[Home] [Server] [About] [Statistics] [Annotation]

I-TASSER results for job id Rv2630

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]

 Input Sequence in FASTA format
 Predicted Secondary Structure
 Predicted Solvent Accessibility
 Predicted Normalized B-facotr
 Top 10 threading templates used by I-TASSER
 Top 5 final models predicted by I-TASSER

(For each target, I-TASSER simulations generate a large ensemble of structural conformations, called decoys. To select the final models, I-TASSER uses the SPICKER program to cluster all the decoys based on the pair-wise structure similarity, and reports up to five models which corresponds to the five largest structure clusters. The confidence of each model is quantitatively measured by C-score that is calculated based on the significance of threading template alignments and the convergence parameters of the structure assembly simulations. C-score is typically in the range of [-5, 2], where a C-score of higher value signifies a model with a high confidence and vice-versa. TM-score and RMSD are estimated based on C-score and protein length following the correlation observed between these qualities. Since the top 5 models are ranked by the cluster size, it is possible that the lower-rank models have a higher C-score in rare cases. Although the first model has a better quality in most cases, it is also possible that the lower-rank models have a better quality than the higher-rank models as seen in our benchmark tests. If the I-TASSER simulations converge, it is possible to have less than 5 clusters generated. This is usually an indication that the models have a good quality because of the converged simulations.)
 Proteins structureally close to the target in PDB (as identified by TM-align

(After the structure assembly simulation, I-TASSER uses the TM-align structural alignment program to match the first I-TASSER model to all structures in the PDB library. This section reports the top 10 proteins from the PDB that have the closest structural similarity, i.e. the highest TM-score, to the predicted I-TASSER model. Due to the structural similarity, these proteins often have similar function to the target. However, users are encouraged to use the data in the next section 'Predicted function using COACH' to infer the function of the target protein, since COACH has been extensively trained to derive biological functions from multi-source of sequence and structure features which has on average a higher accuracy than the function annotations derived only from the global structure comparison.)


 Predicted function using COACH

(This section reports biological annotations of the target protein by COACH based on the I-TASSER structure prediction. COACH is a meta-server approach that combines multiple function annotation results from the COFACTOR, TM-SITE and S-SITE programs.)


  Ligand binding sites

Rank C-score Cluster
size
PDB
Hit
Lig
Name
Download
Complex
Ligand Binding Site Residues
10.26 3 1j5uA CA Rep, Mult 55,178,179
20.06 1 3ld6B BCD Rep, Mult 56,57,58,59,60,79
30.06 1 3ls3C SPD Rep, Mult 66,98,134,135
40.06 1 3k24A III Rep, Mult 67,69,72,108,109,163
50.06 1 3k24B III Rep, Mult 69,72,73,108,113,157
60.06 1 3nedA NA Rep, Mult 78,122,123,124

Download the all possible binding ligands and detailed prediction summary.
Download the templates clustering results.
(a)C-score is the confidence score of the prediction. C-score ranges [0-1], where a higher score indicates a more reliable prediction.
(b)Cluster size is the total number of templates in a cluster.
(c)Lig Name is name of possible binding ligand. Click the name to view its information in the BioLiP database.
(d)Rep is a single complex structure with the most representative ligand in the cluster, i.e., the one listed in the Lig Name column.
Mult is the complex structures with all potential binding ligands in the cluster.

  Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and active sites

RankCscoreECPDB
Hit
TM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovEC NumberActive Site Residues
10.0602nqdB0.3825.260.0560.6543.4.22.15NA
20.0601mirA0.4285.430.0460.7713.4.22.1NA
30.0601ksdA0.4075.230.0590.6763.2.1.4100
40.0601jpzB0.3925.370.0190.6761.14.14.1,1.6.2.4NA
50.0601xqdA0.3855.710.0330.6981.7.99.7162
60.0607pckA0.4235.620.0600.7763.4.22.3875
70.0601egyA0.4055.120.0370.6821.14.-.-49,78
80.0601ftrD0.3914.320.0330.5642.3.1.101112,135
90.0601p2yA0.3805.680.0340.6931.14.15.176
100.0602ghuA0.4105.490.0750.7263.4.22.-NA
110.0601csbE0.2795.870.0380.5203.4.22.1107
120.0602c7yB0.4025.170.1130.6592.3.1.16NA
130.0601dkpA0.4055.060.0340.6653.1.3.2,3.1.3.26103
140.0603i3kA0.4085.060.0460.6651.14.13.70NA
150.0601gkpA0.4005.500.0580.7103.5.2.2NA
160.0601oxaA0.3965.440.0730.6873.4.23.2330,83
170.0603hf2A0.3905.280.0200.6591.14.14.1,1.6.2.4NA
180.0602c7zA0.3955.120.0950.6482.3.1.16NA
190.0601xpmC0.4105.480.0480.7152.3.3.1061,175

(a)CscoreEC is the confidence score for the EC number prediction. CscoreEC values range in between [0-1];
where a higher score indicates a more reliable EC number prediction.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided
by length of the query protein.

