[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2665

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.10 5 2kgoA ZN Rep, Mult 21,26,58,61
20.08 4 3fyiB HEA Rep, Mult 69,72
30.08 4 1eslA CA Rep, Mult 8,11
40.04 2 2jmoA ZN Rep, Mult 58,61,65,90
50.04 2 3a44A ZN Rep, Mult 58,61
60.04 2 1p8jF III Rep, Mult 29,30,31,32,69
70.04 2 4fmbA GDP Rep, Mult 75,78
80.02 1 1ocoB HEA Rep, Mult 66,67
90.02 1 4un3B MG Rep, Mult 14,15,17,76
100.02 1 1q0kE THJ Rep, Mult 73,76
110.02 1 3leeF B65 Rep, Mult 35,66,68,69,72

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0601nc3A0.4483.460.0830.7313.2.2.9NA
20.0601z5oA0.4483.460.0830.7313.2.2.99
30.0602iscD0.4593.500.0550.7422.4.2.1NA
40.0601s1mB0.4614.040.0650.8066.3.4.2NA
50.0601vcoA0.4643.920.1320.7966.3.4.211
60.0601vcnA0.4424.410.1390.8286.3.4.2NA
70.0602zunB0.4493.410.0970.7103.2.1.411
80.0602vn7A0.4633.760.1040.7633.2.1.314,88
90.0601iu8A0.4514.100.0840.7853.4.19.352
100.0601kblA0.4603.290.1180.7312.7.9.1NA
110.0602fknB0.4553.930.0390.7964.2.1.49NA
120.0601g87B0.4593.790.0810.7853.2.1.4NA
130.0602d6fA0.4484.350.0900.8506.3.5.-77
140.0601yhtA0.4504.270.0390.7963.2.1.5228
150.0601qbaA0.4594.120.0390.8173.2.1.5241
160.0601uwkA0.4724.260.0780.8284.2.1.49NA
170.0601zosA0.4493.430.0560.7313.2.2.16NA
180.0601vcmA0.4643.980.1320.7966.3.4.2NA
190.0602eabA0.4493.580.0530.6883.2.1.6318

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.060.4893.880.100.823acwA GO:0009058 GO:0016117 GO:0016740 GO:0016765
10.060.4923.550.040.783wccC GO:0004310 GO:0008610 GO:0009058 GO:0016021 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0046872 GO:0051996
20.060.3763.550.040.591elrA GO:0005634 GO:0005737 GO:0005794 GO:0006950 GO:0008022 GO:0030544 GO:0043209 GO:0043234 GO:0044822 GO:0051087
30.060.4554.060.080.773we9A GO:0009058 GO:0016740
40.060.4054.350.060.744amuA GO:0004585 GO:0005737 GO:0006520 GO:0006525 GO:0006591 GO:0016597 GO:0016740 GO:0016743 GO:0019546 GO:0019547
50.060.4893.550.050.783asxA GO:0003824 GO:0004310 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006629 GO:0006694 GO:0006695 GO:0008152 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008299 GO:0008610 GO:0009058 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016126 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0043231 GO:0045338 GO:0051996 GO:0055114
60.060.3774.150.060.663leeF GO:0003824 GO:0004310 GO:0005783 GO:0005789 GO:0006629 GO:0006694 GO:0006695 GO:0008152 GO:0008202 GO:0008203 GO:0008299 GO:0008610 GO:0009058 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016126 GO:0016491 GO:0016740 GO:0016765 GO:0043231 GO:0045338 GO:0051996 GO:0055114
70.060.3234.880.050.684clcC GO:0005737 GO:0006620 GO:0072380
80.060.3843.900.050.654ac8A GO:0004748 GO:0005506 GO:0005829 GO:0005971 GO:0009186 GO:0009263 GO:0016491 GO:0030145 GO:0046872 GO:0055114
90.060.3304.600.110.631dvkB GO:0000350 GO:0000386 GO:0000398 GO:0005634 GO:0005681 GO:0005682 GO:0006397 GO:0008380 GO:0046540 GO:0071021 GO:0071048
100.060.3783.860.040.623wfiB GO:0000166 GO:0005737 GO:0008677 GO:0015940 GO:0016491 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
110.060.3963.800.050.632d5kB GO:0005623 GO:0006879 GO:0006950 GO:0008199 GO:0016722 GO:0055114
120.060.3763.920.070.613wfjF GO:0000166 GO:0005737 GO:0008677 GO:0015940 GO:0016491 GO:0050661 GO:0055114
130.060.3184.150.070.582kwaA GO:0000166 GO:0004860 GO:0005524 GO:0006469 GO:0030435
140.060.4303.660.070.683lxzA GO:0004364 GO:0016740
150.060.2614.880.030.541jidA GO:0003723 GO:0005634 GO:0005730 GO:0005737 GO:0005739 GO:0005786 GO:0005829 GO:0006613 GO:0006614 GO:0008312 GO:0030529 GO:0042493 GO:0044822 GO:0048500
160.060.2904.850.020.563zbdA GO:0001172 GO:0003723 GO:0003968 GO:0004197 GO:0006508 GO:0008233 GO:0008234 GO:0008242 GO:0008270 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0016032 GO:0016740 GO:0016787 GO:0019079 GO:0019082 GO:0030430 GO:0030683 GO:0033644 GO:0036459 GO:0039503 GO:0039520 GO:0039548 GO:0039648 GO:0044220 GO:0046872
170.060.2984.150.010.541exzB GO:0000165 GO:0001541 GO:0001755 GO:0002687 GO:0002763 GO:0005088 GO:0005125 GO:0005173 GO:0005576 GO:0005615 GO:0005737 GO:0005856 GO:0005886 GO:0007155 GO:0007165 GO:0008083 GO:0008283 GO:0008284 GO:0008584 GO:0014066 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0033026 GO:0035162 GO:0035234 GO:0043066 GO:0043406 GO:0043547 GO:0045636 GO:0045740 GO:0046579 GO:0046854 GO:0046934 GO:0048015 GO:0050731 GO:0070668 GO:0097192 GO:1902035
180.060.2005.000.050.424v6iBr GO:0002181 GO:0003735 GO:0005622 GO:0005737 GO:0005840 GO:0006412 GO:0022625 GO:0030529 GO:0046677 GO:0046898


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0003824
GO-Score 0.33
Biological Processes GO:0016117 GO:0019547 GO:0019546 GO:0006950
GO-Score 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06
Cellular Component GO:0043209 GO:0005794 GO:0005634 GO:0016021 GO:0043234
GO-Score 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.