[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2910c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 4 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.44 107 4stdA BFS Rep, Mult 32,52,72,73,101,103,105,117,119,121,137,139,141
20.05 12 2inxA FFP Rep, Mult 28,32,52,101,119,121,137,139
30.03 7 4j8tC DOG Rep, Mult 32,40,52,68,73,119,137,139,141
40.02 4 5fw5A III Rep, Mult 19,20,23,24,26,27,30,31,34,38,42,43,128,131,132
50.01 2 2bngB CA Rep, Mult 17,131
60.01 2 3fzwA EQU Rep, Mult 28,52,102,104,106,116,141
70.01 2 3hx8D IMD Rep, Mult 25,28,83,97,121,123,134
80.01 3 4xbyC 3ZS Rep, Mult 32,69,79,137
90.00 1 2z77B HE7 Rep, Mult 54,77,79,103,105,107,115,147
100.00 1 2z77C HE7 Rep, Mult 73,107,108,113
110.00 1 3cnxB MG Rep, Mult 33,81

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.2638choA0.7052.300.0910.8235.3.3.131,125
20.1992ux0A0.6922.920.1300.8912.7.11.1732
30.1923en1B0.7053.170.1330.9051.14.12.3,1.14.12.1123,36,83
40.1321o7hB0.7052.810.1200.8841.14.12.1240
50.0601e3vB0.6982.530.1450.8375.3.3.128,51,122
60.0602bixA0.4364.330.0570.6461.14.99.-NA
70.0603e99A0.6842.710.1240.8641.14.12.10NA
80.0601w6sC0.5254.320.0630.8031.1.99.8NA
90.0601z45A0.4434.920.0510.7485.1.3.2,5.1.3.366
100.0604stdA0.8202.010.1620.9184.2.1.9433,52,81
110.0601i78A0.4394.130.0170.7013.4.23.49NA
120.0603elqB0.4814.220.0330.7142.8.2.22NA
130.0601buqA0.6602.720.1150.8305.3.3.128,44
140.0602htaA0.4384.610.0260.6805.1.3.-139
150.0601kv9A0.5034.070.0820.7481.1.99.-NA
160.0602d0vA0.5304.290.0480.8091.1.99.8NA
170.0603ecqB0.4445.300.0690.8093.2.1.97NA
180.0602gewA0.4364.610.0330.7211.1.3.6NA
190.0603lrkA0.4424.880.0510.7553.2.1.2284
200.0602fhcA0.4514.680.0370.7283.2.1.4140
210.0602x4mA0.4684.350.0430.7483.4.23.48NA
220.0601kb0A0.5014.010.0920.7551.1.99.-17
230.0603gzxB0.6992.980.1100.8981.14.12.1833,37,83

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.470.9311.450.151.004lehA GO:0016829 GO:0033988
10.410.9121.470.170.994l8pA GO:0016829 GO:0033988
20.380.9181.240.150.974l8oA GO:0016829 GO:0033988
30.340.8371.800.170.933a76B GO:0009636 GO:0016829 GO:0042597
40.250.6742.840.140.844cdlA GO:0004769 GO:0006629 GO:0008202 GO:0016853
50.230.6972.590.140.843t8nB GO:0004769 GO:0006629 GO:0008202 GO:0016853
60.230.6862.690.130.865ig4E GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0004683 GO:0005516 GO:0005524 GO:0006468 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
70.220.6792.850.110.852f86B GO:0000165 GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0004683 GO:0005516 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0006468 GO:0010628 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0018105 GO:0018107 GO:0030424 GO:0042995 GO:0043005 GO:0043204 GO:0044325 GO:0046872 GO:0072375 GO:1904115
80.200.6672.810.090.831z1sA GO:0017000
90.200.6932.340.120.835ig0A GO:0000166 GO:0004672 GO:0004674 GO:0004683 GO:0005516 GO:0005524 GO:0006468 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740
100.170.6932.700.130.845cxoB GO:0016787
110.150.8202.010.160.924stdA GO:0006582 GO:0016829 GO:0030411 GO:0042438 GO:0043581
120.060.3175.540.050.602refA GO:0003824 GO:0008080 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0031177
130.060.2925.610.070.573kh7A GO:0005886 GO:0015036 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016491 GO:0017004 GO:0030288 GO:0045454 GO:0055114
140.060.2955.500.090.563n2nA GO:0004872 GO:0004888 GO:0005518 GO:0005886 GO:0007165 GO:0009986 GO:0010008 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0022414 GO:0031258 GO:0031527 GO:0031532 GO:0034446 GO:0042995 GO:0046872 GO:0051015 GO:0070062
150.060.2915.750.040.582r2iA GO:0001750 GO:0005509 GO:0005886 GO:0007601 GO:0007602 GO:0008048 GO:0030249 GO:0031282 GO:0031284 GO:0046872 GO:0050896 GO:0071277
160.060.3035.210.060.563f0hA
170.060.2815.950.040.601bs4A GO:0005506 GO:0005829 GO:0006412 GO:0008198 GO:0008270 GO:0016787 GO:0031365 GO:0042586 GO:0043022 GO:0043686 GO:0046872
180.060.2945.210.020.512gieA GO:0003677 GO:0004518 GO:0004519 GO:0009036 GO:0009307 GO:0016787 GO:0090305


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0033988 GO:0016863
GO-Score 0.81 0.50
Biological Processes GO:1901360 GO:0044710 GO:0044238 GO:0009636
GO-Score 0.50 0.50 0.43 0.34
Cellular Component GO:0042597
GO-Score 0.34

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.