  Gene Ontology (GO) terms

Homologous GO templates in PDB 
RankCscoreGOTM-scoreRMSDaIDENaCovPDB HitAssociated GO Terms
00.170.4395.120.030.753ai5A
10.070.4385.310.010.774u2vB GO:0001776 GO:0001782 GO:0001783 GO:0001836 GO:0001974 GO:0002262 GO:0002352 GO:0005622 GO:0005739 GO:0005741 GO:0005783 GO:0005829 GO:0006091 GO:0006915 GO:0006919 GO:0006987 GO:0007420 GO:0007568 GO:0008053 GO:0008218 GO:0008283 GO:0008285 GO:0008630 GO:0008635 GO:0009620 GO:0010046 GO:0010225 GO:0010248 GO:0010332 GO:0010524 GO:0010629 GO:0014070 GO:0016020 GO:0016021 GO:0018298 GO:0019835 GO:0031018 GO:0031072 GO:0031100 GO:0031307 GO:0031966 GO:0032469 GO:0032471 GO:0033137 GO:0034644 GO:0035108 GO:0042493 GO:0042542 GO:0042802 GO:0042803 GO:0042981 GO:0043065 GO:0043496 GO:0043497 GO:0044325 GO:0044346 GO:0045471 GO:0045862 GO:0046872 GO:0046902 GO:0046930 GO:0046982 GO:0048597 GO:0048872 GO:0051087 GO:0051400 GO:0051726 GO:0051881 GO:0060068 GO:0070059 GO:0070242 GO:0071260 GO:0090200 GO:0097190 GO:0097192 GO:0097202 GO:1900103 GO:1901030 GO:1902262 GO:1903896
20.070.4395.010.020.742jadA GO:0004364 GO:0004602 GO:0005737 GO:0006091 GO:0008218 GO:0009055 GO:0010731 GO:0015035 GO:0015036 GO:0018298 GO:0034599 GO:0045454 GO:0055114 GO:0098869
30.070.4595.080.060.774ndjA GO:0006091 GO:0008218 GO:0018298
40.070.4584.730.050.734gf6B GO:0006091 GO:0008218 GO:0018298
50.070.4385.300.030.774jrbA GO:0006091 GO:0008218 GO:0018298
60.070.4415.140.070.753ls3D
70.060.4455.040.040.753pibB GO:0008218
80.060.4235.010.040.714q9wA GO:0006091 GO:0008218 GO:0018298
90.060.4324.710.070.694ohsB GO:0008218
100.060.4274.770.060.692whsB GO:0008218
110.060.4304.990.060.722arlA GO:0008218 GO:0010117 GO:0018298 GO:0018995
120.060.4345.190.060.752hpwA GO:0006091 GO:0008218
130.060.4234.840.020.694dkmA GO:0008218
140.060.4434.800.070.721xmzB GO:0008218 GO:0018298
150.060.4314.950.060.722icrC GO:0008218 GO:0018298
160.060.4185.020.030.704jeoA GO:0008218
170.060.4195.160.060.723cglA GO:0006091 GO:0008218 GO:0018298
180.060.4464.870.070.725fguA GO:0003676 GO:0006091 GO:0008218 GO:0016787 GO:0018298 GO:0046872


Consensus prediction of GO terms
 
Molecular Function GO:0051400 GO:0046982 GO:0042803 GO:0004602 GO:0004364 GO:0046872 GO:0015035 GO:0031072 GO:0044325 GO:0051087 GO:0009055
GO-Score 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07
Biological Processes GO:0006464
GO-Score 0.47
Cellular Component GO:0005829 GO:0046930 GO:0005783 GO:0031307
GO-Score 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07

(a)CscoreGO is a combined measure for evaluating global and local similarity between query and template protein. It's range is [0-1] and higher values indicate more confident predictions.
(b)TM-score is a measure of global structural similarity between query and template protein.
(c)RMSDa is the RMSD between residues that are structurally aligned by TM-align.
(d)IDENa is the percentage sequence identity in the structurally aligned region.
(e)Cov represents the coverage of global structural alignment and is equal to the number of structurally aligned residues divided by length of the query protein.
(f)The second table shows a consensus GO terms amongst the top scoring templates. The GO-Score associated with each prediction is defined as the average weight of the GO term, where the weights are assigned based on CscoreGO of the template.

[Click on result.tar.bz2 to download the tarball file including all modelling results listed on this page]



Please cite the following articles when you use the I-TASSER server:
1. J Yang, R Yan, A Roy, D Xu, J Poisson, Y Zhang. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nature Methods, 12: 7-8, 2015.
2. J Yang, Y Zhang. I-TASSER server: new development for protein structure and function predictions, Nucleic Acids Research, 43: W174-W181, 2015.
3.A Roy, A Kucukural, Y Zhang. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nature Protocols, 5: 725-738, 2010.
4.Y Zhang. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40, 2008.