[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3008

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.08 5 2i6aB 5I5 Rep, Mult 12,14,16,58,116,126
20.07 4 1kgzA MN Rep, Mult 50,199,200
30.05 3 1rk2B ADP Rep, Mult 8,59,62,66
40.05 3 1jb0M CLA Rep, Mult 167,171
50.03 2 1s2vB MG Rep, Mult 80,103
60.03 2 3lswA ZN Rep, Mult 88,92
70.03 2 3b1nA ADP Rep, Mult 4,34,58,61
80.02 1 2h1iB CA Rep, Mult 98,101
90.02 1 2e85B CA Rep, Mult 85,88
100.02 1 2bo6B MN Rep, Mult 21,23
110.02 1 2z8yM XE Rep, Mult 6,142,167,168,171
120.02 1 4awyB MG Rep, Mult 110,130
130.02 1 1t8sA FMP Rep, Mult 92,93
140.02 1 1un9A MG Rep, Mult 180,197,199
150.02 1 1uetA CA Rep, Mult 141,146
160.02 1 5erjA CPT Rep, Mult 70,157

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603hj6A0.4864.460.0880.7152.7.1.4129,188
20.0603b3lA0.5044.320.0550.7252.7.1.3NA
30.0602qcvA0.4964.530.0850.7492.7.1.9257
40.0603ie7A0.4774.980.0640.7682.7.1.-NA
50.0602nxfA0.4475.370.0890.7303.6.1.16,3.6.1.53,3.6.1.13NA
60.0601ua4A0.5045.010.0390.7872.7.1.147154
70.0601sqfA0.4615.430.0880.7632.1.1.-NA
80.0603ktnA0.4964.650.0430.7542.7.1.45NA
90.0601l2lA0.4834.960.0450.7632.7.1.14762
100.0602frxA0.4645.560.0440.7782.1.1.-NA
110.0603drwA0.4764.950.0580.7492.7.1.146115,188,190
120.0602hlzC0.5084.510.0880.7582.7.1.3NA
130.0601z45A0.4424.690.0580.6525.1.3.2,5.1.3.3NA
140.0603k9eB0.4834.630.0710.7442.7.1.-NA
150.0601vm7A0.4754.560.0740.7102.7.1.15NA
160.0602c49A0.4994.170.0490.7102.7.1.-NA
170.0601rpnC0.4544.490.1020.6524.2.1.47NA
180.0602v78A0.5134.550.0700.7682.7.1.459
190.0603e2dA0.4425.180.0610.7303.1.3.1124

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.180.5034.600.040.763ktnA GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
10.130.5074.420.060.741gqtB GO:0000166 GO:0004747 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0006014 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019303 GO:0046835 GO:0046872
20.100.4904.760.080.773in1A GO:0004747 GO:0006014 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046835
30.070.4954.690.100.754k8pA GO:0000166 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773
40.070.4844.790.100.773pl2A GO:0008865 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0046835
50.070.5054.640.080.772afbA GO:0008673 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0046835 GO:0046872
60.070.5064.450.080.761v19A GO:0000166 GO:0004747 GO:0005524 GO:0005975 GO:0006014 GO:0008673 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046835
70.070.4794.420.070.712nwhA GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773
80.070.4984.620.120.753uboA GO:0000166 GO:0008865 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046835
90.070.4874.780.040.752jg5A GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005975 GO:0005988 GO:0008662 GO:0009024 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0046835
100.070.5034.500.110.754e69B GO:0000166 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773
110.070.4924.730.080.743lhxA GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773
120.070.4994.620.090.772qcvA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019310 GO:0047590
130.070.4904.760.060.764n09A GO:0000166 GO:0004001 GO:0006166 GO:0006167 GO:0009152 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
140.070.4884.490.040.723b1nB GO:0000166 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773
150.070.4924.800.070.774gm6C GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
160.070.4874.900.070.793k9eB GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
170.070.4764.710.100.732rbcA GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
180.070.4754.560.070.711vm7A GO:0004747 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006014 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019303 GO:0046835


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0019200 GO:1901265 GO:0036094
GO-Score 0.44 0.37 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0044262 GO:0016310 GO:0019321
GO-Score 0.54 0.44 0.44
Cellular Component GO:0005829
GO-Score 0.13

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.