[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2680

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 5 4eptA 0QW Rep, Mult 83,84,85,150,169,171,186
20.04 2 1i7qB GLU Rep, Mult 73,87,101,102,103,170,171,172,173
30.04 2 3mflA DHY Rep, Mult 55,56,169
40.02 1 3e25A MG Rep, Mult 89,91
50.02 1 1ox4B POP Rep, Mult 61,62,87,88,105
60.02 1 3bz1A PHO Rep, Mult 186,190,194
70.02 1 1w5dA CA Rep, Mult 91,94,172
80.02 1 2zuvA NO3 Rep, Mult 48,59,60,84,85
90.02 1 4b4yA OXY Rep, Mult 182,186
100.02 1 1bpyA MG Rep, Mult 109,111
110.02 1 2b0qA MG Rep, Mult 89,111
120.02 1 2fkaA CXS Rep, Mult 35,180,184
130.02 1 1gpmA AMP Rep, Mult 85,86,87,171,173,183
140.02 1 3q9cA NA Rep, Mult 119,143,147
150.02 1 1gfmA C8E Rep, Mult 154,168
160.02 1 2bo6B MN Rep, Mult 111,117
170.02 1 3mflB DHY Rep, Mult 55,56
180.02 1 2wl3A CA Rep, Mult 90,130
190.02 1 3bz1H CLA Rep, Mult 186,189

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0662ywdA0.5373.800.1230.7242.6.-.-NA
20.0662ywjA0.5214.020.0580.7242.6.-.-NA
30.0661kxjA0.5643.940.0370.7712.4.2.-129
40.0661i7qB0.5293.980.1350.7294.1.3.27NA
50.0661qdlB0.5294.120.0250.7384.1.3.27NA
60.0603d54D0.5433.980.0810.7526.3.5.3NA
70.0601i7sB0.5284.070.0760.7434.1.3.27NA
80.0601vcnA0.5334.460.0660.7866.3.4.2NA
90.0602d7jA0.5413.950.0440.7436.3.5.2NA
100.0602ad5B0.5474.800.0740.8296.3.4.221
110.0602issD0.5293.950.0980.7242.6.-.-30,63,179
120.0602ghrA0.5654.080.0430.7812.3.1.46NA
130.0602abwB0.5474.250.1010.7812.6.-.-NA
140.0601kwgA0.6433.420.0980.8193.2.1.23NA
150.0601vcoA0.5334.670.0540.8096.3.4.2124
160.0601xfkA0.4855.230.1130.7813.5.3.870
170.0601r9gA0.5424.210.0980.7622.6.-.-NA
180.0601gpmA0.5234.210.0710.7526.3.5.2NA
190.0601i1qB0.5114.140.0780.7244.1.3.27NA
200.0602h2wA0.5624.050.0730.7862.3.1.46NA
210.0601ka9H0.5403.810.0910.7292.4.2.-NA
220.0601ox4B0.5393.910.0580.7384.1.3.-NA
230.0601s1mB0.5464.900.0700.8486.3.4.2NA
240.0602a9vD0.5464.150.0300.7676.3.5.2NA

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.100.6563.520.100.864uzsA GO:0004565 GO:0005975 GO:0006012 GO:0008152 GO:0009341 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
10.090.6683.620.120.875dfaA GO:0004565 GO:0005975 GO:0006012 GO:0008152 GO:0009341 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0046872
20.090.6433.420.100.821kwgA GO:0004565 GO:0005975 GO:0006012 GO:0008152 GO:0009341 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0046872
30.080.6563.550.130.864uniA GO:0004565 GO:0005975 GO:0006012 GO:0008152 GO:0009341 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
40.070.5214.020.060.722ywjA GO:0004359 GO:0005829 GO:0006541 GO:0006543 GO:0008614 GO:0016787 GO:0016829 GO:0036381 GO:0042819 GO:0042823 GO:1903600
50.070.4554.510.070.694n0qB GO:0006810 GO:0006865
60.070.4344.800.060.652f02A GO:0000166 GO:0005524 GO:0005975 GO:0005988 GO:0009024 GO:0016301 GO:0016310 GO:0016740 GO:0016773 GO:0019512 GO:2001059
70.070.4514.570.070.693i45A GO:0006865
80.060.4155.130.050.661be0A GO:0003824 GO:0009636 GO:0016787 GO:0018786 GO:0019260
90.060.4244.210.070.613oi9A
100.060.3585.990.050.651rh9A GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0016985 GO:0046355
110.060.3975.650.030.695c70A GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
120.060.3784.940.040.581g0cA GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0008810 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030245
130.060.3585.890.060.654d1iG GO:0004553 GO:0004565 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0009341 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
140.060.3865.800.060.684jkkA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798
150.060.3525.590.050.602h00A GO:0005634 GO:0008168 GO:0016740 GO:0032259 GO:0044822 GO:0052907 GO:0070475
160.060.3545.690.080.615a6aB GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0016787
170.060.3725.400.090.622osxA GO:0004553 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0047876
180.060.3625.790.050.633rdkB GO:0000272 GO:0004553 GO:0005576 GO:0005618 GO:0005975 GO:0008152 GO:0016052 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0030246 GO:0031176 GO:0045493
190.060.3695.900.020.661b90A GO:0000272 GO:0005975 GO:0005976 GO:0008152 GO:0016161 GO:0016787 GO:0016798 GO:0046872 GO:2001070


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0043169 GO:0004565
GO-Score 0.35 0.31
Biological Processes GO:0006012
GO-Score 0.31
Cellular Component GO:0009341
GO-Score 0.31

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.