[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2683

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.39 65 2uv6A AMP Rep, Mult 24,27,28,29,49,50,51,52,53,152,153,154,156,157
20.18 34 3kpbA SAM Rep, Mult 64,66,68,69,111,113,114,115,137,138,139,140
30.04 9 2rc3A NAD Rep, Mult 133,134,137,138,139,155
40.01 3 1yav0 III Rep, Mult 17,42,44,45,50,102,127,130,155,156,158,159,162,163
50.01 2 2j9l3 III Rep, Mult 60,61,62,112,113,115,118,124,132,135,136,146,147
60.01 2 2v92E ATP Rep, Mult 50,67
70.01 2 2nyc0 III Rep, Mult 38,42,45,48,50,66,67,68,71,72,74,133,134,138,139,155,159,160,162,163
80.01 3 3k2vA CMK Rep, Mult 48,49,50,67,154,156
90.00 1 3fnaA AMP Rep, Mult 64,66,68,69,72,111,138
100.00 1 3kh5A AMP Rep, Mult 85,88,89,92,93,108
110.00 1 2y94E III Rep, Mult 55,60,116,144,146,147,148
120.00 1 2j9l0 III Rep, Mult 126,130,131,133,134

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0603ljkA0.4214.940.0560.7095.3.1.9NA
20.0602vz8A0.3515.190.0430.6182.3.1.85NA
30.0602djiA0.4255.330.0200.7761.2.3.3NA
40.0602o2dB0.4255.090.0900.7155.3.1.9NA
50.0601onxA0.4005.210.0410.6973.4.19.-NA
60.0602z8kC0.3495.150.0530.6182.3.2.273
70.0602hb6B0.4144.740.0470.6673.4.11.136
80.0602vz9B0.3925.710.0810.7272.3.1.85NA
90.0601ynyB0.4134.920.0450.6853.5.2.2146
100.0602hb6A0.4144.740.0470.6673.4.11.1NA
110.0602wu8A0.4475.230.0580.8125.3.1.9NA
120.0602e1rA0.4364.680.0780.6853.6.5.3NA
130.0601k1dA0.4154.890.0520.6853.5.2.-NA
140.0602z8yD0.4225.610.0710.8121.2.7.4,1.2.99.2122,130,143
150.0602e0wB0.4395.060.0770.7642.3.2.2NA
160.0601a5lC0.4165.170.0630.6853.5.1.534
170.0602q8nB0.4595.140.0660.8005.3.1.9NA
180.0603ifsE0.4225.090.0360.7275.3.1.972
190.0602v3eA0.4265.120.0430.7273.2.1.45NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.390.8861.610.190.964esyA GO:0006950
10.300.6412.180.250.755aweA GO:0003824
20.280.6232.570.200.764gqwA GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0045454
30.270.6012.600.190.744fryB GO:0000166
40.270.6202.500.210.764o9kA GO:0005975 GO:0016853 GO:0019146 GO:0030246
50.260.6222.510.200.744gqyA GO:0009507 GO:0009536 GO:0009570 GO:0045454
60.260.6542.700.140.793lqnA
70.240.6082.550.140.752o16B
80.240.6202.450.110.752p9mB
90.220.6722.990.070.863tdhC GO:0000166 GO:0001302 GO:0003824 GO:0004679 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005641 GO:0005737 GO:0005886 GO:0005975 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006357 GO:0006468 GO:0007031 GO:0031588 GO:0043539 GO:0045722 GO:0071902
100.220.6142.870.220.783ocoA GO:0003824 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016614 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
110.220.6282.400.150.753lv9A GO:0003824 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016614 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
120.220.5473.000.180.722yziB
130.220.5902.500.170.722ef7A
140.210.6162.470.190.732rifA GO:0000166
150.200.6592.840.110.814qfsC GO:0000166 GO:0004679 GO:0005524 GO:0005654 GO:0006468 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016208 GO:0019901 GO:0031588 GO:0042304 GO:0043234 GO:0043531 GO:0050790 GO:0051291
160.200.6812.680.160.822v8qE GO:0000166 GO:0004679 GO:0005524 GO:0005654 GO:0006468 GO:0006629 GO:0006631 GO:0006633 GO:0016208 GO:0019901 GO:0031588 GO:0042304 GO:0043234 GO:0043531 GO:0050790 GO:0051291
170.200.6173.060.160.793fhmA GO:0000166
180.200.6542.740.150.793ddjA GO:0000166 GO:0003824
190.200.6712.780.150.823fv6B GO:0003677 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0045013
200.180.5672.470.170.691vr9A GO:0008152 GO:0016597
210.180.5832.640.200.711xkfB GO:0001666 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005829 GO:0005886 GO:0046872 GO:0052553 GO:0052572
220.170.6282.310.140.733kpcA GO:0003824
230.170.5912.840.130.752emqA
240.170.5233.120.160.691pbjA
250.170.6713.140.120.862ooxE GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0005524 GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005829 GO:0005975 GO:0006351 GO:0006355 GO:0006357 GO:0007165 GO:0016208 GO:0030295 GO:0031588 GO:0032147
260.160.6122.440.130.733lfrB GO:0000166 GO:0003824 GO:0016614 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
270.160.6532.440.140.783lfzA
280.160.6352.730.100.793oi8A GO:0003824 GO:0016614 GO:0046872 GO:0050660 GO:0055114
290.150.6092.380.160.732rc3C GO:0000166
300.140.5893.070.150.741o50A GO:0003824
310.070.6312.750.120.773pc3A GO:0004122 GO:0004124 GO:0005737 GO:0006535 GO:0008340 GO:0008652 GO:0016829 GO:0019343 GO:0019344 GO:0030170 GO:0034976 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0036094 GO:1901265 GO:0016861
GO-Score 0.55 0.55 0.54
Biological Processes GO:0050794 GO:0019725 GO:0044238 GO:0071704 GO:0006950
GO-Score 0.57 0.57 0.47 0.44 0.39
Cellular Component GO:0044444 GO:0043231
GO-Score 0.57 0.57

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.