[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2811

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.20 10 3jueA ZN Rep, Mult 22,25,56,59
20.06 3 5bq6A EFB Rep, Mult 81,84,85,88
30.04 2 5ezmA MPG Rep, Mult 120,123
40.02 1 2uxpA CLM Rep, Mult 117,148,152,178,180
50.02 1 3btjB DEQ Rep, Mult 82,85,127
60.02 1 1jt0C QNA Rep, Mult 1,71,72,73,74,75,78,79
70.02 1 1jt0A QNA Rep, Mult 1,71,78,79,82,83
80.02 1 4xlrM NUC Rep, Mult 82,141,142,143
90.02 1 3aqtB RCO Rep, Mult 95,109,112,113,116,151,152,155,178
100.02 1 3h45O PO4 Rep, Mult 83,86
110.02 1 3ze3A 78M Rep, Mult 123,130
120.02 1 3ehbB HEA Rep, Mult 120,148
130.02 1 2rek0 III Rep, Mult 109,163,176,177,179,183,186,187,198,200

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602vuaA0.3426.080.0260.6443.4.24.6971
20.0601i8qA0.4435.120.0710.7034.2.2.129
30.0603evhA0.4415.330.0480.7184.2.2.3NA
40.0602pflA0.4424.960.0440.6982.3.1.54NA
50.0602ztgA0.4365.160.0760.6986.1.1.727,129
60.0602q8gA0.4435.330.0730.7182.7.11.2121
70.0601s4bP0.4404.180.0670.6193.4.24.15NA
80.0602v8tA0.4594.470.0460.6831.11.1.6NA
90.0601fa2A0.4525.350.0460.7333.2.1.2NA
100.0601tazA0.4414.900.0360.6683.1.4.17NA
110.0602vr5A0.4734.620.0320.6983.2.1.-NA
120.0601i1iP0.4584.030.0630.6293.4.24.1619
130.0602d0tB0.4535.240.0490.7181.13.11.52NA
140.0603btaA0.4364.430.0520.6393.4.24.69NA
150.0602e9bA0.4554.650.0320.6833.2.1.41NA
160.0602pnrB0.4405.360.0400.7032.7.11.2NA
170.0602fhcA0.4994.680.0640.7623.2.1.4179
180.0601lj8A0.4515.380.0870.7671.1.1.67NA
190.0601y8pA0.4565.250.0450.7132.7.11.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.210.5373.880.100.723vuqC GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
10.090.6283.320.140.812rekB GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
20.090.5115.110.050.833bhqA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
30.080.5514.590.110.834ichA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
40.070.6043.530.200.802q24B GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
50.070.5873.930.130.812oerB GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
60.070.5264.720.120.812g7sA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
70.070.5394.040.130.762qwtA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
80.070.5684.370.100.822o7tA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
90.070.5434.530.040.803f0cA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
100.070.5314.550.090.802qtqA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
110.070.5354.540.100.804gclB GO:0003677 GO:0005737 GO:0007049 GO:0009295 GO:0010974 GO:0043565 GO:0043590 GO:0051301 GO:0051302
120.070.5264.500.060.793on4A GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
130.070.5024.860.110.802id3A GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0046872
140.070.5044.930.100.812g3bA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
150.070.5084.510.090.754g12A GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
160.070.5254.330.120.762hytA GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355
170.070.5184.570.080.784gctC GO:0000976 GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006355 GO:0007049 GO:0009295 GO:0010974 GO:0043565 GO:0043590 GO:0051301 GO:0051302
180.070.4864.990.120.783on2B GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003677
GO-Score 0.44
Biological Processes GO:0006355
GO-Score 0.44
Cellular Component
GO-Score

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.