[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3013

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 6 4dh9F NUC Rep, Mult 2,4,58,59,63,66,73,75,76,77,78
20.10 6 3l76B THR Rep, Mult 12,13,14,15,16,17,36,44
30.03 2 3l76A LYS Rep, Mult 17,19,20,21,35,36
40.03 2 1fa0A MN Rep, Mult 30,47
50.03 2 1t9wA NFN Rep, Mult 3,5,79,114,116,119
60.02 1 1y7pA RIP Rep, Mult 48,49,64
70.02 1 1y7pA RIP Rep, Mult 9,46,48,72
80.02 1 2eulD ZN Rep, Mult 202,205
90.02 1 1uf3A CA Rep, Mult 28,30
100.02 1 2raqA CA Rep, Mult 7,75
110.02 1 2f1f0 III Rep, Mult 14,17,18,21,25,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,45,117,159,160,162
120.02 1 3j5fF NUC Rep, Mult 2,4,54,76,77,78
130.02 1 1u8s0 III Rep, Mult 5,7,8,9,17,18,21,22,25,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,38,40,42,47,49,72,73,74,76,78,79,82,105,109
140.02 1 2p9gA SER Rep, Mult 30,31
150.02 1 4ey2B ZN Rep, Mult 111,164
160.02 1 3wc0A GTP Rep, Mult 5,77
170.02 1 1g42A CP2 Rep, Mult 42,47
180.02 1 3kssA CU1 Rep, Mult 91,134,136

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601yuyA0.4664.740.1300.6972.7.7.4875
20.0601n1eA0.4465.090.0820.6971.1.1.8NA
30.0602boaA0.4255.270.0790.6703.4.17.-NA
40.0601tehA0.4275.550.0530.7161.1.1.284,1.1.1.1NA
50.0601ea9C0.4335.670.0580.7293.2.1.54184
60.0602f1fA0.4424.090.1070.5832.2.1.636,72,117,118
70.0602pc6A0.4313.870.1250.5644.1.3.1834,36,118
80.0601p0cA0.4295.550.0730.7201.1.1.216,19
90.0601diiA0.4255.660.0380.7111.17.99.1NA
100.0601w6sC0.4235.990.0660.7711.1.99.8NA
110.0601qleA0.4355.690.0710.7291.9.3.1193
120.0601fftA0.4305.580.0780.7251.10.3.-NA
130.0601g72A0.4315.930.0370.7571.1.99.8NA
140.0601p0fA0.4305.560.0830.7251.1.1.2NA
150.0603k96A0.4365.170.0760.6831.1.1.9418
160.0601occA0.4415.750.0620.7431.9.3.1NA
170.0601qd1B0.5454.670.1040.7842.1.2.5,4.3.1.4NA
180.0601z82A0.4255.150.0430.6651.1.1.8NA
190.0602d0vA0.4395.930.0510.7841.1.99.8NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.250.5274.170.160.732nyiA GO:0008152 GO:0016597
10.140.5214.210.100.731u8sB GO:0006355
20.070.5304.520.120.745it0A GO:0000287 GO:0004647 GO:0006564 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0016311 GO:0016597 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0046872
30.060.3095.940.060.563n28A GO:0000287 GO:0004647 GO:0005737 GO:0006545 GO:0006564 GO:0008152 GO:0008652 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0046872
40.060.3136.090.020.551nrwA GO:0005737 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0044283 GO:0046872
50.060.3145.730.040.544lcjA GO:0000122 GO:0003682 GO:0003713 GO:0003714 GO:0005634 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0008152 GO:0008285 GO:0016032 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0017053 GO:0019079 GO:0030054 GO:0030154 GO:0035563 GO:0042803 GO:0042974 GO:0045202 GO:0045892 GO:0045944 GO:0048386 GO:0050872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:0097470
60.060.2926.560.070.574ezeA GO:0004647 GO:0006564 GO:0008152 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791
70.060.3192.510.110.371zpvC GO:0008152 GO:0016597
80.060.2876.020.050.523ga0A GO:0000122 GO:0003714 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0016746 GO:0017053 GO:0030154 GO:0042803 GO:0045892 GO:0050872 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:0061025
90.060.2845.660.060.483dnpA GO:0005737 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0044283
100.060.2836.450.050.554zevA GO:0005737 GO:0010323 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0044283 GO:0046872 GO:0050308
110.060.2966.140.050.543fzqA GO:0016787
120.060.2796.240.070.532rarA GO:0005737 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0044283 GO:0046872
130.060.2756.820.030.561rkqA GO:0000287 GO:0005829 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0044283 GO:0046872 GO:0050308
140.060.2776.760.050.563l7yA GO:0016787 GO:0046872
150.060.2656.360.080.493pgvA GO:0016787 GO:0046872
160.060.2446.190.040.461nf2A GO:0005737 GO:0016311 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0044283 GO:0046872
170.060.2616.590.060.512qyhB GO:0016787
180.060.2515.400.040.423e81A GO:0005829 GO:0008781 GO:0016311 GO:0016740 GO:0016779 GO:0016787 GO:0019143 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0031406 GO:0043169 GO:0042578
GO-Score 0.59 0.36 0.36
Biological Processes GO:0006796
GO-Score 0.36
Cellular Component GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.12

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.