[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3040c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.52 16 2r5wB MG Rep, Mult 56,57,103,107
20.12 6 2a8sA GTP Rep, Mult 19,41,54,56,57,58,103,106,107,182,201,225,227,228,231
30.06 3 1g9qB APR Rep, Mult 14,17,43,56,57,58,103
40.02 1 2qjtB MN Rep, Mult 58,60,102,103
50.02 1 3i9x0 III Rep, Mult 15,16,59,61,96,168,170,172,179,181,183

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601ry2A0.3686.790.0380.6746.2.1.1NA
20.0602g3fA0.3736.020.0570.6113.5.2.7NA
30.0602a6tA0.4123.790.1380.5143.6.1.3016,60,97,103,106
40.0602pnyA0.4904.020.0960.6285.3.3.2109
50.0601f3yA0.3833.510.1770.4723.6.1.1715,58,103,107,185,201
60.0601yq2A0.3826.130.0660.6253.2.1.23103
70.0601qlaD0.3776.570.0130.6531.3.99.1167,182
80.0603kvnX0.3966.200.0690.6743.1.1.1162
90.0601hx3B0.4203.430.1220.5105.3.3.2NA
100.0601yq3A0.3735.900.0580.6111.3.5.1240
110.0602yvmA0.4183.430.1870.5173.6.1.-41,201
120.0603ezwG0.3715.990.0580.6082.7.1.30229
130.0601q33A0.4523.950.1240.5693.6.1.1356,60,103,106
140.0601xsbA0.4173.620.1180.5173.6.1.1796,107
150.0602q9pA0.3663.030.2330.4313.6.1.5258,103,107
160.0601thgA0.3806.300.0730.6563.1.1.3NA
170.0602dsbA0.4263.660.1230.5313.6.1.13NA
180.0601viqA0.4603.000.1220.5423.6.1.1317,103,106,109,204
190.0601jnrA0.3666.030.0610.6111.8.99.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.520.7171.760.260.773qsjA GO:0016787 GO:0046872
10.230.3963.230.180.483sonA GO:0016787
20.160.4363.320.150.523o61D GO:0000287 GO:0016787 GO:0016818 GO:0046872 GO:0052751
30.120.4283.230.180.515hzxA GO:0006281 GO:0008413 GO:0016787
40.100.4432.850.130.515bonA GO:0005829 GO:0006203 GO:0008413 GO:0016787 GO:0017110 GO:0034656 GO:0035539 GO:0046872
50.090.4073.490.120.503fk9A GO:0016787
60.080.3953.050.120.474kyxA GO:0016787
70.080.4033.010.160.472b0vA GO:0016787
80.070.4213.370.190.511su2A GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0016787
90.070.4082.930.170.483q91D GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0008768 GO:0016787 GO:0016818 GO:0018279 GO:0046872 GO:0047631 GO:0070062
100.070.4884.040.110.632i6kA GO:0000287 GO:0004452 GO:0005777 GO:0005829 GO:0006629 GO:0006694 GO:0006695 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008299 GO:0016126 GO:0016787 GO:0016853 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0050992
110.070.4904.020.100.632pnyA GO:0004452 GO:0005777 GO:0005829 GO:0006629 GO:0006694 GO:0006695 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008299 GO:0016126 GO:0016787 GO:0016853 GO:0046490 GO:0046872 GO:0050992
120.070.4583.020.130.541g9qA GO:0000287 GO:0005829 GO:0009408 GO:0016787 GO:0016818 GO:0019144 GO:0046872 GO:0047631
130.070.4443.860.120.551mqwA GO:0016787 GO:0030145 GO:0046872
140.060.4383.260.140.535c7qA GO:0016787 GO:0047631
150.060.4193.380.120.512b2kB GO:0004452 GO:0005737 GO:0006974 GO:0008299 GO:0016787 GO:0016853 GO:0046872 GO:0050992
160.060.3993.420.150.492fkbC GO:0005829 GO:0016787 GO:0016817 GO:0046872
170.060.4102.970.140.493hyqA GO:0004452 GO:0005737 GO:0008299 GO:0016787 GO:0016853 GO:0046872 GO:0050992
180.060.4053.940.140.521vhzA GO:0000287 GO:0005829 GO:0016787 GO:0019144 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0046872 GO:0047429
GO-Score 0.64 0.41
Biological Processes GO:0006281 GO:0034656 GO:0006203
GO-Score 0.12 0.10 0.10
Cellular Component GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.10

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.