 2e75E OPC Rep, Mult 112,113,116,117
80.03 2 1y66B DIO Rep, Mult 121,124,128
90.01 1 1s5ld CLA Rep, Mult 102,125
100.01 1 1q9mC ROL Rep, Mult 79,82,83,97
110.01 1 1m32A PLP Rep, Mult 72,73
120.01 1 3eerA ZN Rep, Mult 86,125,126
130.01 1 1xrmA III Rep, Mult 99,102
140.01 1 3lezA CA Rep, Mult 56,76
150.01 1 2qykA NPV Rep, Mult 82,86,93
160.01 1 4ecgA CA Rep, Mult 106,111

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601e6yA0.4854.560.0580.8312.8.4.199
20.0601w27A0.5254.810.0320.8974.3.1.24NA
30.0601iv8A0.4904.480.0400.7795.4.99.1576
40.0601mc0A0.3744.930.0650.6693.1.4.1757
50.0601tazA0.4774.860.0440.8463.1.4.17NA
60.0602ouyA0.4884.760.0660.8533.1.4.17NA
70.0601t2eA0.4793.420.0320.6841.1.1.277
80.0602o48X0.4933.950.0540.7501.1.1.179,1.3.1.20NA
90.0602r72A0.4774.510.0830.8012.7.7.48NA
100.0601b8fA0.5064.450.0320.8244.3.1.3NA
110.0601zklA0.4834.730.0760.8463.1.4.1725
120.0602qykB0.5164.580.0600.8243.1.4.17NA
130.0601q11A0.4894.340.0380.8096.1.1.197
140.0601e6vA0.4755.160.0390.8682.8.4.1NA
150.0601lldB0.4743.740.0840.6911.1.1.2711,101
160.0602nyfA0.5444.150.0840.8464.3.1.5NA
170.0602ohyB0.5174.420.0250.8465.4.3.6NA
180.0603czoB0.4554.980.0600.8244.3.1.3NA
190.0603ecnB0.4804.820.0520.8383.1.4.1734,124

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.130.7392.730.160.965ed7A GO:0019012 GO:0019033 GO:0030430 GO:0042025
10.070.4354.760.020.743mkmA GO:0005509 GO:0006206 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0016799 GO:0046133 GO:0046872 GO:0050263
20.060.5254.810.030.901w27A GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0006559 GO:0009698 GO:0009800 GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0045548
30.060.3785.460.040.761y2mB GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0006559 GO:0009698 GO:0009800 GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0045548 GO:0052883
40.060.5444.150.080.852nyfA GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0009072 GO:0009698 GO:0009699 GO:0009800 GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0045548 GO:0051289
50.060.5224.210.070.844v2rB GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0006558 GO:0006559 GO:0009698 GO:0009800 GO:0009820 GO:0009821 GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0016853 GO:0016869 GO:0042617 GO:0045548 GO:0051289
60.060.3764.820.060.653ojcA GO:0006520 GO:0006807 GO:0008152 GO:0009252 GO:0016853 GO:0016855 GO:0036361 GO:0046872 GO:0047661 GO:0047689
70.060.3105.020.030.523nojA GO:0008948 GO:0016829 GO:0046872 GO:0047443
80.060.4865.000.050.861gk2A GO:0003824 GO:0004397 GO:0005737 GO:0006547 GO:0006548 GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0019556 GO:0019557
90.060.4434.550.060.762qb6A GO:0004309 GO:0005737 GO:0005759 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006798 GO:0016462 GO:0016787 GO:0046872
100.060.3725.270.070.652x79A GO:0005215 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0055085
110.060.4614.260.070.743unvA GO:0003824
120.060.3415.280.080.624bhhF GO:0003723 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019013 GO:0019028 GO:0019029 GO:0039657
130.060.4954.340.070.794c6gB GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0006558 GO:0006559 GO:0009698 GO:0009800 GO:0009820 GO:0009821 GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0016853 GO:0016869 GO:0042617 GO:0045548 GO:0051289
140.060.3215.090.070.591ef9A GO:0003824 GO:0004300 GO:0004492 GO:0005829 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016829 GO:0016831
150.060.3923.350.050.563nz4B GO:0003824 GO:0005737 GO:0006558 GO:0006559 GO:0009698 GO:0009800 GO:0009820 GO:0009821 GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0016853 GO:0016869 GO:0042617 GO:0045548 GO:0051289
160.060.4095.200.030.783kdyA GO:0003824 GO:0009403 GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0016853 GO:0017000 GO:0050368 GO:0052883
170.060.3545.120.090.643zizA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0016985
180.060.3945.410.040.762o6yA GO:0003824 GO:0006572 GO:0009698 GO:0009699 GO:0016829 GO:0016841 GO:0042802 GO:0051289 GO:0052883


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016840
GO-Score 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0009803 GO:0009699 GO:0072330
GO-Score 0.36 0.36 0.36
Cellular Component GO:0044424
GO-Score 0.36

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.