[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2916c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.74 61 2j7pD GNP Rep, Mult 109,110,111,112,113,114,115,119,140,146,199,255,257,280,281,282,283
20.08 10 2cnwD UUU Rep, Mult 109,110,140
30.05 5 3synA MG Rep, Mult 114,137,196
40.02 2 2cnwD 5GP Rep, Mult 139,198,199,207,210
50.02 3 3synB III Rep, Mult 138,139,140,141
60.02 2 3ndbB PO4 Rep, Mult 108,110,111,112,113,114,140
70.02 4 3synA III Rep, Mult 114,122,150,153,154,283,284,285
80.02 2 1okkA BZP Rep, Mult 256,279,281,289,290,291,292,295
90.01 1 2cnwB 5GP Rep, Mult 283,284
100.01 1 2j45A NA Rep, Mult 112,113,114,115,146
110.01 1 2xxaB MG Rep, Mult 114,140
120.01 1 2j37W III Rep, Mult 342,346,349,357,358,359,360,361,362,363,366,376,423,426,427,430,433,487,488,489
130.01 1 1ls1A OXY Rep, Mult 157,158
140.01 1 1qzwA NUC Rep, Mult 382,385,386,387,388,389,402,405,409,410,411
150.01 1 2j46B MN Rep, Mult 213,216
160.01 2 3e70C GDP Rep, Mult 159,160,161,180,184,187
170.01 1 2px0H GNP Rep, Mult 109,201
180.01 1 1okkA BZP Rep, Mult 96,99,100
190.01 1 2j289 III Rep, Mult 313,317,339,342,356,370,372,373,377,379,380,383,416,417,419,420,421,422,423,424,427,431

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602r60A0.3496.830.0620.5312.4.1.14295
20.0602gblA0.3556.180.0430.5072.7.11.1110,112
30.0602zj7A0.3517.380.0560.5643.1.1.3NA
40.0601mhsA0.3626.610.0510.5413.6.3.6NA
50.0602vtfA0.3497.360.0380.5563.2.1.96NA
60.0601rs0A0.3396.980.0650.5223.4.21.47NA
70.0601rtkA0.3397.230.0570.5413.4.21.47119,121
80.0602qe7A0.3506.200.0640.4993.6.1.34261
90.0603ecqB0.3527.500.0480.5793.2.1.97NA
100.0602c4mC0.3607.190.0460.5712.4.1.1NA
110.0602j5wA0.3638.020.0410.6291.16.3.1NA
120.0603f2bA0.3527.890.0500.6102.7.7.7NA
130.0602hldK0.3586.240.0760.5143.6.3.14NA
140.0601ea0A0.3277.990.0340.5621.4.1.13150
150.0602r4uA0.3516.690.0670.5312.4.1.21262
160.0602tmdA0.3487.650.0500.5681.5.8.2294
170.0602fknB0.3696.350.0700.5294.2.1.49NA
180.0602jkpB0.3546.950.0810.5393.2.1.2045,108,263
190.0601fx0A0.3506.320.0610.5073.6.3.14261

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.490.5093.240.350.572iy3A GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0030529 GO:0048500
10.470.6402.990.470.715gadi GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0030529 GO:0048500
20.450.4392.800.200.482px0A GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005622 GO:0005886 GO:0006614 GO:0006810 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0044781
30.400.5162.870.280.573ndbB GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0030529 GO:0048500
40.360.4622.720.490.505l3rC GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005786 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0009570 GO:0030529 GO:0048500 GO:0080085
50.350.4723.890.330.553dmdB GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0016020 GO:0031226
60.340.4653.200.330.522q9aA GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0016020 GO:0031226
70.310.5143.150.360.572ffhA GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0030529 GO:0048500
80.310.5072.790.330.551j8mF GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0030529 GO:0048500
90.220.4753.540.350.542yhsA GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0016020 GO:0031226
100.200.8731.410.310.902j37W GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0005786 GO:0005829 GO:0006614 GO:0006616 GO:0006617 GO:0008144 GO:0008312 GO:0019003 GO:0030529 GO:0030942 GO:0042493 GO:0043021 GO:0044822 GO:0045047 GO:0048500
110.170.4513.400.270.515l3qB GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005047 GO:0005525 GO:0005783 GO:0005785 GO:0005789 GO:0006613 GO:0006614 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0036498 GO:0044822 GO:0070062
120.160.4563.000.230.515l3wA GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0016020 GO:0031226
130.090.6504.260.410.782j289 GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0030529 GO:0048500
140.070.4853.240.320.552og2A GO:0000166 GO:0005525 GO:0006614 GO:0009507 GO:0009535 GO:0009536 GO:0009570 GO:0009579 GO:0016020 GO:0046872
150.070.5313.200.290.593dm5A GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0030529 GO:0048500
160.070.5123.270.270.571qzwA GO:0000166 GO:0003723 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0030529 GO:0048500
170.070.4743.220.290.534ak9A GO:0005525 GO:0005622 GO:0006614
180.070.4713.030.370.521vmaA GO:0000166 GO:0003924 GO:0005525 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0006612 GO:0006614 GO:0016020 GO:0031226 GO:0051301


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005525 GO:0003924 GO:0008312
GO-Score 0.94 0.94 0.90
Biological Processes GO:0006614 GO:0044781
GO-Score 0.94 0.45
Cellular Component GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0009570 GO:0005786 GO:0080085
GO-Score 0.47 0.45 0.36 0.36 0.36

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.