[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3018A

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.14 688 2dysT CDL Rep, Mult 12,16,19,20,22,23,26,27
20.11 554 5ejiA POP Rep, Mult 11,12,13,14
30.11 573 4eoyA CA Rep, Mult 8,9,10,11,12,13
40.11 506 3bz1X CLA Rep, Mult 14,15,18,19
50.11 499 2wgmA NA Rep, Mult 21,22,24,26
60.10 525 1i94T MG Rep, Mult 12,13,14,15,16,17
70.04 227 2vbnB CA Rep, Mult 24,25,26,27
80.04 201 3lyaA RHE Rep, Mult 6,7,8,9
90.00 2 4z1mF ATP Rep, Mult 1,3,10
100.00 20 4utgA MG Rep, Mult 3,4,6,9,10
110.00 4 4p1eA IOD Rep, Mult 2,10,13

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.3033brvC0.7770.730.1600.8932.7.11.1012,20
20.2303brtA0.6940.530.1110.8212.7.11.1019
30.1893e7kH0.7471.770.1070.8932.7.11.1NA
40.1541vzjF0.5651.030.0000.7863.1.1.711
50.1452k9yA0.5800.820.1070.8212.7.10.19
60.1371qleD0.7081.850.0710.8931.9.3.116
70.1361rklA0.5072.130.1540.9292.4.1.11926
80.1351xtcC0.6791.460.1250.8572.4.2.3614
90.1311r7cA0.5351.700.0430.8213.6.1.15NA
100.1042jwaA0.7120.470.0360.8212.7.10.1NA
110.0811z8yN0.5540.940.1300.8213.4.21.90NA
120.0662o98P0.7401.390.1200.8573.6.3.616,24
130.0602b5uA0.8001.310.1850.9643.1.-.-NA
140.0601xzpA0.8060.850.0361.0003.6.5.-NA
150.0601uu1C0.7731.330.1110.9642.6.1.9NA
160.0602fuaA0.8051.130.1791.0004.1.2.17NA
170.0602a87A0.8031.520.2140.9641.8.1.9NA
180.0602f8jC0.7971.320.1110.9642.6.1.9NA
190.0601q6xA0.7611.260.1791.0002.3.1.6NA
200.0603fg0C0.7910.960.1480.9641.2.1.8NA
210.0603n2oA0.8090.950.1431.0004.1.1.19NA
220.0601sesA0.7531.260.2500.8936.1.1.1113
230.0602q8nB0.8071.460.2141.0005.3.1.9NA
240.0602fy3A0.7981.640.0361.0002.3.1.6NA
250.0602q8nC0.8061.460.2141.0005.3.1.9NA
260.0601serB0.7181.520.1071.0006.1.1.11NA
270.0603cxhR0.8000.810.0360.9641.10.2.23,7
280.0603i12A0.8081.140.0711.0006.3.2.4NA
290.0603o6cA0.8311.100.1431.0002.6.99.2NA
300.0602eabA0.7901.280.0361.0003.2.1.63NA
310.0601q0lA0.7222.010.1431.0001.1.1.2673

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.230.7961.140.041.002i80B GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
10.210.7481.200.040.963k3pB GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
20.190.8451.140.041.003tqtA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
30.190.8081.140.071.003i12A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
40.170.7472.410.000.965f5wA GO:0000166 GO:0004812 GO:0004820 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0006426 GO:0016874
50.160.7471.940.040.963fqdA GO:0003676 GO:0004518 GO:0004527 GO:0004534 GO:0005634 GO:0006139 GO:0006351 GO:0006353 GO:0006355 GO:0006364 GO:0006397 GO:0006402 GO:0016787 GO:0030846 GO:0090305 GO:0090503
60.150.7531.720.071.005iy6K GO:0000398 GO:0001055 GO:0003677 GO:0003899 GO:0005634 GO:0005654 GO:0005665 GO:0006283 GO:0006351 GO:0006366 GO:0006367 GO:0006368 GO:0006370 GO:0008543 GO:0010467 GO:0030275 GO:0031047 GO:0035019 GO:0042795 GO:0046983 GO:0050434
70.150.7371.610.000.963pieC GO:0000184 GO:0000932 GO:0000956 GO:0003676 GO:0003682 GO:0003723 GO:0004518 GO:0004527 GO:0004534 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0007089 GO:0008409 GO:0010494 GO:0016787 GO:0032968 GO:0046872 GO:0060261 GO:0070651 GO:0090503
80.150.7751.400.040.862x7rC GO:0002223 GO:0005198 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0019012 GO:0019031 GO:0019062 GO:0019064 GO:0019082 GO:0020002 GO:0030683 GO:0033644 GO:0039654 GO:0039663 GO:0044174 GO:0044175 GO:0046718 GO:0055036 GO:0075509 GO:0075512
90.140.7451.310.041.001ehiB GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
100.140.6811.710.150.894c5aA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
110.140.7711.840.071.005firA GO:0000738 GO:0003676 GO:0004518 GO:0004527 GO:0004534 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0006139 GO:0006351 GO:0006353 GO:0006355 GO:0006397 GO:0007275 GO:0008409 GO:0010587 GO:0016787 GO:0040028 GO:0040034 GO:0046872 GO:0060965 GO:0090503
120.130.7661.240.041.001ehiA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
130.130.7961.130.071.003rfcA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
140.130.6841.610.110.893lwbB GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0040007 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
150.130.7490.480.040.865bw9g GO:0000221 GO:0000329 GO:0006810 GO:0006811 GO:0007035 GO:0015992 GO:0042626 GO:0046961 GO:0055085 GO:1902600
160.130.6611.930.000.894s3kA GO:0004553 GO:0004568 GO:0005975 GO:0006032 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
170.120.7720.820.070.963pieD GO:0000184 GO:0000932 GO:0000956 GO:0003676 GO:0003682 GO:0003723 GO:0004518 GO:0004527 GO:0004534 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0007089 GO:0008409 GO:0010494 GO:0016787 GO:0032968 GO:0046872 GO:0060261 GO:0070651 GO:0090503
180.110.6262.020.070.932fb9A GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
190.110.6891.600.110.893lwbA GO:0000166 GO:0000287 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0008360 GO:0008716 GO:0009252 GO:0016874 GO:0030145 GO:0040007 GO:0046872 GO:0071555


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005524 GO:0000287 GO:0008716 GO:0030145 GO:0004812
GO-Score 0.67 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.35
Biological Processes GO:0071555 GO:0008360 GO:0009252 GO:0006418
GO-Score 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.35
Cellular Component GO:0044444
GO-Score 0.35

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.