[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3054c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 1 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.69 44 4c0xA FMN Rep, Mult 16,18,21,22,23,84,85,86,87,88,120,121,122,123
20.37 24 1x77A FMN Rep, Mult 52,54,99,102,103,140
30.02 3 3o73A O73 Rep, Mult 87,122,123,156,157
40.02 3 2vzfA PO4 Rep, Mult 16,18,21,22,23,84,155
50.01 1 1t0iA FMN Rep, Mult 59,99
60.01 1 3o2nB MZX Rep, Mult 88,93,133
70.01 1 3svlB CA Rep, Mult 17,18
80.01 1 3svlA CA Rep, Mult 53,55
90.01 1 1t0iA CA Rep, Mult 132,136

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.3531t0iA0.7602.770.2170.9021.5.1.2946,86,95,99,132
20.1641s2gB0.5634.200.0960.7832.4.2.674,76,113
30.1351cb7A0.5243.450.1240.7015.4.99.176,80,119
40.0991y80A0.5133.280.1290.6742.1.1.13NA
50.0671b1cA0.5923.940.1350.8151.6.2.416
60.0671m2oB0.5573.510.1070.7503.6.5.-131
70.0671s2dB0.5644.210.0960.7832.4.2.6NA
80.0661f8xA0.5393.640.1090.7072.4.2.6NA
90.0661bdjA0.4873.750.1200.6742.7.13.3141
100.0663lwzA0.5053.550.1260.6904.2.1.10139
110.0661h0rA0.4983.600.1190.6854.2.1.10NA
120.0662r25B0.4813.670.0720.6682.7.13.3NA
130.0661d0iH0.5214.140.1540.7394.2.1.10NA
140.0601e0sA0.5853.640.0750.7883.6.1.47NA
150.0601qr2A0.7323.140.1720.9181.10.99.2,1.6.99.2119
160.0601ycfA0.6662.680.1780.7991.7.99.7NA
170.0602qx9B0.7293.190.1720.9181.10.99.250,89,95
180.0601eloA0.5913.310.0750.7773.6.5.3NA
190.0601ob2A0.6353.460.1280.8373.6.1.48NA
200.0601h65A0.6024.320.0730.8803.6.5.-NA
210.0601de0A0.6143.430.0860.8211.18.6.1NA
220.0601darA0.5873.460.0690.7833.6.5.3NA
230.0601fuiA0.5933.760.1450.8215.3.1.2528
240.0602z9dB0.7163.120.1660.9021.7.1.696,99
250.0601d4aA0.7363.120.1440.9181.6.5.2NA
260.0601etuA0.6263.550.1160.8423.6.5.3NA
270.0602ohhA0.6732.540.1790.7931.-.-.-NA
280.0601gy8C0.5834.120.0640.8265.1.3.2NA
290.0602rg1B0.6902.590.1750.8151.6.5.2NA
300.0601tllA0.6023.520.1120.7991.14.13.39NA
310.0601ja1A0.5873.990.1280.8151.6.2.4NA
320.0603fjoA0.5854.020.1400.8041.6.2.4NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.580.9340.900.330.964h6pA GO:0000166 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
10.540.9390.820.300.963svlB GO:0003955 GO:0005829 GO:0006805 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
20.530.8951.030.300.931rttA GO:0000166 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0052873 GO:0055114
30.460.8462.100.310.953u7rA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
40.410.8172.240.280.933fvwB GO:0016491 GO:0055114
50.400.8512.140.240.962q62D GO:0000166 GO:0010038 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0051289 GO:0052873 GO:0055114
60.390.8642.120.230.972fzvB GO:0000166 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0050446 GO:0051289 GO:0052873 GO:0055114
70.380.8071.840.210.893gfrD GO:0016491 GO:0042802 GO:0055114
80.370.7542.470.170.904ltdA GO:0000166 GO:0008752 GO:0016491 GO:0046306 GO:0055114
90.350.7602.770.220.901t0iA GO:0003955 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006915 GO:0008134 GO:0016491 GO:0034599 GO:0042994 GO:0052873 GO:0052874 GO:0055114
100.340.7782.400.140.914ptyD GO:0006974 GO:0008752 GO:0009970 GO:0016491 GO:0046306 GO:0051289 GO:0052873 GO:0055114
110.330.7672.610.170.913k1yA GO:0016491 GO:0055114
120.330.7792.450.160.924c76A GO:0016491 GO:0052873 GO:0055114
130.300.7233.080.220.903r6wA GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016661 GO:0055114
140.300.7273.020.180.901t5bA GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016661 GO:0055114
150.300.7262.940.180.904eseA GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016661 GO:0055114
160.290.7303.140.170.921tikA GO:0005829 GO:0006979 GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016655 GO:0016661 GO:0050446 GO:0055114
170.270.7353.310.160.944fglD GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0007613 GO:0008753 GO:0009055 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070062
180.250.6903.000.160.873p0rA GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016661 GO:0055114
190.230.7153.190.160.923u7iB GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016661 GO:0055114
200.230.6963.130.170.893w78A GO:0000166 GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016661 GO:0055114
210.220.6903.250.150.884c0wA GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016661 GO:0055114
220.220.7252.440.140.842zkiA GO:0003955 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0045892 GO:0055114
230.220.6913.140.140.882hpvA GO:0008752 GO:0009055 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016652 GO:0016661 GO:0055114
240.190.5853.650.180.791bvyF GO:0003824 GO:0003958 GO:0004497 GO:0005506 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0010181 GO:0016491 GO:0016705 GO:0016712 GO:0020037 GO:0042802 GO:0046872 GO:0055114 GO:0070330


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0010181 GO:0003955 GO:0042803 GO:0052873
GO-Score 0.79 0.54 0.53 0.53
Biological Processes GO:0055114 GO:0006805
GO-Score 0.97 0.54
Cellular Component GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.54

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.