[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2804c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.13 8 3fs4A OXY Rep, Mult 2,6
20.06 4 1xoiB 288 Rep, Mult 7,11,107,108
30.05 3 2d2mB HEM Rep, Mult 10,14
40.03 2 1xp3A ZN Rep, Mult 152,180,182
50.03 2 1l5qA CFF Rep, Mult 19,22,24,25
60.03 2 1ao0A MG Rep, Mult 99,139,140
70.02 1 2atiA IHU Rep, Mult 36,37,38,40,41
80.02 1 3nb0C G6P Rep, Mult 4,5,7,8,11
90.02 1 2iegB FRY Rep, Mult 7,11,121
100.02 1 2eb1C MG Rep, Mult 180,184
110.02 1 3cemA AVD Rep, Mult 17,18,19,26
120.02 1 2phdA FE Rep, Mult 76,77,152
130.02 1 4awyB ZN Rep, Mult 3,4,152
140.02 1 3db1D PO4 Rep, Mult 10,11,22
150.02 1 3v2dF MG Rep, Mult 42,43
160.02 1 2xgfA FE2 Rep, Mult 76,77

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603i39X0.4934.700.0710.7561.2.99.2109
20.0607mdhB0.4814.720.0740.7271.1.1.82NA
30.0601iphA0.5044.540.1190.7511.11.1.6NA
40.0601sy7B0.5154.720.0720.7801.11.1.6NA
50.0603cf4A0.4954.770.0430.7611.2.99.2NA
60.0602c4mC0.6194.250.0900.8902.4.1.1NA
70.0602qllA0.6204.200.0430.8852.4.1.1NA
80.0601rzuB0.5944.240.1040.8612.4.1.21NA
90.0603d5tC0.4765.110.0470.7701.1.1.3722
100.0601y8zA0.5334.370.0950.7892.4.1.264
110.0602azdB0.6214.240.0860.8902.4.1.122,121
120.0601ldnA0.4745.120.0530.7701.1.1.2722
130.0601f0kB0.5164.660.1030.7852.4.1.2277
140.0601civA0.4985.060.0390.8041.1.1.82NA
150.0601b8pA0.4765.150.0410.7751.1.1.3722
160.0601gz5A0.5444.590.0710.8232.4.1.15187
170.0602gejA0.5504.280.1450.7942.4.1.5798
180.0601o6cB0.5254.000.0490.7465.1.3.14NA
190.0603dzcA0.5654.040.1030.7995.1.3.143

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.6254.290.060.901ygpA GO:0004645 GO:0005737 GO:0005975 GO:0005977 GO:0005980 GO:0008184 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0030170
10.070.5943.930.100.822bisA GO:0004373
20.070.5954.020.100.834zj8A GO:0004373 GO:0004871 GO:0004930 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0007165 GO:0007186 GO:0007218 GO:0007268 GO:0007631 GO:0008188 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016499 GO:0017046 GO:0032870 GO:0042277 GO:0045187 GO:0051480 GO:1901652
30.070.5924.030.110.834s0vA GO:0004373 GO:0004871 GO:0004930 GO:0005886 GO:0005887 GO:0007165 GO:0007186 GO:0007200 GO:0007218 GO:0007268 GO:0007631 GO:0008188 GO:0010840 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016499 GO:0017046 GO:0022410 GO:0032870 GO:0042277 GO:0045187 GO:0051480 GO:1901652
40.070.5974.070.100.842iv7A GO:0008919 GO:0009103 GO:0009244 GO:0016740 GO:0016757
50.060.4115.430.050.683wczA GO:0006629 GO:0008202 GO:0016491 GO:0055114
60.060.6293.910.060.873nazC GO:0003824 GO:0004373 GO:0005737 GO:0005978 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016757
70.060.6403.800.060.883nb0C GO:0003824 GO:0004373 GO:0005737 GO:0005978 GO:0008152 GO:0016740 GO:0016757
80.060.6204.210.040.891fa9A GO:0000166 GO:0002060 GO:0003824 GO:0004645 GO:0005524 GO:0005536 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0005975 GO:0005977 GO:0005980 GO:0006015 GO:0008144 GO:0008152 GO:0008184 GO:0016208 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0019842 GO:0030170 GO:0030246 GO:0032052 GO:0042593 GO:0042803 GO:0070062 GO:0070266
90.060.6164.340.050.904l22A GO:0004645 GO:0005975 GO:0008184 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0030170
100.060.6204.280.060.894bqfB GO:0003824 GO:0004645 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0005980 GO:0008152 GO:0008184 GO:0009414 GO:0009507 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0030170 GO:0046686
110.060.6194.250.090.892c4mC GO:0004645 GO:0005975 GO:0008184 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0030170
120.060.6373.850.070.884qlbD GO:0004373 GO:0005978 GO:0016740 GO:0016757
130.060.6244.200.040.891e1yA GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0004645 GO:0005975 GO:0005977 GO:0008152 GO:0008184 GO:0016740 GO:0016757 GO:0030170
140.060.3464.930.050.543douA GO:0001510 GO:0005737 GO:0006364 GO:0008168 GO:0008650 GO:0016740 GO:0031167 GO:0032259
150.060.5974.210.080.852r60A GO:0005985 GO:0016157
160.060.2886.200.040.553a7aA GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006464 GO:0009249 GO:0016874 GO:0016979 GO:0018055
170.060.3315.680.040.594amtA GO:0001822 GO:0001823 GO:0002003 GO:0002016 GO:0002018 GO:0004175 GO:0004190 GO:0005102 GO:0005159 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0005764 GO:0005886 GO:0006508 GO:0008217 GO:0008233 GO:0008584 GO:0009755 GO:0010033 GO:0016020 GO:0016787 GO:0030163 GO:0032496 GO:0035690 GO:0035902 GO:0042493 GO:0042756 GO:0043408 GO:0048469 GO:0050435 GO:0051591 GO:0070305
180.060.3165.360.050.533ec1A GO:0005525


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0035251
GO-Score 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0051480 GO:1901652 GO:0032870 GO:0045187 GO:0007268 GO:0007218 GO:0007631 GO:0005980 GO:0010840 GO:0009244 GO:0007200
GO-Score 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Cellular Component GO:0005887 GO:0005737
GO-Score 0.13 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.