[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2708c

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.27 14 2hw7A ZN Rep, Mult 52,69,72
20.12 6 4u0bK III Rep, Mult 76,79
30.04 2 3fu0A 22F Rep, Mult 56,58,62,65,66,70
40.02 1 3fueA 11S Rep, Mult 9,49,51
50.02 1 3obvA SUC Rep, Mult 38,72,73,76
60.02 1 4iqdA PYR Rep, Mult 73,74,77

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601h6dA0.4853.670.0130.8421.1.99.2876
20.0601gw6A0.4893.470.0600.8173.3.2.6NA
30.0602fbnA0.4633.590.0740.8295.2.1.822,25,27,48
40.0602ejwA0.4603.920.0590.8051.1.1.371
50.0602vn7A0.4953.610.0710.8543.2.1.3NA
60.0601wmdA0.3704.640.0240.7563.4.21.-NA
70.0602drsA0.4943.720.0380.8423.2.1.15629,42,76,79
80.0602o48X0.4733.900.0950.8661.1.1.179,1.3.1.20NA
90.0602qnoA0.5043.560.0570.8543.2.1.4NA
100.0603ciaA0.4673.740.0900.8173.4.11.-NA
110.0601j0mA0.4653.780.0740.8174.2.2.12NA
120.0603c5wA0.4114.350.0290.7933.1.3.1647
130.0601gcuA0.4714.010.1010.9021.3.1.2432
140.0601iwpA0.4724.190.0490.9154.2.1.30NA
150.0601h7aA0.4603.840.0750.8051.17.4.2NA
160.0601fp3A0.4644.250.0420.8545.1.3.811,43,49
170.0601b41A0.4703.730.0680.8173.1.1.7NA
180.0601cb7B0.4604.260.0380.8665.4.99.1NA
190.0602vn4A0.4993.380.0590.8293.2.1.354

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.070.3914.300.030.784knhB GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0006810 GO:0015031 GO:0051028
10.070.4294.250.050.834n03A GO:0006865
20.070.3894.450.070.773w3zA GO:0000059 GO:0000060 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006406 GO:0006606 GO:0006607 GO:0006610 GO:0006810 GO:0007088 GO:0008139 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0031965 GO:0034399 GO:0060188
30.070.4303.960.030.794jlqA GO:0000059 GO:0000060 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006607 GO:0006610 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0008139 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0016032 GO:0031965 GO:0034399 GO:0043488 GO:0044822 GO:0070062 GO:0072372
40.070.4833.490.040.841ialA GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006606 GO:0006607 GO:0006810 GO:0008139 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0042826 GO:0044822
50.070.5073.530.030.844xriA GO:0005622 GO:0006886 GO:0008536
60.070.4274.290.090.845cwuA GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0006810 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0031965 GO:0051028
70.070.4693.930.030.845hb4B GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0006810 GO:0015031 GO:0051028
80.070.4563.330.030.713w3uA GO:0000059 GO:0000060 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0006406 GO:0006606 GO:0006607 GO:0006610 GO:0006810 GO:0007088 GO:0008139 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0031965 GO:0034399 GO:0060188
90.060.4353.960.060.843nd2A GO:0000059 GO:0000060 GO:0000176 GO:0005087 GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0005737 GO:0006606 GO:0006607 GO:0006610 GO:0006612 GO:0006656 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0008139 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0031965 GO:0034399 GO:0043547 GO:0051028 GO:0051292 GO:0060188
100.060.4354.470.050.821qgkA GO:0000059 GO:0000060 GO:0005634 GO:0005635 GO:0005643 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006309 GO:0006606 GO:0006607 GO:0006610 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0007079 GO:0007080 GO:0008139 GO:0008270 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016032 GO:0019054 GO:0019899 GO:0019904 GO:0030953 GO:0031291 GO:0031965 GO:0034399 GO:0040001 GO:0043234 GO:0044822 GO:0045184 GO:0051879 GO:0070062 GO:0071782 GO:0075733 GO:0090307
110.060.4573.760.080.743ltjA
120.060.4074.200.030.825ijnD GO:0000059 GO:0005634 GO:0005635 GO:0005643 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0006406 GO:0006409 GO:0006810 GO:0006913 GO:0007077 GO:0010827 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016032 GO:0016925 GO:0017056 GO:0019083 GO:0031047 GO:0031965 GO:0034399 GO:0044611 GO:0051028 GO:0051292 GO:0075733 GO:1900034
130.060.4373.990.040.801qbkB GO:0000059 GO:0000060 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006607 GO:0006610 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0008139 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0016032 GO:0031965 GO:0034399 GO:0043488 GO:0044822 GO:0070062 GO:0072372
140.060.4313.940.030.842q5dB GO:0000059 GO:0000060 GO:0005634 GO:0005635 GO:0005643 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0006309 GO:0006606 GO:0006607 GO:0006610 GO:0006810 GO:0006886 GO:0007079 GO:0007080 GO:0008139 GO:0008270 GO:0008536 GO:0008565 GO:0015031 GO:0016020 GO:0016032 GO:0019054 GO:0019899 GO:0019904 GO:0030953 GO:0031291 GO:0031965 GO:0034399 GO:0040001 GO:0043234 GO:0044822 GO:0045184 GO:0051879 GO:0070062 GO:0071782 GO:0075733 GO:0090307
150.060.4213.980.100.804knhA GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0006810 GO:0015031 GO:0051028
160.060.4403.780.040.775dlqA GO:0005049 GO:0005634 GO:0005643 GO:0005654 GO:0005737 GO:0006611 GO:0006810 GO:0008536 GO:0015031 GO:0046827
170.060.4573.850.030.854kf8B GO:0005643 GO:0006406 GO:0006606 GO:0006999 GO:0017056 GO:0031990 GO:0044611
180.060.5193.260.040.854kf8A GO:0005643 GO:0006406 GO:0006606 GO:0006999 GO:0017056 GO:0031990 GO:0044611


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0005048 GO:0022892
GO-Score 0.37 0.37
Biological Processes GO:0006606
GO-Score 0.37
Cellular Component GO:0043231
GO-Score 0.48

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.