[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2762c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.36 25 1gheA ACO Rep, Mult 19,84,85,86,87,88,89,94,95,97,98,99,100,120,121,122,130,131,133,134,135,137
20.04 3 3n6hA MG Rep, Mult 72,90,121
30.01 1 3e25A MG Rep, Mult 72,76
40.01 1 1w0hA MG Rep, Mult 32,125
50.01 1 2dkiA XE Rep, Mult 45,60,67,68,82
60.01 1 1dxeA MG Rep, Mult 90,125
70.01 1 3zvwC MG Rep, Mult 62,63
80.01 1 3n1cA F6P Rep, Mult 53,54
90.01 1 1izcA MG Rep, Mult 46,72

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.1071qsmD0.7252.690.0630.9062.3.1.48101
20.1052cntD0.7022.230.1210.8352.3.1.128113
30.0861i1dD0.6823.330.0800.8852.3.1.4NA
40.0732vezA0.6633.270.0900.8632.3.1.4NA
50.0673d3sA0.6602.870.1190.8492.3.1.178101
60.0673igrA0.7023.300.0920.9212.3.1.128119
70.0672z11A0.6393.310.0900.8632.3.1.128NA
80.0602vqyA0.6803.410.0940.8992.3.1.82NA
90.0601fy7A0.6043.270.1080.7992.3.1.48NA
100.0602o28A0.6483.230.1240.8562.3.1.487
110.0601q2yA0.6722.380.1320.8202.3.1.-NA
120.0601bobA0.6322.870.0960.8272.3.1.48NA
130.0601vhsA0.6693.170.1200.8922.3.1.183NA
140.0602r8vA0.6692.720.1470.8352.3.1.1NA
150.0602beiB0.6693.350.0810.8852.3.1.57107
160.0602jevB0.6793.300.0870.9062.3.1.57NA
170.0601yvoB0.6893.210.1100.8992.3.-.-NA
180.0602pq8A0.5993.140.1000.7842.3.1.48NA
190.0601yghA0.6552.830.0500.8562.3.1.48NA
200.0601z4rA0.6622.690.0680.8422.3.1.48NA
210.0602ou2A0.5862.900.1090.7912.3.1.48NA
220.0601iykA0.6813.250.0630.9142.3.1.97NA
230.0601nmtA0.6793.260.0550.9142.3.1.9799
240.0602rc4A0.5873.000.0990.7992.3.1.48,NA
250.0601cm0A0.6682.670.0680.8422.3.1.48NA
260.0601k4jA0.5693.280.0940.7632.3.1.184NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.250.7102.950.170.912euiA GO:0004596 GO:0006474 GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0031248
10.210.7013.210.140.932cy2A GO:0008080 GO:0016740
20.180.6363.370.100.841bo4A GO:0008080 GO:0016740
30.170.6502.590.140.801y9kB GO:0004596 GO:0006474 GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0031248
40.140.7172.990.090.924e0aA GO:0008080
50.140.7382.560.110.902wpwA GO:0008080 GO:0033050
60.130.7182.510.070.903d8pB GO:0008080
70.130.7212.990.110.911gheB GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
80.130.7252.690.060.911qsmD GO:0004402 GO:0008080 GO:0016568 GO:0016573 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0051289
90.130.7352.800.100.943fixA GO:0004145 GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0043939
100.130.7063.160.120.932i79A GO:0008080 GO:0016740
110.130.7242.860.100.901z4eA GO:0008080
120.120.7023.200.090.914mbuA GO:0008080 GO:0016740
130.120.6932.920.070.891wwzA GO:0008080
140.120.6882.370.130.835isvA GO:0005737 GO:0006474 GO:0008080 GO:0008999 GO:0016407 GO:0016740 GO:0016746
150.120.7282.760.070.922r7hB GO:0008080 GO:0016740
160.120.6943.010.120.904yfjB GO:0008080 GO:0016740
170.110.6872.590.080.861yx0A GO:0004596 GO:0006474 GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0031248
180.110.6832.790.130.854qusB GO:0004596 GO:0006474 GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0016747 GO:0031248
190.110.6833.380.120.922fe7B GO:0008080 GO:0016740
200.110.6803.110.120.901vhsA GO:0004596 GO:0006474 GO:0008080 GO:0009635 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0031248 GO:0046677
210.110.6802.990.070.885f47B GO:0008080
220.100.6923.230.100.911yr0A GO:0008080 GO:0016740
230.100.6902.810.070.871b87A GO:0008080
240.100.7272.460.060.902q7bA GO:0008080 GO:0016740
250.090.6852.920.070.873ld2B GO:0008080 GO:0016740
260.080.6792.930.090.892q0yA GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0046872
270.080.6312.610.120.792atrA GO:0008080 GO:0016740
280.070.7182.880.110.931tiqA GO:0004145 GO:0004596 GO:0006474 GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0030435 GO:0031248 GO:0043939
290.070.6542.500.100.811yvkA GO:0004596 GO:0006474 GO:0008080 GO:0016740 GO:0016746 GO:0031248
300.070.6273.170.050.803t9yA GO:0008080 GO:0016740


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0004596
GO-Score 0.38
Biological Processes GO:0006474
GO-Score 0.38
Cellular Component GO:0031248
GO-Score 0.38

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.