[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv3004

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.09 4 3wmm3 CRT Rep, Mult 11,15,18
20.05 2 4pe1A DCD Rep, Mult 28,31
30.05 2 4ni1A 2JX Rep, Mult 5,8,11,30
40.05 2 1otuA CL Rep, Mult 73,74,83,97
50.02 1 1j9lA CA Rep, Mult 62,64
60.02 1 1m4pA III Rep, Mult 62,65,70,71,86,108
70.02 1 3c2mA MN Rep, Mult 42,45
80.02 1 2o012 CLA Rep, Mult 35,39
90.02 1 2vjlA COA Rep, Mult 67,69
100.02 1 1llrD UUU Rep, Mult 56,58
110.02 1 2wsc4 CLA Rep, Mult 4,8
120.02 1 3v5uA MYS Rep, Mult 31,35,36
130.02 1 2wse1 CLA Rep, Mult 37,41
140.02 1 2h6bA 3C4 Rep, Mult 11,14
150.02 1 4z9vB III Rep, Mult 19,23,26,27,30
160.02 1 3wmnA CRT Rep, Mult 26,29,33,37

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601ug9A0.4754.440.0970.7863.2.1.70NA
20.0603edrC0.3345.140.0530.6613.4.22.60100
30.0601iduA0.4954.250.0710.8391.11.1.10NA
40.0601qtnB0.3183.940.0780.4823.4.22.61,3.4.22.-NA
50.0601i4eB0.4864.730.0950.8483.4.22.61NA
60.0601qleA0.4644.250.0570.8121.9.3.1NA
70.0603ebgA0.4804.460.0390.8303.4.11.-NA
80.0602gepA0.4874.030.0760.8041.8.1.281
90.0602d0gA0.4884.350.1160.8393.2.1.13554,72
100.0603edrA0.3375.070.0540.6523.4.22.60100
110.0601maaD0.4024.080.0250.6433.1.1.7NA
120.0601dioB0.4974.270.0950.8844.2.1.2835,44,96
130.0602uv8G0.5204.360.0480.8482.3.1.86NA
140.0602qljD0.3204.080.0910.4913.4.22.6017,23,31,37,72
150.0601izjA0.4884.320.1160.8393.2.1.135,3.2.1.1NA
160.0601mmfE0.5024.240.1050.8844.2.1.3052,63
170.0601bmqB0.3024.210.0560.4823.4.22.36NA
180.0602k7zA0.4344.800.0670.8043.4.22.61NA
190.0601vncA0.4924.300.0820.8391.11.1.1033,61,79

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.100.5623.180.050.792g18D GO:0010024 GO:0016491 GO:0016636 GO:0050620 GO:0050897 GO:0055114
10.070.5663.290.060.812d1eA GO:0010024 GO:0016491 GO:0016636 GO:0050620 GO:0050897 GO:0055114
20.070.4543.890.110.713anlA GO:0008299 GO:0016114 GO:0016491 GO:0019288 GO:0030145 GO:0030604 GO:0042802 GO:0046872 GO:0051484 GO:0055114 GO:0070402
30.070.4223.690.040.654r2wD GO:0003824 GO:0004850 GO:0005737 GO:0006139 GO:0009116 GO:0009166 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016763 GO:0044206
40.070.4314.640.050.774bmqA GO:0004748 GO:0005971 GO:0006260 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
50.070.4223.550.030.642hn9A GO:0003824 GO:0004850 GO:0005737 GO:0009116 GO:0009166 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016763 GO:0044206
60.070.4514.420.060.755jmfA GO:0016829 GO:0042597
70.070.3914.550.030.671t0uA GO:0003824 GO:0004850 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006974 GO:0009116 GO:0009166 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016763 GO:0042802 GO:0044206
80.070.3994.900.020.791pn4D GO:0003824 GO:0005777 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006635 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016616 GO:0016829 GO:0016853 GO:0055114
90.060.4243.640.040.654g8jB GO:0003824 GO:0004850 GO:0005737 GO:0009116 GO:0009166 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0016763 GO:0044206
100.060.3954.900.080.793lacA GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008234 GO:0016787 GO:0016920
110.060.4933.310.050.712x9oA GO:0010024 GO:0016491 GO:0016636 GO:0050617 GO:0050897 GO:0055114
120.060.3994.900.030.772qo3B GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0017000 GO:0031177 GO:0033068 GO:0047879 GO:0048037 GO:0055114
130.060.3694.980.050.722c2nA GO:0003824 GO:0004314 GO:0005739 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0044822
140.060.3735.380.080.782h1yB GO:0003824 GO:0004314 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
150.060.3935.180.030.814bmsF GO:0000166
160.060.3784.750.090.683k89A GO:0003824 GO:0004314 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
170.060.3525.320.140.753qatA GO:0003824 GO:0004314 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
180.060.3735.160.060.784bmnA GO:0000166


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016627 GO:0046914
GO-Score 0.31 0.31
Biological Processes GO:0044710 GO:0051188 GO:0051202 GO:0033014
GO-Score 0.53 0.31 0.31 0.31
Cellular Component GO:0016021 GO:0005971
GO-Score 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.