[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2799

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.20 9 1cnzA MN Rep, Mult 84,88
20.07 3 4dcaA MG Rep, Mult 114,134
30.05 2 2xybA ZN Rep, Mult 143,157
40.05 2 2ek8A ZN Rep, Mult 80,84
50.02 1 3fw6A ZN Rep, Mult 134,156
60.02 1 2y2gA NA Rep, Mult 163,193,194
70.02 1 1c8nA CA Rep, Mult 139,196
80.02 1 3rr5A MG Rep, Mult 79,137
90.02 1 2y6pC MG Rep, Mult 84,191
100.02 1 3lw52 CLA Rep, Mult 168,170

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602g8eA0.3505.520.0250.6033.4.22.52NA
20.0603lmdA0.4045.150.0240.6462.5.1.30138
30.0602vdcF0.4075.810.0360.7371.4.1.13132
40.0603fsnB0.4065.890.0340.7275.2.1.7NA
50.0603ij3A0.4095.120.0470.6513.4.11.1111
60.0603fwmA0.4226.100.0410.7802.4.1.129,NA
70.0601e6yA0.4045.320.0220.6702.8.4.1NA
80.0602jgdA0.4085.810.0390.7131.2.4.2NA
90.0603ipiA0.3995.340.0630.6552.5.1.-84
100.0601qxpB0.4026.090.0480.7613.4.22.53,3.4.22.52201
110.0603f2bA0.4055.730.0390.6942.7.7.7200
120.0602fahA0.4045.670.0560.7034.1.1.32NA
130.0602zufA0.4056.090.0520.7376.1.1.1990
140.0603cskA0.4265.560.0510.7323.4.14.4193
150.0601xc6A0.3916.480.0590.7613.2.1.23110
160.0602ebsB0.4055.900.0550.7323.2.1.150131
170.0602p4eA0.4146.020.0760.7753.4.21.-NA
180.0601vncA0.3965.320.0800.6651.11.1.10NA
190.0601htoA0.4025.600.0440.6946.3.1.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.100.6743.680.090.865bmqA GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
10.070.4804.810.080.724lpqA GO:0016740
20.070.4404.770.040.693memA GO:0002161 GO:0006450
30.070.4415.710.030.781lmlA GO:0004222 GO:0005886 GO:0006508 GO:0007155 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0016020 GO:0016787 GO:0031225 GO:0046872 GO:0052014 GO:0052032
40.070.4385.780.060.753lwtX GO:0004438 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0005797 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016787 GO:0016791 GO:0030173 GO:0030176 GO:0035339 GO:0036092 GO:0042578 GO:0043812 GO:0043813 GO:0046856
50.060.4354.650.060.673hc1A GO:0005730 GO:0016787 GO:0046872
60.060.4414.660.070.634lzhA GO:0016740
70.060.3884.400.070.544xxtA GO:0004180 GO:0006508 GO:0016740 GO:0016787
80.060.3983.930.060.532hklA GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016740
90.060.3835.120.090.633p3qB GO:0000160 GO:0005622
100.060.3614.240.060.514jmnA GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008360 GO:0009252 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0018104 GO:0042597 GO:0071555 GO:0071972
110.060.3604.130.050.504xvoA GO:0016740
120.060.3166.220.050.604a2mB GO:0000155 GO:0000160 GO:0003677 GO:0003700 GO:0005622 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0007165 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016772 GO:0023014 GO:0043565
130.060.3745.390.060.624hzdA GO:0005737 GO:0006535 GO:0009001 GO:0016740
140.060.3653.950.020.484qr7A GO:0005886 GO:0008360 GO:0009252 GO:0016020 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
150.060.3823.720.040.494k73A GO:0008360 GO:0009252 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0071555
160.060.3455.510.060.582hekA GO:0006203 GO:0008832 GO:0046872
170.060.3385.950.030.611lbuA GO:0004180 GO:0005576 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008237 GO:0009046 GO:0016787 GO:0046872 GO:0071555
180.060.3865.360.050.632ongA GO:0000287 GO:0008152 GO:0010333 GO:0016829 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0016740 GO:0004222 GO:0043813 GO:0043812 GO:0046872 GO:0004438 GO:0002161
GO-Score 0.16 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Biological Processes GO:0006450 GO:0007155 GO:0006508 GO:0036092 GO:0052032 GO:0052014 GO:0046856
GO-Score 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Cellular Component GO:0030173 GO:0005886 GO:0030176 GO:0035339 GO:0031225 GO:0005797
GO-Score 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.