[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2842c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.07 4 1qb8A MG Rep, Mult 45,54
20.05 3 4l6vf CLA Rep, Mult 55,58
30.05 3 1rvkA MG Rep, Mult 45,82,89
40.04 2 1nzwA NA Rep, Mult 105,106,151
50.04 2 3d7oA NO2 Rep, Mult 15,27,29,62
60.04 2 2g42B CA Rep, Mult 51,54
70.04 2 1m8vG NUC Rep, Mult 89,90
80.04 2 3glnA XE Rep, Mult 26,29,58,82
90.02 1 4zmmB C2E Rep, Mult 17,18,19,20,21,61
100.02 1 1s61A NBN Rep, Mult 11,30,31,62,81
110.02 1 3iwkD NAD Rep, Mult 16,17,58,61,62
120.02 1 4w50B BU2 Rep, Mult 43,45
130.02 1 3ajoA MG Rep, Mult 10,13
140.02 1 3quiC ANP Rep, Mult 110,116,141
150.02 1 2zyqB TAR Rep, Mult 86,87
160.02 1 2onmK ADP Rep, Mult 11,12,15,59,63

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601bxsA0.5034.930.0690.7811.2.1.36NA
20.0602j6lB0.5085.180.0690.8091.2.1.31,1.2.1.3NA
30.0601hbmA0.4914.870.0720.7702.8.4.1NA
40.0601bi9D0.4525.550.0240.7701.2.1.36,1.2.1.-NA
50.0601o9jA0.5034.960.0760.7871.2.1.3147
60.0602vroB0.4815.310.0580.7981.2.1.3NA
70.0603b4wA0.4705.460.0980.7921.2.1.-NA
80.0603ifh60.3425.800.0490.6281.2.1.1646
90.0602esdA0.4875.220.0590.7811.2.1.9NA
100.0601wndA0.4955.210.0550.7921.2.1.1914,28,48,82
110.0601o01C0.4974.720.0470.7651.2.1.3NA
120.0602o2pA0.4675.490.0470.7981.5.1.689
130.0601t90A0.4705.280.0470.7811.2.1.18,1.2.1.27NA
140.0602opxA0.4955.170.0630.7981.2.1.21,1.2.1.22NA
150.0603ju8A0.4875.290.0860.8031.2.1.71NA
160.0602d4eC0.4895.120.0930.7871.2.1.60NA
170.0602ve5A0.4914.980.0570.7871.2.1.8NA
180.0601cqxB0.4605.170.0700.7541.14.12.17159
190.0601uxvA0.4755.350.0640.7871.2.1.9NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.410.8311.050.200.861ib8A GO:0005737 GO:0042254 GO:0042274
10.070.4745.350.070.794pz2B GO:0004029 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0055114
20.070.5305.110.070.875iv5A GO:0019012 GO:0019076 GO:0098025
30.070.4885.330.080.813ju8A GO:0004029 GO:0006525 GO:0006527 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0019544 GO:0019545 GO:0043824 GO:0055114
40.070.4975.350.050.833pqaB GO:0008152 GO:0008911 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0055114
50.070.4915.540.060.843v4cA GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0033721 GO:0055114
60.070.5005.130.030.803iwjA GO:0000166 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0055114
70.070.5135.260.080.851eyyA GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0033721 GO:0055114
80.070.4485.750.060.804iymC GO:0000166 GO:0004491 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0055114
90.070.4895.120.090.792d4eC GO:0000166 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0018480 GO:0055114 GO:1901023
100.070.4875.220.060.782esdA GO:0008152 GO:0008886 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0047100 GO:0055114
110.070.4705.460.100.793b4wA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005886 GO:0008152 GO:0016208 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0043531 GO:0051287 GO:0055114 GO:0070404 GO:0071949
120.070.4965.170.060.804dalB GO:0000166 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0055114
130.070.4775.290.060.781ky8A GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0008152 GO:0008886 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0050661 GO:0051287 GO:0055114
140.070.4665.080.040.753rosA GO:0008152 GO:0009013 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0055114
150.070.4765.500.050.814pxlB GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0055114
160.070.5025.110.070.795abmA GO:0001758 GO:0004029 GO:0005737 GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0042572 GO:0055114 GO:0070062
170.070.4974.990.030.794v37A GO:0004030 GO:0006081 GO:0008152 GO:0008802 GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0019285 GO:0055114
180.070.4535.350.080.763r64A GO:0008152 GO:0016491 GO:0016620 GO:0018479 GO:0055114


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016903
GO-Score 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0042274 GO:0044710
GO-Score 0.41 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.41

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.